Federal immigration officers are asserting sweeping power to forcibly enter people's homes without a judge's warrant, according to an internal Immigration and Customs Enforcement memo obtained by The Associated Press, marking a sharp reversal of longstanding guidance meant to respect constitutional limits on government searches.
Chillingly, the whistleblower says that ICE trainers were directed (no paper trail?) to train all of ICE's new recruits that these administrative warrants authorize breaking into peoples' homes, even though DHS's own training materials still make clear that's illegal!
-- Aaron Reichlin-Melnick (@reichlinmelnick.bsky.social) Jan 21, 2026 at 5:12 PM
[image or embed]
*** ICE Monster Use Five-Year-Old Son as Bait to Capture Father ***
This is a bunch of real Lieutenant Columbos, ain't they?
And look how heavily-armed the Border Patrol agent is for the streets of America.
He looks like he's ready for ISIS or the Taliban.
The only "fix" for ICE and DHS is casting it lock, stock, and barrel into the four winds by Executive Order signed by the non-Republican Party POTUS immediately after being sworn in on 20 January 2029.
Source: apnews.com
*** USAG Pam Bondi Proudly Bleats FBI Captured Two Church Protestors ***
The FBI has nothing better to do.
And Hillbilly hypocrite JD Vance promises prison sentences for ICE protestors.
Source: www.2news.com
Would these "administrative" warrants hold up before the supreme court?
~ Galaxy
Probably ...
Interesting tidbit, since immigration/removal is a civil proceeding, the FifthAmendement doesn't apply.
supreme.justia.com
Second, although in a criminal procedure, the court must instruct the jury that it cannot draw an inference of guilt from a defendant's failure to testify about facts relevant to his case, Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609 (1965), in civil cases, "the Fifth Amendment does not forbid adverse inferences against parties to civil actions when they refuse to testify in response to probative evidence offered against them." Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308, 318 (1976).
www.litigationandtrial.com(1923)).
If you're a here legally speak up, silence can be admission of guilt, carry and show your ID, while you don't have to carry one an officer can detain you until your ID is established.
The FBI has nothing better to do.
They went after people that prayed at an abortion clinic, and you said nothing.
Drudge Retort Headlines
U.S. Troops Told Iran War Is for 'Armageddon' (127 comments)
3 Dead, 14 Hurt in Austin Bar Shooting (45 comments)
Oil Prices Expected to Increase (36 comments)
3 F-15 Strike Eagles in Kuwait 'mistakenly shot down' (34 comments)
RFK Jr. Suggests Buying Liver or 'cheap cuts' Instead of Steak (31 comments)
US Moving Pregnant Immigrant Girls to Texas (25 comments)
Top MAGA Voices Furious over Iran Attack (24 comments)
Trump: US Could Carry Out 'Friendly Takeover' of Cuba (19 comments)
U.S. 'Secretary of War' Bizarrely Claims: 'We Didn't Start This War' (18 comments)
Trump's Iran Strikes Came at Behest of an 'unusual pair' of Allies: report (16 comments)
