"1. Claiming the "other crimes" had to be listed on the indictment"
I provided a government link that says pretty much that. And the guideline/clarification is tied to 6A.
"2. Claiming Braggs didn't have the authority to charge "other crimes""
He doesn't have the authority to charge FEDERAL crimes.
"3. Implying since it was a federal election Bragg didn't have a case"
IF the furtherance of the "other crime" was a federal election violation than Bragg absolutely doesn't have a case.
"4. Claiming that the "other crimes" is a due process issue"
It absolutely is. Whether the "other crime" was committed or intended to be committed, it has to be proven beyond reasonable doubt in a court of law.
"5. Implying the length of time since the crimes is somehow political despite a. Shitler being president and thus not able to be indicted for 4 years, b. Shitler delaying tactics and the charge having been filed last year"
What I believe, based upon what I've watched unfold, is that the timing of when these cases are being brought is political and coordinated. I ALSO said, that while the timing sure as hell looks political, that doesn't mean the cases themselves, this particular one notwithstanding, are bogus based on legal merits.
"6. Implying the legality of NDAs has anything to do with this case."
I pointed out that NDA's are legal. That's it.
Your reading comprehension is terrible. I guess your abject hatred of me clouds your ability to accurately read what is actually written and what is being conveyed.
Religion Sucks Ass.