We just won Missouri v. Biden. As Missouri's Attorney General, I sued the Biden regime for brazenly colluding with Big Tech to silence Missouri families " censoring the truth about COVID, the Hunter Biden laptop, the open border, and the 2020 election. They tried to turn Facebook, X, YouTube, and the rest into their private speech police, labeling dissent "misinformation" while they pushed their narrative on the American people. Today, after years of unrelenting litigation, we deep state into a historic 10-year, court-enforceable Consent Decree. It directly binds the Surgeon General, the CDC, and CISA: no more threats of legal, regulatory, or economic punishment. No more coercion. No more unilateral direction or veto of platform decisions to remove, suppress, deplatform, or algorithmically bury protected speech.
@#19 ... Where government steps in and stops the "let's eat tide pods challenge", because people are dying from it left and right ... ?
That's the hill you're trying to die on??? ...
An area hospital...
Danbury's outdoor hospital could treat variety of patients (2020)
www.newstimes.com
... Crews progressed Thursday on installing the 25-bed tented facility that Danbury Hospital says would be equipped to handle a surge in patients due to the coronavirus.
Danbury Hospital has not decided when or how it plans to use the facility, which is expected be fully set up outside the hospital by mid-day Friday in a city that is recording the third-highest number of cases in the state.
But it is meant to prepare the hospital for a potential influx of patients that is straining hospitals in nearby New York and has overwhelmed health systems in Italy and Spain
"We're developing the mobile field hospital as a what if' and looking a number of different scenarios for how we could use this field hospital," said Matthew Cassavechia, director of emergency medical services at Danbury Hospital. ...
@#31
You're off this evening.
I would have expected a better comment from you.
I mean, your "Secretary of Bar" comment ( drudge.com ) was quite apropos.
Jus' sayin'
;)
... what is the point of this ruling. [sic]
It's not a "ruling." It's a Consent Decree. More commonly known as a settlement agreement. As is common with settlements there is no admission of the factual or legal basis for the claims or positions of the parties. It applies to no one else. It can only be enforced by the named parties. It establishes no precedent.
17. The parties acknowledge that this Agreement is entered into solely for the purpose of settling and compromising any remaining claims in this action without further litigation, and, except as stated explicitly in the text of the Agreement, it shall not be construed as evidence or as an admission regarding any issues of law or fact, or regarding the truth or validity of any allegation or claim raised in this action or in any other action.nclalegal.org
As such, the settlement is not an example of federal censorship. It's another Buffoon TACO in the face of deadlines requiring it to disclose the evidentiary basis for it's claims of Biden censonship.
Drudge Retort Headlines
DOJ Accidentally Gave Congress 'Damning Evidence' Against Trump: Rep Raskin (37 comments)
Amid Chaos and War, Donald Trump Visits Graceland (29 comments)
Trump Casts Mail Ballot Again in Florida (27 comments)
NTSB Probes Controller as Part of Investigation LGA Crash (27 comments)
How Trump Killed Conservatism (27 comments)
Jury Finds Meta, YouTube Negligent (20 comments)
Quoting the Bible, More Democrats Lean Into Being Christian (18 comments)
Unaffordable America: Wealth Gap at Modern-Day High (17 comments)
GOP Cracks in Senate Begin to Show in DHS Shutdown Fight (17 comments)
Explosion at Texas Refinery (16 comments)