FBI Has Secret Epstein Prison Tape with No Missing Minute

Tuesday, July 29, 2025

The FBI has a version of the surveillance video filmed near Jeffrey Epstein's prison block on the night of his death that -- unlike the video released to the public -- is not missing a minute of footage.

Posted by Corky at 06:30 PM | 153 COMMENTS | permalink

There was no "missing minute" in Epstein jail video, government source says www.cbsnews.com/news/jeffrey ...

[image or embed]
-- Scott MacFarlane (@macfarlanenews.bsky.social) Jul 29, 2025 at 7:13 AM

Comments

"The DOJ said the "full raw" clip would have captured anyone entering Epstein's cell the night he died, but forensic analysis showed the video was edited repeatedly over several hours, with about a minute of footage missing.

Now, government sources say the FBI, Bureau of Prisons, and DOJ inspector general all possess a copy of the video that contains the infamous "missing minute," CBS News reported."

;;

If you can't access the thread link, here's a video showing the article:

www.youtube.com

#1 | Posted by Corky at 2025-07-29 12:55 PM

Didn't Bondi, who said she had Epstein's client list sitting on her desk until that claim became "inoperative," also claim she released the"full raw" video?

"Rocky, watch me pull a rabbit out of my hat!"

#2 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2025-07-29 01:12 PM

Then simply release your data and stop with the cover-up.

More than THREE minutes, in fact are "missing".

There are SO MANY OTHER CAMERAS, even ones facing Epsteins cell - AND INSIDE THE CELL.

The FBI, DOJ and Bureau of Prisons is a scam, providing no confidence.

#3 | Posted by redlightrobot at 2025-07-29 01:15 PM

This is getting good.

I am gonna need way more popcorn.

#4 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-07-29 01:29 PM

... is not missing a minute of footage ...

Wasn't that missing minute originally attributed, by the DoJ, to the camera "rebooting" each night to assure its proper operation.

Now, suddenly, that missing minute is available?

#5 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-07-29 01:31 PM

Now, suddenly, that missing minute is available?
#5 | Posted by LampLighter

Bondi was lying.

#6 | Posted by rstybeach11 at 2025-07-29 01:42 PM

Epstein was murdered. By Trump.

Elegant solution to this cover-up "mystery".

Donald would sooner douse himself in gasoline and set himself alight rather than give out the full Epstein files.

#7 | Posted by Zed at 2025-07-29 01:59 PM

Motive, opportunity, sociopathy.

Trump had Epstein killed.

#8 | Posted by Zed at 2025-07-29 02:01 PM

I heard an argument that 1 minute isn't enough time to kill someone, so Epstein had to have committed suicide.

But when asked how Epstein had enough time to hang himself in a minute without catching any of it, he couldn't explain and said we'd never know so who cares.

This is the people who support Trump.

They're not rational.

They believe the lie and if the lie is challenged or disproven, they admit they don't really care and nothings gonna change their support for Trump.

It's how Putin, Kim JongUn, Middle Eastern dictators, etc etc etc ... all stay in power.

You need the smallest of support from the population to maintain power.

That and control over the military.

#9 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-07-29 06:58 PM

Rumor is that the Missing Minute was the time it took for Trump to get off before he whined Epstein to death.

#10 | Posted by Corky at 2025-07-29 07:02 PM

@#5 ... Wasn't that missing minute originally attributed, by the DoJ, to the camera "rebooting" each night to assure its proper operation. ...

Found this ...

Bondi explains missing minute in Epstein video (July 8, 2025)
thehill.com

... Attorney General Pam Bondi on Tuesday sought to tamp down outrage on the right over the Justice Department's recent memo on disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein.

The Justice Department and FBI released a roughly 11-hour video Monday recorded outside Epstein's prison cell door to dispel claims Epstein did not die by suicide. Some on the far right have seized on time stamps in the video, which skip from 11:58 p.m. to midnight.

"The video was not conclusive, but the evidence prior to it was showing he committed suicide," Bondi explained during a Cabinet meeting.

"And what was on that -- there was a minute that was off the counter, and what we learned from the Bureau of Prisons is every night they redo that video. ...

So, every night the video is reset, and every night should have the same minute missing," she added. ...

[emphasis mine]

#11 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-07-29 07:20 PM

It is very clear that the FBI and DoJ is either entirely corrupt or incompetent. I am 100% certain that Bondi (who is not very bright) simply believed the turds in the FBI and DoJ when they gave the ridiculous explanation for the missing minute - this is not something that she came up with on her own. But, it is a sign of her lack of intelligence that she believed it as it is simply beyond comprehension that this lock up would have a system by which cameras are repeatedly inoperable and missing footage on a nightly basis.

#12 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-29 09:07 PM

@#12 ... It is very clear that the FBI and DoJ is either entirely corrupt or incompetent. ...

I disagree. (well, maybe after Pres Trump has installed his toadies, yeah. But that is a different thread)

AG Bondi, to me, is capable of being quite competent. But how does she seem to use that competence?

Upholding the Constitution, as an AG should do above all else?

Or parroting what Pres Trump may want her to parrot and try to uphold?

That is the important point your current alias' comment seems to actively try to sidestep and avoid answering.

#13 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-07-29 09:48 PM

"Or parroting what Pres Trump may want her to parrot and try to uphold?
That is the important point your current alias' comment seems to actively try to sidestep and avoid answering.
#13 | Posted by LampLighter"

If there was ANYTHING incriminating against Trump - why did the Biden DoJ/FBI sit on it and charge him with their weak sauce cases? They had 4 years and did nothing with this damaging information? Thus, we are back to my point - they are either corrupt or incompetent.

Also, why didn't a single Dem source run to contradict Bondi when she made this announcement about her explanation for the missing minute? The DoJ/FBI had these tapes for 4 YEARS - and yet, I did not see a single Dem leak to their MSM friends the truth that the missing minute was available and thus Bondi was either incompetent or lying. How do you explain this?

#14 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-29 10:40 PM

@#14 ... If there was ANYTHING incriminating against Trump - why did the Biden DoJ/FBI sit on it ...

And, if fmr Pres Biden had done that, my guess would be that your alias would be all up in arms about political retribution.

But that aside.

Why does Pres Trump seem to trying to cover up a conspiracy theory his supporters seem to have created?

A "conspiracy theory" that he seems to have raised multiple times during his campaign?

And a conspiracy theory that MAGA has not only bought in to, but has propagated.

So, yeah, your current alias may try to deflect to a different topic, but it won't work.

MAGA wants answers.

What's yer got?

#15 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-07-29 10:50 PM

"Why does Pres Trump seem to trying to cover up a conspiracy theory his supporters seem to have created?
#15 | Posted by LampLighter"

My guess - as I have posted before - is that he is being pressured by US intelligence agencies along with Israel to not release the files as they are still actively using it for blackmail purposes as well as its potential to disrupt the financial markets and shake overall confidence in world governments - both by the intelligence services actively pimping minors and the world leaders being a bunch of pedos.

But, I think Trump has reached his breaking points with the Democrats and the Deep State so now the files are going to come out - AND THEY SHOULD. Give the people the information and let the chips fall where they may.

#16 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-29 10:56 PM

#12 | Posted by ScottS

LOL oh you poor stupid sack of s(*&.

An argument that the s(*&bags you voted for aren't actually more swampy and deep statey than the supposed deep state swamp you've been duped into believing existed but are instead incompetent idiots isn't the dunk you think it is.

#17 | Posted by jpw at 2025-07-29 11:04 PM

If there was ANYTHING incriminating against Trump - why did the Biden DoJ/FBI sit on it and charge him with their weak sauce cases?

Because not everybody is a corrupt s*&^bag like you and the people you support?

Seriously, the world is a much easier place to understand if you just accept you're a giant pile of s*&^ of a human being. Just assume every thought of yours is generated from the empty skull of a piece of talking dog s(*& "liberal" and go from there. Thing will be much clearer.

#18 | Posted by jpw at 2025-07-29 11:09 PM

The court records were sealed until january 2025 as I recall.

Hmmm, what's trump the pedo hiding?

#19 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-07-29 11:11 PM

@#16 ... My guess - as I have posted before - is that he is being pressured by US intelligence agencies along with Israel to not release the files as they are still actively using it for blackmail purposes ...

All the more reason to release the files.

But I do note the addition of "Israel" to your current alias' comment.

Do try harder.

Yeah, that was a lame deflection attempt, imo. ;)

#20 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-07-29 11:12 PM

@#17 ... LOL oh you poor stupid sack of s(*&. ...

So... it is not just me who sees that?

#21 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-07-29 11:16 PM

"An argument that the s(*&bags you voted for aren't actually more swampy and deep statey than the supposed deep state swamp you've been duped into believing existed but are instead incompetent idiots isn't the dunk you think it is.
#17 | Posted by jpw"

We will see ------- - but the fact that you didn't say a word when Biden sat on the Epstein files for 4 years speaks volumes about YOU.

The fact that there is an uproar and action AT ALL - is because it was demanded by MAGA. The Liberals were just fine letting their Democrat pedo escape any public shaming.

My bet - Trump calls the liberal bluff and releases the files.

#22 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-29 11:16 PM

Trump was told by Bondi he's IN the files.

So he's not going to release them unless they are heavily redacted.

#23 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-07-29 11:18 PM

The fact that there is an uproar and action AT ALL - is because it was demanded by MAGA

Democrats voted to release the material.

Republicans (MAGA) voted against that.

STOP LYING.

#24 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-07-29 11:19 PM

"Because not everybody is a corrupt s*&^bag like you and the people you support?
#18 | Posted by jpw"

Okay ------- - let's take your premise that Biden and his DoJ/FBI are not corrupt so they didn't release the files.

That would mean that THERE WAS NOTHING TO RELEASE - OR - that they protected Trump because they didn't want to interfere in an election.

So, which is it? I want your opinion as a $15/hour beaker washer on this. Show us your big brain!

#25 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-29 11:19 PM

"#21 | Posted by LampLighter"

Says they guy that whines constantly about ad hominem attacks. I will go back to just kicking the ass of your Danforth carbon copy now - you bore me.

#26 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-29 11:21 PM

Democrats began bringing up Epstein-related votes in the Rules Committee last week, with Republicans voting down multiple efforts to bring forward measures requiring the release of information related to the convicted sex offender.

Republican leaders eventually had to placate their members on the Rules Committee, who did not want to keep voting down Epstein measures, by bringing forward their own symbolic resolution calling for the release of certain Epstein documents. Johnson has not put that bill on the floor for full House consideration.

Democrats were prepared to repeat their efforts in the Rules Committee this week, but the panel recessed without advancing any legislation in order to avoid more votes on Epstein documents.

Without action by the Rules Committee, which all legislation must pass through before reaching the floor, the House canceled votes Thursday and let members leave town a day early.

www.nbcnews.com

#27 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-07-29 11:22 PM

That would mean that THERE WAS NOTHING TO RELEASE

So what's on Pam Bondi's desk?

Liar.

#28 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-07-29 11:22 PM

"Democrats voted to release the material.
Republicans (MAGA) voted against that.
STOP LYING.
#24 | Posted by Alexandrite"

Except that was not actually what they were voting on ------- - and we all know it.

The Democrats are all about framing and issue rather than having actual truth and this was not exception.

What we do have - the Democrats trying to block Maxwell from naming names.

But, Trump will call their bluff and liberals heads will roll. Tune up the "Trump's DoJ is lying with Maxwell" because you will be playing it very soon.

#29 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-29 11:25 PM

abcnews.go.com

Judge Rosenberg faulted the Justice Department for failing to outline sufficient arguments to justify the unsealing of the records, which are normally protected under strict secrecy rules.

Rosenberg's opinion states her "hands are tied" given existing precedent in the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals which only permits the disclosure of such grand jury materials under narrow exceptions.

#30 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-07-29 11:25 PM

Except that was not actually what they were voting on ------- - and we all know it.

Shamelessly lied to by right wing echo chamber?
Stupid?

Your guess is as good as mine.

#31 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-07-29 11:26 PM

I'll ask again...

What was on Pam Bondi's desk?

#32 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-07-29 11:27 PM

Is she lying?

#33 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-07-29 11:27 PM

"Judge Rosenberg
#30 | Posted by Alexandrite"

Typical OBAMA judge.

#34 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-29 11:27 PM

you mean "jew"

#35 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-07-29 11:29 PM

"What was on Pam Bondi's desk?
#32 | Posted by Alexandrite"

I personally think Bondi is naive or incompetent - she probably believed that the DoJ and FBI actually handed over all the files and was then blindsided by the fact that they didn't.

I fully support her removal from her position.

#36 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-29 11:29 PM

@#26 ... Says they guy that whines constantly about ad hominem attacks. ...

Maybe appropriately?

That aside ...

Back in the day, when I ran a message board, my main moderation concern was: criticize the comment, not the poster of that comment.

Do try harder.

#37 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-07-29 11:29 PM

@#29 ... Except that was not actually what they were voting on ------- - and we all know it. ...

If "we all know it" please provide the evidence.

It should be easy to provide if we all know it.

Yer up.

What's yer got?

#38 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-07-29 11:32 PM

"Shamelessly lied to by right wing echo chamber?
#31 | Posted by Alexandrite"

It is actually called THE TRUTH. I summarize below for your smooth brain:

The Democratic resolutions (Khanna's and Veasey's) included provisions tying Epstein file releases to unrelated legislation (GENIUS Act, defense funding) and, in Veasey's case, demands for an FBI misconduct report.

Dems don't want a clean resolution because they don't actually want it to pass - but, you would know this already if you listened to something other than MSNBC.

#39 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-29 11:33 PM

@#36 ... I fully support her removal from her position. ...

Why?

Maybe because she seems to have failed in her support of Pres Trump?

Related: who might your current alias want to replace her?

#40 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-07-29 11:35 PM

who might your current alias want to replace her?

Probably Glen Beck.

#41 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-07-29 11:40 PM

"who might your current alias want to replace her?
#40 | Posted by LampLighter"

Matt Gaetz - use a recess appointment. The Dems fear this, which is why they are not taking a recess as usual as their only playbook is to obstruct at this point.

#42 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-29 11:45 PM

Matt Gaetz

LMAO. Another pedo!

#43 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-07-29 11:46 PM

We will see ------- - but the fact that you didn't say a word when Biden sat on the Epstein files for 4 years speaks volumes about YOU.

No, it doesn't.

I wasn't the one who made a big to do about it...until it was clear my cult leader would be implicated.

I assume there will be all manner of public people on there, some shocking and others not so shocking, but I never made it a big thing until that became inconvenient.

Yet again, s*&^bag, don't project your shortcomings on everyone else.

That would mean that THERE WAS NOTHING TO RELEASE - OR - that they protected Trump because they didn't want to interfere in an election.

Again, just imagine you're just as big a piece of s(*& as the caricature of libruls that you believe to be true is and you'll see why the above statement is laughable.

You'll never understand integrity because you don't have any.

BTW must (most?) of those records are under seal. No surprise the rule of law means nothing to s*&^heaps like you.

So, which is it? I want your opinion as a $15/hour beaker washer on this. Show us your big brain!

#25 | Posted by ScottS

As usual, your posts ooze inadequacy and mediocrity.

#44 | Posted by jpw at 2025-07-29 11:49 PM

#36 | Posted by ScottS

I vote for a conman who hires stupid people! 'Murica!

-S*&^bagS.

#45 | Posted by jpw at 2025-07-29 11:50 PM

"I wasn't the one who made a big to do about it...until it was clear my cult leader would be implicated.
#44 | Posted by jpw"

I made a big to do about it back then and I am still making a big to do about it now - I don't care if Trump is implicated or not. Release the files and let the chips fall where they may. Removing pedophiles from positions of power is WAY more important than protecting members of a political party.

Of course, you won't say the same. You only care now because you think it hurts Trump - when the tables turn and the files are released, you will go silent again and/or claim all the files are fake. You know it - and I know it because that is what you ------- liberals ALWAYS do.

#46 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-29 11:53 PM

@#42 ... The Dems fear this, ...

Do the Dems really fear it, as your current alias asserts?

If the Dems fear it, why? Maybe because it might weaken the Country?

Or do they see an utter lack of of capability for the position, aside from an obsequious adulation of Pres Trump?

Or?

The latter seems to be the norm for the appointees of Pres Trump.

For example, Sec of Defense Hegseth.

#47 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-07-29 11:53 PM

I fully support her removal from her position.

#36 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-29 11:29 PM | Reply | Flag

Why doesn't trump fire lyin' bondi?

#48 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-07-29 11:53 PM

I don't care if Trump is implicated or not.

BS. You want MATT GAETZ of all people to cover trumps orange fat ass.

#49 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-07-29 11:54 PM

"I vote for a conman who hires stupid people!
#45 | Posted by jpw"

You voted for Biden - so, yes - that is exactly what you did. Not to mentioned a documented pedophile as stated by his own daughter. But much like Epstein, you don't want the truth behind that either.

#50 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-29 11:54 PM

I made a big to do about it back then

Under what handle?

#51 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-07-29 11:55 PM

"Why doesn't trump fire lyin' bondi?
#48 | Posted by Alexandrite"

Trump's biggest fault is that he values perceived loyalty over competence. He did this repeatedly in his first term. So, he is too slow to act on personnel issues. Trump is not perfect - he is just the best we have available to run the country.

#52 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-29 11:56 PM

So what's on Pam Bondi's desk?

Liar.

#28 | Posted by Alexandrite

Apparently, to S*&^bagS, it was probably a folder full of blank sheet of paper Bondi was too stupid to know wasn't the list when she said she had the list because those pesky deep state devils fooled her again!! *maniacal laugh*

That idiot has no idea.

#53 | Posted by jpw at 2025-07-29 11:56 PM

@#46 ... Removing pedophiles from positions of power is WAY more important than protecting members of a political party. .. .

I agree.

Which is why I want the full Epstein files to be released (redacted victims names, of course).

Let the dice fall where they may

#54 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-07-29 11:58 PM

"trumps is not perfect"

You don't say.

www.cnn.com

When Attorney General Pam Bondi briefed President Donald Trump in May on the Justice Department's review of the documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein case, she told him that his name appeared in the files, sources familiar with the discussion told CNN.

LOL

#55 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-07-29 11:59 PM

"#53 | Posted by jpw"

You never answered by #25 ------- - why is that?

By your own premise, one of these must be true:

"That would mean that THERE WAS NOTHING TO RELEASE - OR - that they protected Trump because they didn't want to interfere in an election.
So, which is it?"

#56 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-29 11:59 PM

false dichotomy. Logical fallacy.

You can't think, Scotts.

#57 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-07-30 12:00 AM

OK, so how did we get here from the original topic of this thread?

FBI Has Secret Epstein Prison Tape with No Missing Minute

Quite the deflection attempt.

#58 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-07-30 12:00 AM

At least we're still on the Epstein subject.

Scotts usually deflects to numbers and then loses his ass to danforth.

Next he's going to argue law with Et_Al...

#59 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-07-30 12:02 AM

You voted for Biden - so, yes - that is exactly what you did. Not to mentioned a documented pedophile as stated by his own daughter.

Swing and a miss s*&^bag.

But much like Epstein, you don't want the truth behind that either.

#50 | Posted by ScottS

Your faux fervor isn't wanting the truth. It's wanting a narrative you've been fed and believed without thinking.

Which is why you're desperate for Bondi to fit the new narrative to lift the discomfort you feel at the previous not being what you were sold.

Me? I didn't turn it into a political dog whistle only to get upset at how the real world turned out.

Why? Because I'm not a stupid pile of s*&^ like you.

You really need to just STFU and stop thinking you have opinions worth a s(*& or "thoughts" worth expressing. People like you, in the past, lived long, happy lives by being quiet and staying hidden like you belonged.

#60 | Posted by jpw at 2025-07-30 12:02 AM

As i stated in #5 ...

... Wasn't that missing minute originally attributed, by the DoJ, to the camera "rebooting" each night to assure its proper operation.

Now, suddenly, that missing minute is available? ...

Why now?

#61 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-07-30 12:03 AM

"government sources say" ...

How many times in the last ten years has this been proven false?

#62 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-07-30 12:03 AM

Tell us. Use X.com.

Lazy ----.

#63 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-07-30 12:04 AM

Sorry, that was rude.

Lazy pedophile protecting ----. That's more accurate.

#64 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-07-30 12:05 AM

#46 | Posted by ScottS

At this point, yeah I'll take any released documents with a grain of salt. Anyone with half a brain would.

It's -------s like you, on either side, that will run with it unquestioningly if it fits your narrative. I've been honest about that for a while now. Well before this recent iteration started.

#65 | Posted by jpw at 2025-07-30 12:05 AM

Trump's biggest fault is that he values perceived loyalty over competence.

Wow, you finally say something worth saying...

Trump is not perfect - he is just the best we have available to run the country.

#52 | Posted by ScottS

Then you prove you're the terarded piece of s(*& we know you to be.

You're. F*&^ing. Stupid.

#66 | Posted by jpw at 2025-07-30 12:08 AM

"When Attorney General Pam Bondi briefed President Donald Trump in May on the Justice Department's review of the documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein case, she told him that his name appeared in the files, sources familiar with the discussion told CNN.
#55 | Posted by Alexandrite"

We have known this for the last 5 years already -------. What we don't know is if there was any activity beyond the known flight logs. But, again, given Biden's DoJ/FBI did not leak this during the election, the logical conclusion is that there is nothing to leak on Trump.

#67 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-30 12:09 AM

#54 | Posted by LampLighter

That stupid pile of s(*& doesn't realize that it's statements like that that tell us what a stupid pile of s*&^ he is.

He's the only one bending over backwards to justify in his mind why a certain politician isn't on the list while accusing everyone else of refusing to acknowledge a hypothetical release.

The stupid f*&^ won't even be able to read that line and think "hey, maybe my posts are kind of ridiculous..."

#68 | Posted by jpw at 2025-07-30 12:10 AM

"At this point, yeah I'll take any released documents with a grain of salt."
#65 | Posted by jpw"

And the hedging starts early with this one. Just as I predicted you would.

What I 100% guarantee - if the files implicate Trump in ANY WAY - you will not take anything with a grain of salt - they will be the words straight from the Lord's mouth.

#69 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-30 12:11 AM

You never answered by #25 ------- - why is that?

Yes, I did.

This is the part where someone with integrity would get what I said...

#70 | Posted by jpw at 2025-07-30 12:12 AM

Youve known for five years and still voted for trump?

"-------" is right.

#71 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-07-30 12:13 AM

How many times in the last ten years has this been proven false?

#62 | Posted by oneironaut

How many times has it been proven correct?

You're reaching for a conclusion because that's the conclusion you want to reach.

Because you're a stupid pile of dishonest s*&^.

#72 | Posted by jpw at 2025-07-30 12:13 AM

ScottS is one of those shrieking Maenads who have a windshield wiper running to clean the spittle off their monitor.

#73 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-07-30 12:13 AM

But, again, given Biden's DoJ/FBI did not leak this during the election, the logical conclusion is that there is nothing to leak on Trump.

#67 | Posted by ScottS

No, that's just the conclusion you want to reach because you lack integrity or any sense of honesty.

#74 | Posted by jpw at 2025-07-30 12:14 AM

"#68 | Posted by jpw"

But again - the better question. Assuming Trump is implicated in the files - why didn't the Biden DoJ/FBI prosecute him for it? Are they pedophile-enablers? They had the files for 4 years - and...nothing? So, again, explain to us all why they did this that does not include the explanation "Because Trump did nothing wrong".

You have been challenged - now, man up and answer.

#75 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-30 12:14 AM

"No, that's just the conclusion you want to reach because you lack integrity or any sense of honesty.
#74 | Posted by jpw"

So, what other conclusion can we reach?

#76 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-30 12:15 AM

already been answered.

trump ran on releasing the files he now says

-dont exist
-were written by obama

you've been had. willfully.

#77 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-07-30 12:16 AM

And the hedging starts early with this one. Just as I predicted you would.

Wow. You predicted a position I've expressed for years on this topic? Holy hell. You're f*&^ing incredible...

Idiot.

What I 100% guarantee - if the files implicate Trump in ANY WAY - you will not take anything with a grain of salt - they will be the words straight from the Lord's mouth.

#69 | Posted by ScottS

I'm going to laugh my ass off.

Why? Because Trump is a low IQ imbecile who has all but projected his guilt at this point.

The reality, outside of your partisan fever dreams, will be that I'll be far more interested in the names that have never been associated with the topic.

Because I, unlike you, actually care about the meat of this matter and not the political games/points it's become.

#78 | Posted by jpw at 2025-07-30 12:17 AM

"already been answered.
#77 | Posted by Alexandrite "

Okay, so what is the answer? Here is the question again:

"Assuming Trump is implicated in the files - why didn't the Biden DoJ/FBI prosecute him for it? Are they pedophile-enablers? They had the files for 4 years - and...nothing? So, again, explain to us all why they did this that does not include the explanation "Because Trump did nothing wrong"

#79 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-30 12:17 AM

what files?

daddy trump says theyre a hoax.

#80 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-07-30 12:18 AM

is trump lying?

#81 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-07-30 12:19 AM

ScottS is one of those shrieking Maenads who have a windshield wiper running to clean the spittle off their monitor.

#73 | Posted by REDIAL

I'm starting to wonder if it's just the rightwing account for rcade.

He throws firebombs with legallyyouredead and plays the stupid MAGA idiot a la Stephen Cobert under S*&^heapS.

#82 | Posted by jpw at 2025-07-30 12:19 AM

"Because Trump is a low IQ imbecile
#78 | Posted by jpw"

Says the guy that graduated at the ass end of a tier 5 university and doesn't have 2 nickels to rub together about the guy that graduated from Wharton, made billions of dollars, and is current the most powerful person in the world.....

You -------- love to talk about Dunning Kruger - but that effect is so strong in yourselves that you lack the ability to apply it internally.

#83 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-30 12:21 AM

its ira. the guy that predicted trump would win the 2020 election with 80% of the black vote.

#84 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-07-30 12:21 AM

" graduated from Wharton"

why is trump hiding his transcripts? lol

#85 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-07-30 12:22 AM

"what files?
daddy trump says theyre a hoax.
#80 | Posted by Alexandrite"

I assume the DoJ/FBI has something - what, we don't know. Could some of those include Democrat fake plants? Yeah, entirely possible after the Russian collusion hoax, the Steele Dossier, etc. However, even with that, I don't think even these fake documents implicate Trump in anything or Biden's DoJ/FBI would have used them already.

But again, answer the question:

#86 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-30 12:23 AM

I'm starting to wonder if it's just the rightwing account for rcade.

It does generate site traffic, but I doubt rcade wants to waste that much of his time. Mind you ScottS is pretty much just a Grokbot anyway.

#87 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-07-30 12:25 AM

lets recap:

Trump ran on releasing the Epstein files.
he didnt.
then they were on pam bondis desk.
then they dont exist.
now theyre a hoax biden and obama wrote
and trumps name was planted in there
but clinton went to the island 28 times and trump "never had the pleasure." his words.

that about cover it, dirtbag?

#88 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-07-30 12:25 AM

"why is trump hiding his transcripts? lol
#85 | Posted by Alexandrite"

Probably because his grades are on par with JPW so he is embarrassed by them.

#89 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-30 12:26 AM

its ira.

Well, yeah. Just the Mk IV model.

#90 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-07-30 12:26 AM

" "Assuming Trump is implicated in the files - why didn't the Biden DoJ/FBI prosecute him for it?"

I already answered that. Theyre sealed. A judge just ruled on it being clear that trumps doj didnt do the proper things to forment their release.

#91 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-07-30 12:27 AM

Probably because his grades are on par with JPW so he is embarrassed by them.

#89 | POSTED BY SCOTTS AT 2025-07-30 12:26 AM | REPLY | FLAG:

so you voted for a moron? that tracks.

#92 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-07-30 12:28 AM

"A judge just ruled on it being clear that trumps doj didnt do the proper things to forment their release.
#91 | Posted by Alexandrite"

That is for the grand jury testimony ------- - not the DoJ/FBI case files that they have had for 5 years since the raid on Epstein's NYC home. So, try again.

#93 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-30 12:31 AM

@#88 ... lets recap: ...

My question on this most august message board at this point becomes...

Why does the scotts alias seem to be so determined to defend Pres Trump on this issue?

Byrds - Chestnut Mare (1970)
www.youtube.com

#94 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-07-30 12:32 AM

"so you voted for a moron?
#92 | Posted by Alexandrite"

Our choices were Trump and DEI Kamala - who is a low IQ moron with an unaccomplished past and a history of poor decision-making. You chose to vote for her regardless. I fully admit that Trump is not the smartest man alive.

#95 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-30 12:33 AM

Why does the scotts alias seem to be so determined to defend Pres Trump on this issue?

Because Scatberg is a------------.

#96 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-07-30 12:34 AM

the ones trump says are a hoax?

youre going to have to admit trump lied at some point, or continue to have zero credibility.

#97 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-07-30 12:35 AM

" Why does the scotts alias seem to be so determined to defend Pres Trump on this issue?"

because he cannot admit he voted for a------------. too much of an ego hit, hence the projection about bidens daughter.

#98 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-07-30 12:36 AM

"the ones trump says are a hoax?
#97 | Posted by Alexandrite"

Them being a hoax or not is irrelevant to my question. So, man up and try to answer it again:

#99 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-30 12:36 AM

"because he cannot admit he voted for a------------.
#98 | Posted by Alexandrite"

If Trump is proven to be a pedo, I have no issue with him getting his neck stretched along with the other pedos. But, as I have proven in the question I continue to ask you - and you do not have the ability to answer - the logical conclusion with what is known today is that Trump did nothing wrong.

#100 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-30 12:39 AM

but clinton went to the island 28 times

I like how Lewzer hesitated just for a second while pulling that number out of his ass.

#101 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-07-30 12:40 AM

@#100 ... If Trump is proven to be a pedo, ...

Is that the real issue in this discussion?

Or is the real issue is the apparent changing of Pres Trump's explanations?

Asked differently, why does Pres Trump seem to be unable to stick with one explanation?

#102 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-07-30 12:54 AM

"Asked differently, why does Pres Trump seem to be unable to stick with one explanation?
#102 | Posted by LampLighter"

You have already asked and I have already answer this ------- with my post #16. Do you have trouble understanding the words or do you have the memory of a goldfish?

#103 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-30 12:57 AM

The tape with the missing minute is the same as the tape they released. There was no missing minute, just more bs conspiracy crap from the party of misinformation (Democrats).

#104 | Posted by visitor_ at 2025-07-30 01:54 AM

#104
You might want to spend more time catching up. Or not.

Try "CBS News investigation of Jeffrey Epstein jail video reveals new discrepancies" (www.cbsnews.com).

#105 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2025-07-30 06:34 AM

"Avaunt and quit my sight! Let the earth hide thee!" said Shakespeare's Macbeth to Banquo's unwelcome ghost.

Minus the eloquence, Trump faces his own haunting in the not-going-away spectre of ...

E
P
S
T
E
I
N

Bon effin appetit, MAGAts.

#106 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2025-07-30 06:40 AM

MAGA

Molesters
Are
Granted
Amnesty

#107 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-07-30 07:49 AM

Biden sat on the Epstein files for 4 years

Because there is a shhtton of donors names in evidence. Follow the $$$. Clinton, Gates, Les Wexner...god only knows who else. Maybe Hunter Biden. That wouldn't surprize me. Hiding a pedo ring is common with the eleites. Has been for, hell, forever. Nobody wants to do it, and now Trump has his dick caught in the ringer.

#108 | Posted by lee_the_agent at 2025-07-30 08:20 AM

"Biden sat on the Epstein files for 4 years"

Yeah. Trump was supposed to fix that.

Now Trump is sitting on the Epstein Files and Republicans couldn't be happier.

#109 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-07-30 08:25 AM

"A week after a House Oversight subcommittee voted to subpoena the Justice Department for records related to Jeffrey Epstein, the chairman of the full committee still hasn't issued the order," the Washington Post reports.

politicalwire.com

The pedo posse continues to protect the-------------.

#110 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-07-30 08:28 AM

Donald Trump had sex with children, and he had Epstein murdered to cover that.

These simple facts may be proven this year or in one hundred years, but they will be proven.

#111 | Posted by Zed at 2025-07-30 08:44 AM

"#107 | Posted by Alexandrite"

The Liberal policies:

FAGA

Feminizing
And
Gaying
America

#112 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-30 09:03 AM

"Assuming Trump is implicated in the files - why didn't the Biden DoJ/FBI prosecute him for it?

JFC. You've asked this stupid question about a half a dozen times and are apparently to dumb to figure out the glaringly obvious answer. Epstein died about 18 months before Biden to office. You can't prosecute dead people. At least, not in this country.

#113 | Posted by et_al at 2025-07-30 09:15 AM

"Assuming Trump is implicated in the files - why didn't the Biden DoJ/FBI prosecute him for it?"

Sure looks like Biden was protecting pedophiles.
So what are Republicans doing?

#114 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-07-30 09:29 AM

Oops, badly misread the question. Nevertheless there's another obvious answer. Whatever misconduct the Bufoon may have engaged in during his Epstein years happened long ago. Can you say "statute of limitations?"

#115 | Posted by et_al at 2025-07-30 09:31 AM

Feminizing
And
Gaying
America

#112 | POSTED BY SCOTTS

So you're in the closet....?

#116 | Posted by Zed at 2025-07-30 09:35 AM

There are no missing minutes on the tape. Someone should tell the millennial analysts at CBS that VCRs are not precision recording devices or a substitute for atomic clocks. VCRs are analog devices for recording and playing analog tapes having physical characteristics that change over time.

#117 | Posted by visitor_ at 2025-07-30 12:52 PM

#117 | Posted by visitor_

The clocks on VCRs are digital, not analogue. Not surprised you don't know the difference.

#118 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2025-07-30 01:17 PM

I have installed and repaired numerous security camera systems. Not one has to reset at midnight or has nightly recording gaps. Which would kind of defeat the whole purpose of security cameras.

#119 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-07-30 01:30 PM

#118 Not surprised you don't understand that the display clock is independent from tape stretch and playback speed variations. You're a millennial right?

#120 | Posted by visitor_ at 2025-07-30 01:35 PM

120 | POSTED BY VISITOR

The Trump-released video is not even of Epstein's cell.

Trump is trying to cover over his guilt, but is being hindered by his own stupidity and hopes that his base is just as dumb as he is.

#121 | Posted by Zed at 2025-07-30 02:10 PM

"tape stretch and playback speed variations."

You live in a world without time codes?

#122 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-07-30 02:21 PM

I have installed and repaired numerous security camera systems. Not one has to reset at midnight or has nightly recording gaps. Which would kind of defeat the whole purpose of security cameras.
#119 | Posted by donnerboy

The lies are sooo obvious.
But, it doesn't matter:
The bigger the lie, the more they believe.

#123 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-07-30 02:23 PM

Not getting into relativity, just because a digital clock says a minute has passed doesn't mean a minute has actually passed. When that time is recorded as an image on tape, it really, really doesn't mean a minute has passed. You sweet summer children don't know how anything works.

#124 | Posted by visitor_ at 2025-07-30 02:37 PM

There are no missing minutes on the tape.

You should tell Bondi. Bondi explains missing minute in Epstein video

Idiot.

#125 | Posted by et_al at 2025-07-30 02:45 PM

just because a digital clock says a minute has passed doesn't mean a minute has actually passed

#124 | POSTED BY VISITOR

To the extent that is true, you have opened whole new vistas into how Trump was able to successfully murder Epstein.

#126 | Posted by Zed at 2025-07-30 02:45 PM

#124 | POSTED BY VISITOR

If this had happened on Biden's watch, you would see the evidence of conspiracy to murder and to hide someone's sick sexual history as being overwhelming.

Face it, Donald's only way out of this Epstein mess is to release the entire files.

That is, of course, if he is innocent.

#127 | Posted by Zed at 2025-07-30 02:48 PM

The lies are sooo obvious.

#123 | POSTED BY SNOOFY

Aren't they, though?

Got to hand it to VISITOR. When it comes to defending his rapist and murdering boss, he got game.

#128 | Posted by Zed at 2025-07-30 02:51 PM

Not getting into relativity, just because a digital clock says a minute has passed
#124 | Posted by visitor_

Now tell us about the Adobe metadata that indicates the video was in fact edited.

You're saying they faked the metadata too?

#129 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-07-30 03:14 PM

Adobe metadata on a VCR tape.

#130 | Posted by visitor_ at 2025-07-30 03:20 PM

Adobe metadata on the digital release of the tape.

#131 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-07-30 03:22 PM

The digital copy was created created how? Most likely an analog playback into a digital capture device. The analog playback being subject to variations in playback speed tape stretch etc.

#132 | Posted by visitor_ at 2025-07-30 03:28 PM

The metadata, it shows the digital copy was edited. Digitally.

#133 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-07-30 03:29 PM

variations in playback speed tape stretch

LOL. Speaking of a "stretch".

#134 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-07-30 03:40 PM

#133 Do you have access to the metadata?

#134 You don't know how VCRs work, do you Summer Child?

#135 | Posted by visitor_ at 2025-07-30 03:51 PM

Posted by Visitor

You're sure doing a lot of shucking and jiving to contradict Bondi. See #125

VCR's d**n sure ain't rebooted which Bondi says is the cause of the gap.

#136 | Posted by et_al at 2025-07-30 04:01 PM

The meta data with screen shots are available in this report. www.cbsnews.com

#137 | Posted by et_al at 2025-07-30 04:06 PM

"#133 Do you have access to the metadata?"

It's embedded in the file.

#138 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-07-30 04:06 PM

The only point Visitor has is on top of his head.

#139 | Posted by lee_the_agent at 2025-07-30 04:10 PM

I'm saying that if you set your VCR to record an hour of TV and then you video capture it to digital, the digital file may not be one hour long.

#140 | Posted by visitor_ at 2025-07-30 04:10 PM

#138 Good, send me a copy.

#141 | Posted by visitor_ at 2025-07-30 04:10 PM

I'm saying that if you set your VCR to record an hour of TV and then you video capture it to digital, the digital file may not be one hour long.
#140 | Posted by visitor_

You have no idea of the facts in this case, do you?
Explain how a mouse pointer from a computer screen was recorded in the "raw footage" from the video camera:

From the link in #137:
The Justice Department said the FBI seized the prison's digital video recorder system, or DVR, containing the raw footage five days after Epstein's death. When federal officials released the jail video, they attested that it was "raw footage," but the presence of a cursor and onscreen menu raise questions about that.

About that metadata:
Stafford, who looked at the video using specialized software to extract the underlying coding, known as metadata, said the metadata showed that the file was first created on May 23 of this year and that it was likely a "screen capture, not an actual export" of the raw file.

#142 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-07-30 04:36 PM

Is it a tape or DVR recording? The article attached to this post uses the word "tape". DVRs don't use tapes.

#143 | Posted by visitor_ at 2025-07-30 05:32 PM

Maybe a tape backup of the hard drive?

#144 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-07-30 05:34 PM

Is it a tape or DVR recording? The article attached to this post uses the word "tape". DVRs don't use tapes.
#143 | Posted by visitor_

Simmer down! The term "tape" in the article is likely used loosely or colloquially to refer to the surveillance footage or recording of Epstein's prison cell.

#145 | Posted by rstybeach11 at 2025-07-30 05:43 PM

If conspiracy nuts are going to pitch a fit over a glitch that happens when a file is being closed and saved, then they damn well better be more precise in what media is being used.

#146 | Posted by visitor_ at 2025-07-30 05:55 PM

SO... it turns out, according to Trump biographer Michael Wolfe, that it was Trump that dropped the dime on Epstein after Epstein threatened to expose Trump's money laundering for a Russian Oligarch:

www.youtube.com

#147 | Posted by Corky at 2025-07-30 06:00 PM

AlSO... Michael Wolff has seen the Polaroids of Trump with two topless girls of indeterminate age:

www.youtube.com

#148 | Posted by Corky at 2025-07-30 06:10 PM

conspiracy nuts

#146 | POSTED BY VISITOR

Epstein is merely a conspiracy (finally) against MAGA tastes.

It's funny seeing you guys have to eat your own vomit. All this stuff started with you.

#149 | Posted by Zed at 2025-07-30 06:11 PM

conspiracy nuts

#146 | POSTED BY VISITOR

It's all in Trump's hands to shoot this down.

But he won't. He can't.

That's because he's guilty as hell.

#150 | Posted by Zed at 2025-07-30 06:12 PM

Simmer down! The term "tape" in the article is likely used loosely or colloquially to refer to the surveillance footage or recording of Epstein's prison cell.

That would be my guess too but, according to the copy of the article shown in the video at 1 (about 4+ minutes in), the article doesn't use the word "tape." That and Bondi makes it d**n clear it's digital video. Also whoever heard of a VCR that could record round the clock. That would be a huge tape whereas my memory is they maxed out at about 2 hours.

#151 | Posted by et_al at 2025-07-30 06:21 PM

They could have been recording on SLP mode and getting 6 hours.

Great way to save money.

#152 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-07-30 06:26 PM

Donald Trump has to pay for sex when he's not raping someone.

#153 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-07-30 08:03 PM

Drudge Retort Headlines

How Trump Demolished the White House East Wing (71 comments)

Gavin Newsom Says He Will Consider White House Run After 2026 Elections (43 comments)

Florida Will Be Hardest Hit by Spike in Obamacare Costs (41 comments)

Timothy Mellon is Trump's $130M Mystery Military Donor: NYT (29 comments)

Farmer Calls Out Trump (23 comments)

Flights to LAX Halted (21 comments)

Trump says he will Ban Early Voting for Midterms in Panicked Rant (16 comments)

ICE Racing to Deport Abrego Garcia ahead of Criminal Proceedings (15 comments)

Trump 'would love' Unconstitutional Third Term (15 comments)

Republicans Thought Democrats Would Cave on the Shutdown. (15 comments)