" This is something JPW and Danforth have lectured me that it never happened."

The fact Zuckerberg never mentioned what he was "censored" about proves it was something idiotic, like the "let's eat Tide pods" challenge.

You can bet the house if it was something that would make the censors look ludicrous, he would've blurted it out.

And did you see the claim?!? At the center of it, this guy is lying about the 2020 elections ... Again.

And Bellringer is carrying water for it. What a non-surprise.

" Authoritarian jackhloles will abuse powers given to them."

But enough about TikTok.

Let me guess: you would have let the "you can't die from an overdose of ivermectin" guy keep going, even if there was an epidemic of folks being killed by ivermectin overdoses.

You're the reason we have to have public health laws.

" On the one hand, he claims censorship didn't happen"

No, I claimed that you couldn't find any examples of the Biden government censoring media outlets.

I also pointed out if the editorial board agrees with the governments suggestion, that's not censorship. I asked for any examples where the editorial board disagreed, and the government forced them into decisions they didn't want.

You never found any. The "Twitter files" was all about editorial boards doing what editorial boards are supposed to do.

And as I pointed out upthread, when Zuckerberg complained of the government "yelling at him", he never bothered saying about what.

Anybody who doesn't think that's telling for the manchild is an idiot.

" on the other hand he extolls the virtues of censorship."

Where government steps in and stops the "let's eat tide pods challenge", because people are dying from it left and right ... ?

That's the hill you're trying to die on???

(The real irony: you probably will.)

" (it quite clearly did, according to this court)"

Did you miss the guy's summation? He was proud that he gets to keep telling his lies.

Turns out you're a proud boy as well.

" you always pick the most extreme examples and act as if those were the ONLY things that were censored."

That's because even the most extreme ones you're against censoring.

You've NEVER drawn a line. Anywhere. Somebody puts out malinformation that kills people??? You're ready to carry water for the fatal advice.

"and act as if those were the ONLY things that were censored."

This guy is claiming lies about Hunter Biden's laptop, lies about an "open border", and lies about Trump wining the 2020 election.

And you're leading the parade.

"what is the point of this ruling."

Cherry-picking your judge and your venue werks!

"labeling dissent "misinformation""

"Dissent" being anyone who pointed out bleach up the wazoo would kill you.

"Why do you act like nothing happened?"

Because the moron can't answer the same questions you can't answer.

If Rudy had a copy, what was keeping him from exposing what he had?
If it was censorship, why did Fox News, Newsmax, and the other right-wing outlets go along?
If 2020 was stolen, when will you be presenting the first bit of proof INSIDE a courtroom?
And don't get me started on the "open border" lies.

He's just lucky he found an idiot of a judge. MO's Aileen Cannon.

"the settlement is not an example of federal censorship. It's another Buffoon TACO in the face of deadlines requiring it to disclose the evidentiary basis for its claims of Biden censonship."
~Et_Al

Jesus, Bellringer, I've never seen you with so much egg on your face. Omelettes for everyone!!!