Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Saturday, November 07, 2026

What Lincoln teaches us about MAGA Leonard Pitts, Jr. 20 hours ago What should we do with the traitors? Now that we have beaten them soundly, what should our attitude toward them be?

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

Q: The WSJ reported that the White House sent letters to conservative groups warning them that the White House is monitoring their statements and TV appearances. Why? TRUMP: I never heard that. I don't know. Maybe somebody said something, but I know nothing about it.

[image or embed]

-- Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) 7:39 PM · Nov 6, 2026

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

snip ...

All of which is worth keeping in mind while we debate the way forward from Tuesday's election. As Democrats storm back into power, any exultation is closely chased by the sobering realization of how much it will take to fix the wreckage the MAGA movement leaves behind. By virtually any relevant measure you care to use - health, diplomacy, military readiness, climate change, gas prices, immigration or even the simple maintenance of the White House grounds - the GOP has sown a path of destruction that would do a tornado proud. Anyone who has ever lifted the garage door on a Saturday morning to confront a pile of junk sprawling from floor to ceiling and wall to wall will be familiar with the dilemma Democrats in Congress face when they take office in January: a mess so daunting, you hardly know where to begin.

Given that the donkey party is not itself unduly burdened by popularity, lawmakers would be well advised to begin delivering for the American people sooner rather than later. It is incumbent upon them to remind the electorate what governance looks like and to prove that they can deliver it.

"Anyone who has ever lifted the garage door on a Saturday morning to confront a pile of junk sprawling from floor to ceiling and wall to wall will be familiar with the dilemma Democrats in Congress face when they take office in January: a mess so daunting, you hardly know where to begin."

#1 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-11-07 10:33 AM | Reply

snip ...

But to frame what we feel as simply a desire for revenge is to render petty and tawdry that which is simply human. Why else do we have courts, if not to satisfy a basic need to see those who have done wrong held accountable - a need, in other words, to see justice done? There is nothing either petty or tawdry about that. As a practical matter, the promise of justice served stands as a deterrent to those who might be tempted to do wrong. As a moral matter, it reinforces the idea that society functions in an orderly and predictable manner, that crime doesn't pay and that at least once in awhile, those who commit misdeeds will be required to answer for them.
Indeed: Why else do we have courts, if not to satisfy a basic need to see those who have done wrong held accountable?

#2 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-11-07 10:33 AM | Reply

snip ...

No, this is not a call for MAGA executions. Not even close. But is it really asking so much that there be vigorous Congressional investigations of its misdeeds? That breaches of trust be exposed? That thieves be punished for their thievery? That lawbreakers go to prison? That if impeachment be indicated, it be pursued? That bad people face public shame?

Don't we deserve that? Doesn't the future deserve it? Don't we need that at least as much as we need affordable gas? Isn't it time, 161 years after the guns of Civil War went silent, to finally make it clear that those who break faith with the United States of America will pay a price for doing so?

It is all well and good and even evinces a certain nobility of spirit to swallow your grievances and move on. Except that sometimes, grievances are too grievous for that. DeSantis speaks of the election as a near extinction level event for his party, but the greater truth is that his party has been a near extinction level event for American democracy, has brought us as close to the brink as we have ever been.

And while there is a certain seductive power in the idea of now letting them up easy, while it may seem pragmatic, while it even appeals to our innate sense of decency, history tells us in no uncertain terms that that is a bad idea. The forces of intolerance took the wrong lessons from Lincoln's charity. That's one of the reasons MAGA even exists.

Let's not make the same mistake twice.

"...the greater truth is that his party has been a near extinction level event for American democracy, has brought us as close to the brink as we have ever been."

#3 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-11-07 10:34 AM | Reply

Tear down the piggy administration brick by brick burn it to the ground and salt the ashes
Full, harsh and irrevocable punishments for the worst offenders.
Swift and sure and devastating criminal punishment for any and all political and corporate criminals

Not a year of "investigations" followed by a year of referrals for prosecutions followed by years of court battles followed by years of appeals

Swift and sure justice

Defund everything magat related-wars, ICE, the DoJ, HHS, the State Department

Not a dime

Impeach Piggy and half his cabinet and Alito and Thomas and a couple of others for lying to congress

Tear down EVERY SINGLE MONUMENT piggy has built to himself from the ballroom to the ------- picture of an autopen

Piss on every one of them

that should be the first 100 days

#4 | Posted by truthhurts at 2026-11-07 05:01 PM | Reply

"White House sent letters to conservative groups warning them that the White House is monitoring their statements"

Fascists never think the other fascists will come for them.

Us non-fascists should also come for them.

All of them.

For Treason.

#5 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-11-07 10:54 PM | Reply

@#4 ... Tear down the piggy administration brick by brick burn it to the ground and salt the ashes
Full, harsh and irrevocable punishments for the worst offenders.
Swift and sure and devastating criminal punishment for any and all political and corporate criminals ...

OK, that may resolve the current issues you face, but what about the future of the Country?

How should the laws be changed to discourage such beahvior in the future?


#6 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-11-07 11:18 PM | Reply

@5 ... "White House sent letters to conservative groups warning them that the White House is monitoring their statements" ...

Why would a "White House" even want to send out such letters?

#7 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-11-07 11:59 PM | Reply

For the country, we need to lessen the power of the Presidency, and stronger rules against corruption in all 3 branches including the repeal of Citizens United. We need more paper trails to be public, so that we can follow the money and identify other problem areas of corruption. Term limits for the Court, House, and Senate. Rules limiting how early one can declare their candidacy and rules limiting campaign ads. Laws to better ensure that companies that claim to be news media are a separate entity from the government and not propaganda arms.

#8 | Posted by hamburglar at 2026-11-08 03:50 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

...including the repeal of Citizens United

Montana found a way around CU because states set the rules for companies incorporated within their borders. Initiative 194, approved by voters on Tuesday night, bans corporate donations to political parties and individual candidates.

Montana Tests a Novel Way Around Citizens United

"In a state President Donald Trump won by nearly 20 points in 2024, roughly 65% of Montanans voted to approve Initiative 194 " the Montana Plan' " embracing a novel legal strategy to curb corporate political spending. If states cannot restrict political speech under Citizens United, can they instead strip corporations of the power to spend money on elections?"

politicalwire.com

#9 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2026-11-08 04:21 AM | Reply

I want Trumpanzee to be forced to complete his term in a neutered state. I am so sick of cl0wns pardoning... so the country can move on. I want Trumpanzee's legacy peeled like an overripe banana. I want his assets frozen.

#10 | Posted by RightisTrite at 2026-11-08 04:23 AM | Reply

"I know nothing about it."

Means he threw a fit, demanded this be done and now it's being done.

#11 | Posted by jpw at 2026-11-08 05:16 AM | Reply

What's left.

After the autopsy of the Trump administration and the GOP's complicity, will we still have a two party system (Dem and Republican) in 2028?

#12 | Posted by Twinpac at 2026-11-08 05:41 AM | Reply

"What now?"

Two years isn't very much time for the Republican Party to rebuild their image and groom a squeaky clean candidate for 2028.

Next to impossible I'd venture to say with Trump, a constant reminder, still at the helm finishing out his term.

I'm thinking Senate Republicans might not be opposed to an impeachment AND conviction.

Throw Trump to the wolves, so to speak.

#13 | Posted by Twinpac at 2026-11-08 06:46 AM | Reply

Over the next two years I do hope the Dems in Congress push through bill after bill, taking money out of politics and putting in age limits for some positions, and other popular issues with the voters. Sure, Trump will veto them, but that will let people see the Republican Party for what it is, still in the pocket of the Musk's and Trump's of the land.

#14 | Posted by Hughmass at 2026-11-08 06:54 AM | Reply

HUGH

There are still 18 Republican Senators up for re-election in 2028.

Wouldn't it be prudent to impeach and convict Trump now. They'd likely be willing to partner up with Democrats to convict, if for no other reason than to give themselves talking points in 2028.

#15 | Posted by Twinpac at 2026-11-08 07:27 AM | Reply

Lots of good suggestions here but no matter what site I'm on no one mentions the "Heritage" Foundation. Unless that gets excised out of existence, our nation will always be in peril. Kevin Roberts, Vought and Miller created this disaster and they are not going away voluntarily. I also heard an NPR interview with Roberts yesterday. A "yes sir, what about this sir" soft touch, squishy back & forth that made me want to efffing scream!

#16 | Posted by Yodagirl at 2026-11-08 08:54 AM | Reply

Wouldn't it be prudent to impeach and convict Trump now.

Not prudent and not good for the economy.

Not unless republicans agree up front to convict. This is why Nixon resigned. He saw that there were enough republicans already to convict him. So there was no point in resisting.

Also Trumpy cannot do the math so the math doesn't even matter.

He will sleep thru every trial to the bitter end.

#17 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-11-08 09:31 AM | Reply

DONNER

"Not unless republicans agree up front to convict."

That's the exact point I was trying to make. With so many Senate seats still up for grabs in 2028 it shouldn't be too hard to get their cooperation in exchange for the favorable talking points that distance themselves from Trump in 2028.

It's an alternative to all those time wasting vetos and overrides we can expect with Trump still in office.

#18 | Posted by Twinpac at 2026-11-08 10:28 AM | Reply

The drawback I see in impeachment is that the evidence against Trump could also put the spotlight on some of the very Senators we'd need to convict.

It's a sticky wicket that would have to be carefully choregraphed.

#19 | Posted by Twinpac at 2026-11-08 10:39 AM | Reply

Reminder that the American people are stupid and morally bankrupt and 2 years from mow will blame democrats for everything and put a republican back in the white house and give them control of congress

cause Americans are idiots

#20 | Posted by truthhurts at 2026-11-08 10:40 AM | Reply

Start with something useful and immediate, that could actually get signed into law, like legalizing cannabis.

#21 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2026-11-08 10:42 AM | Reply

SITZ

Something tells me that you're thinking more about yourself rather than the more pressing problems facing the country.

#22 | Posted by Twinpac at 2026-11-08 10:57 AM | Reply

I do not partake, nor would risk my job on it.

It's the low hanging fruit that would actually get signed into law. The first words after What Now? are "What Lincoln teaches us".

What did Lincoln teach us? "President Abraham Lincoln's approach to reconciliation focused on rapidly restoring the Union with leniency toward the South rather than harsh retribution, framed around healing national division after the American Civil War." Leniency & forgiveness > harsh retribution.

#23 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2026-11-08 11:28 AM | Reply

If you want to be the party of harsh retribution, there's one for that, it's called the Republican Party.

#24 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2026-11-08 11:29 AM | Reply

Lincoln's approach to reconciliation focused on rapidly restoring the Union with leniency toward the South rather than harsh retribution, framed around healing national division after the American Civil War." Leniency & forgiveness > harsh retribution.

Yes sure.

And how did that work out for Lincoln and the rest of the country?

#25 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-11-08 12:06 PM | Reply

SITZ

I don't know what any of that has to do with top priorities.

Otherwise, if you think Trump can be reasoned with or swayed with logic, you're in a dream world. He thinks people who are forgiving are weak and to be squashed like bugs. He said himself that he never forgets and he never forgives. The only thing he really understands is strength

#26 | Posted by Twinpac at 2026-11-08 12:20 PM | Reply

I had no problem with Grant sending the troops home with a gun and a horse. Including General Lee.

But still think they should have hung Jefferson Davis.

Reconciliation was a complete failure and the country suffered for a hundred years after.

#27 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-11-08 12:46 PM | Reply

#27
Prior to heading an armed rebellion against the United States, which led to horrific casualties, Jefferson Davis took the required oaths when, pre-war, he joined the military, served in the Senate, and accepted a Cabinet position. At best, he deserved the smallest, most isolated berth at Fort Jefferson in the Dry Tortugas.

#28 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2026-11-08 01:03 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort