Big loss for federal censorship regime

Wednesday, March 25, 2026

We just won Missouri v. Biden. As Missouri's Attorney General, I sued the Biden regime for brazenly colluding with Big Tech to silence Missouri families " censoring the truth about COVID, the Hunter Biden laptop, the open border, and the 2020 election. They tried to turn Facebook, X, YouTube, and the rest into their private speech police, labeling dissent "misinformation" while they pushed their narrative on the American people. Today, after years of unrelenting litigation, we deep state into a historic 10-year, court-enforceable Consent Decree. It directly binds the Surgeon General, the CDC, and CISA: no more threats of legal, regulatory, or economic punishment. No more coercion. No more unilateral direction or veto of platform decisions to remove, suppress, deplatform, or algorithmically bury protected speech.

Posted by BellRinger at 07:45 PM | 99 COMMENTS | permalink | Comment on This Entry |

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

This is something JPW and Danforth have lectured me that it never happened.

#1 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-03-25 07:45 PM | Reply

... They tried to turn Facebook, X, YouTube, and the rest into their private speech police, labeling dissent "misinformation" ...

Were those who spoke out against the COVID policies at the time spreading disinformation?

The legal win seems to be more about free speech than the truth of that speech.

#2 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-03-25 08:08 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"the truth about COVID, the Hunter Biden laptop, the open border, and the 2020 election"

What MAGA believes as the "truth" about COVID was harmful disinformation and lies, what they published about Hunter Biden's laptop was lies, "the open border" was a lie, and the lies about the "2020 election" helped foment treason. Harmful misinformation and disinformation should be censored

#3 | Posted by hamburglar at 2026-03-25 08:46 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

This is something JPW and Danforth have lectured me that it never happened.
#1 | Posted by BellRinger

Yes, much like the voter fraud that the SAVE act protects us from never happened.

#4 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-03-25 08:50 PM | Reply

" Harmful misinformation and disinformation should be censored

#3 | POSTED BY HAMBURGLAR AT 2026-03-25 08:46 PM | FLAG: "

This is exactly y why we have 1A. Authoritarian jackhloles will abuse powers given to them.

#5 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-03-25 08:58 PM | Reply

What should be censored? Name some things.

#6 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-03-25 08:59 PM | Reply

Obviously the lies about Trump losing the 2020 Election are.... just as stupid as all the rest of this oblivious X post thread.

#7 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-25 09:07 PM | Reply

"No more unilateral direction or veto of platform decisions to remove, suppress, deplatform, or algorithmically bury protected speech."

The only speech these guys ever advocate for is...
Nazi speech.

#8 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-03-25 09:10 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

" This is something JPW and Danforth have lectured me that it never happened."

The fact Zuckerberg never mentioned what he was "censored" about proves it was something idiotic, like the "let's eat Tide pods" challenge.

You can bet the house if it was something that would make the censors look ludicrous, he would've blurted it out.

#9 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-03-25 09:16 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

And did you see the claim?!? At the center of it, this guy is lying about the 2020 elections ... Again.

And Bellringer is carrying water for it. What a non-surprise.

#10 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-03-25 09:18 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

" Authoritarian jackhloles will abuse powers given to them."

But enough about TikTok.

Let me guess: you would have let the "you can't die from an overdose of ivermectin" guy keep going, even if there was an epidemic of folks being killed by ivermectin overdoses.

You're the reason we have to have public health laws.

#11 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-03-25 09:21 PM | Reply

What should be censored? Name some things.

Late-night talk show hosts,
Puerto Rican pop stars,
any news org. critical of Trump,
info about what is happening in Iran.

I'm sure I missed a bunch of others.

#12 | Posted by horstngraben at 2026-03-25 09:32 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

I knew Danforth would be in tears over this ruling. On the one hand, he claims censorship didn't happen (it quite clearly did, according to this court) on the other hand he extolls the virtues of censorship.

#13 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-03-25 09:33 PM | Reply

This is exactly y why we have 1A. Authoritarian jackhloles will abuse powers given to them.

Posted by BellRinger at 2026-03-25 08:58 PM | Reply

You're just mad that RCADE banned your Jeff account and you can't use it anymore. Cry me a river.

#14 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2026-03-25 09:36 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#14. This has nothing to do with Rcade.

#15 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-03-25 09:42 PM | Reply

@#13 ... I knew Danforth would be in tears over this ruling. ...

Why does your current trolling always seem to make its replies ad hominem attacks, instead of addressing the issues raised?

Oh, yeah, as it has stated... more replies.

#16 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-03-25 09:47 PM | Reply

-You're just mad that RCADE banned your Jeff account and you can't use it anymore. Cry me a river.

I thought he reinstated Jeff's account.

#17 | Posted by Eberly at 2026-03-25 09:47 PM | Reply

" On the one hand, he claims censorship didn't happen"

No, I claimed that you couldn't find any examples of the Biden government censoring media outlets.

I also pointed out if the editorial board agrees with the governments suggestion, that's not censorship. I asked for any examples where the editorial board disagreed, and the government forced them into decisions they didn't want.

You never found any. The "Twitter files" was all about editorial boards doing what editorial boards are supposed to do.

And as I pointed out upthread, when Zuckerberg complained of the government "yelling at him", he never bothered saying about what.

Anybody who doesn't think that's telling for the manchild is an idiot.

#18 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-03-25 10:07 PM | Reply

" on the other hand he extolls the virtues of censorship."

Where government steps in and stops the "let's eat tide pods challenge", because people are dying from it left and right ... ?

That's the hill you're trying to die on???

(The real irony: you probably will.)

#19 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-03-25 10:09 PM | Reply

" (it quite clearly did, according to this court)"

Did you miss the guy's summation? He was proud that he gets to keep telling his lies.

Turns out you're a proud boy as well.

#20 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-03-25 10:11 PM | Reply

" No, I claimed that you couldn't find any examples of the Biden government censoring media outlets. "

So, what is the point of this ruling.

And you always pick the most extreme examples and act as if those were the ONLY things that were censored.

#21 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-03-25 10:16 PM | Reply

@#21 .... So, what is the point of this ruling. ...

Good question.

What is the point of this ruling?

Yer up ...

#22 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-03-25 10:18 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

@#19 ... Where government steps in and stops the "let's eat tide pods challenge", because people are dying from it left and right ... ?

That's the hill you're trying to die on??? ...

An area hospital...

Danbury's outdoor hospital could treat variety of patients (2020)
www.newstimes.com

... Crews progressed Thursday on installing the 25-bed tented facility that Danbury Hospital says would be equipped to handle a surge in patients due to the coronavirus.

Danbury Hospital has not decided when or how it plans to use the facility, which is expected be fully set up outside the hospital by mid-day Friday in a city that is recording the third-highest number of cases in the state.

But it is meant to prepare the hospital for a potential influx of patients that is straining hospitals in nearby New York and has overwhelmed health systems in Italy and Spain

"We're developing the mobile field hospital as a what if' and looking a number of different scenarios for how we could use this field hospital," said Matthew Cassavechia, director of emergency medical services at Danbury Hospital. ...

#23 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-03-25 10:24 PM | Reply

" you always pick the most extreme examples and act as if those were the ONLY things that were censored."

That's because even the most extreme ones you're against censoring.

You've NEVER drawn a line. Anywhere. Somebody puts out malinformation that kills people??? You're ready to carry water for the fatal advice.

#24 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-03-25 10:25 PM | Reply

@#22 ... Good question.

What is the point of this ruling? ...

In my view, (in a nutshell) ...

I saw area hospitals setting up treatment tents in their parking lots to treat those affected by COVID.

And this ruling seems to say that the goverment, charged with protecting us, cannot issue guidelines to avoid COVID.

But some objected to the government trying to keep people safe.

And we wound up with this opinion.

#25 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-03-25 10:29 PM | Reply

"and act as if those were the ONLY things that were censored."

This guy is claiming lies about Hunter Biden's laptop, lies about an "open border", and lies about Trump wining the 2020 election.

And you're leading the parade.

#26 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-03-25 10:30 PM | Reply

"what is the point of this ruling."

Cherry-picking your judge and your venue werks!

#27 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-03-25 10:31 PM | Reply

" Missouri v. Biden"

Why do you act like nothing happened?

#28 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-03-25 10:32 PM | Reply

"labeling dissent "misinformation""

"Dissent" being anyone who pointed out bleach up the wazoo would kill you.

#29 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-03-25 10:33 PM | Reply

"Why do you act like nothing happened?"

Because the moron can't answer the same questions you can't answer.

If Rudy had a copy, what was keeping him from exposing what he had?
If it was censorship, why did Fox News, Newsmax, and the other right-wing outlets go along?
If 2020 was stolen, when will you be presenting the first bit of proof INSIDE a courtroom?
And don't get me started on the "open border" lies.

He's just lucky he found an idiot of a judge. MO's Aileen Cannon.

#30 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-03-25 10:37 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Trump is a ----------- ---.

#31 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-03-25 10:49 PM | Reply

@#23 ... Crews progressed Thursday on installing the 25-bed tented facility that Danbury Hospital says would be equipped to handle a surge in patients due to the coronavirus. ...

And, major kudos to Danbury Hospital for having a plan to deal with such emergencies.

We often forget how the medical community had rallied, big time, during the COVID pandemic.

I, for one, want to cite that awesome ~rise to the occasion.~

#32 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-03-25 10:51 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

@#31

You're off this evening.

I would have expected a better comment from you.

I mean, your "Secretary of Bar" comment ( drudge.com ) was quite apropos.

Jus' sayin'

;)

#33 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-03-25 10:55 PM | Reply

" He's just lucky he found an idiot of a judge"

I take it you can refute the majority opinion.

#34 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-03-25 10:59 PM | Reply

#21

You're a stupid ------- ----, you stupid bitch. ---- off and die you gutless coward.

#35 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-03-25 10:59 PM | Reply

#34

---- off ----

#36 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-03-25 10:59 PM | Reply

... what is the point of this ruling. [sic]

It's not a "ruling." It's a Consent Decree. More commonly known as a settlement agreement. As is common with settlements there is no admission of the factual or legal basis for the claims or positions of the parties. It applies to no one else. It can only be enforced by the named parties. It establishes no precedent.

17. The parties acknowledge that this Agreement is entered into solely for the purpose of settling and compromising any remaining claims in this action without further litigation, and, except as stated explicitly in the text of the Agreement, it shall not be construed as evidence or as an admission regarding any issues of law or fact, or regarding the truth or validity of any allegation or claim raised in this action or in any other action.

nclalegal.org

As such, the settlement is not an example of federal censorship. It's another Buffoon TACO in the face of deadlines requiring it to disclose the evidentiary basis for it's claims of Biden censonship.

#37 | Posted by et_al at 2026-03-25 11:03 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

From the X (Twitter) comment cited ...

...Today, after years of unrelenting litigation, we deep state into a historic 10-year, court-enforceable Consent Decree. It directly binds the Surgeon General, the CDC, and CISA: no more threats of legal, regulatory, or economic punishment.

No more coercion.

No more unilateral direction or veto of platform decisions to remove, suppress, deplatform, or algorithmically bury protected speech....

So, "coercion."

Not, "suppression."

If I may ask, were the guidelines issued by the Biden administration a dictum to suppress what was being said?

Or were they guidelines to help Americans stay alive during the COVID crisis?

And, in response, please cite the actual dicta of the Biden administration.

thx.

#38 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-03-25 11:09 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

This is something JPW and Danforth have lectured me that it never happened.

#1 | Posted by BellRinger

This isn't what you think it is, moron.

Schmitt is a piece of s*&^. Like Hawley, he used the office of MO AG to springboard to higher office and wasted taxpayer time and dollars to move his own ambitions forward.

This "win" he's crowing about it anything but. It's meaningless. Did you even bother looking into what a Consent Decree is?

How can you be so f*&^ing stupid to fall for the political theater bulls*&^ over and over and over and over...?

#39 | Posted by jpw at 2026-03-26 12:03 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"the settlement is not an example of federal censorship. It's another Buffoon TACO in the face of deadlines requiring it to disclose the evidentiary basis for its claims of Biden censonship."
~Et_Al

Jesus, Bellringer, I've never seen you with so much egg on your face. Omelettes for everyone!!!

#40 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-03-26 12:20 AM | Reply

So, what is the point of this ruling.

It's a settlement without any legal liability or admission of guilt or wrongdoing.

Overseen by a Trump appointee with a trash record.

en.wikipedia.org

Your desperation is sad, dude.

#41 | Posted by jpw at 2026-03-26 12:20 AM | Reply

@#41 ... Your desperation is sad, dude. ...

Yeah, but his current trolling alias generates ad revenue for the site.

So, there's that...

;)

#42 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-03-26 12:32 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Ballwasher the ------- coward

#43 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-03-26 01:05 AM | Reply

It's a settlement without any legal liability or admission of guilt or wrongdoing.
Overseen by a Trump appointee with a trash record.
en.wikipedia.org

Your desperation is sad, dude.

#41 | Posted by jpw

I sometimes wonder precisely how dumb Jeff is.

Then he answers it for us all.

#44 | Posted by Sycophant at 2026-03-26 10:11 AM | Reply

"you always pick the most extreme examples and act as if those were the ONLY things that were censored."

Then you pick some.
Tell us the things that were censored.
Tell us some extreme things that were censored.
Tell us some more mundane things that were censored.

You can't do it, can you?

#45 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-03-26 12:14 PM | Reply

" In the intervening years, I've had to think about this a lot. I had to think about it last week. I had to think about it yesterday, and again today. Friends and colleagues regularly challenge the utility of a court case and scandal that allowed Trump and his own more-than-questionable approach to speech issues a chance to prevail in 2024, by capitalizing on Joe Biden's idiotic government-wide jawboning program.

To this I ask, what was the alternative? Letting it go? A ruling permitting the behaviors detailed in Missouri v. Biden would have been far more devastating. If you're concerned about a hyper-empowered chief executive intent on deamplifying, say, derogatory content about the war in Iran, you need it enshrined in law that threats and pressure to social media companies are strictly forbidden. In that regard, everyone irrespective of party should be happy about this result."

www.racket.news

Well said.

#46 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-03-26 12:16 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

Not Danforth, or JPW or Sycophant. I swear the concept of precedent and the concept of what goes around comes around in politics is completely lost on those who can't see past the end of their nose.

#47 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-03-26 12:18 PM | Reply

"what goes around comes around"

What went around?
When's it coming back?

You can't do that either.

#48 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-03-26 12:24 PM | Reply

Jeff.
My goodness.
I feel sorry for you.

You celebrate the vengeful stupidity cycle at your own expense.

#49 | Posted by YAV at 2026-03-26 12:36 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

" vengeful stupidity cycle "
~Yav

Nailed it.

(Unrecognized) Newsworthy Flag

#50 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-03-26 12:41 PM | Reply

" I swear the concept of precedent..."

The lawyer just told you this has ZERO to do with precedent.

Hey Gunga, could I get some Nothingburgers with my Omelettes?

#51 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-03-26 12:43 PM | Reply

Ballwasher is still desperate for this to be a thing.

You do know SCOTUS ruled against them 6-3, right?

en.wikipedia.org

Why did they lose? They failed to show injury traceable to government actions, ie the "censorship" didn't happen.

Keep flailing over things long done and settled so you can avoid dealing with the unmitigated disaster you voted for.

#52 | Posted by jpw at 2026-03-26 12:44 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

I swear the concept of precedent

You haven't even read anything surrounding what you're crowing about.

You're just taking Schmitt's D team "victory" and treating it as if it's substantial.

Meanwhile, in the real world, actual adults see that the "win" is akin to the halftime fan trivia contest where the winner got a free souvenir mug and hat as the home team gets spanked 6-3.

#53 | Posted by jpw at 2026-03-26 12:46 PM | Reply

"Why did they lose? They failed to show injury traceable to government actions"

Let me guess the three who didn't care if the legal threshold wasn't met or not.

#54 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-03-26 12:55 PM | Reply

I would love for you all to seriously answer why you are so enamored with government censorship.

Are you all sad that Biden's government disinformation board was cancelled in its infancy?

Also, that 2024 SCOTUS ruling that JPW is crowing about was a procedural issue that was sent back to the lower courts. It wasn't the "victory" that you are crowing about. Not your fault though, the media on which you rely for your information is pretty bad at what it does. Garbage-in, garbage-out.

#55 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-03-26 12:55 PM | Reply

I would love for you all to seriously answer why you are so enamored with government censorship.

There was no censorship in this case.
There is a TON of it going on now, but you don't say a thing about it.

#56 | Posted by YAV at 2026-03-26 12:58 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Biggest troll on the DR posts trolling thread?

What a stupid piece of shht, waste of time BullBringer is.

Anything to deflect from Trump and Republicans spreading fascism across America.

Way to bring the bullshht, BullBringer.

#57 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-03-26 01:05 PM | Reply

I'm just so relieved we finally have an agreement that "applies to no one else~~. It~~ can only be enforced by the named parties~~.It~~ (and) establishes no precedent."
(hat tip to Et_Al)

#58 | Posted by YAV at 2026-03-26 01:10 PM | Reply

Yav,

I oppose government censorship. Period. Whether it's direct or through private tech proxies like during the last administration.

#59 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-03-26 01:13 PM | Reply

60!

#60 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-03-26 01:17 PM | Reply

#61 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-03-26 01:17 PM | Reply

#62 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-03-26 01:17 PM | Reply

#63 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-03-26 01:17 PM | Reply

#64 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-03-26 01:17 PM | Reply

#65 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-03-26 01:17 PM | Reply

#66 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-03-26 01:17 PM | Reply

#67 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-03-26 01:18 PM | Reply

#68 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-03-26 01:18 PM | Reply

69!

#69 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-03-26 01:18 PM | Reply

Trump raped Children.

Trump fucked 13 year old children.

He forced children to suck his gross, wart covered, mushroom dick

Trump is BullBringer's hero.

BullBringer dreams of younger, skinnier days. Days when he too could have raped children like his fellow republicans.

#70 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-03-26 01:21 PM | Reply

When I'm not here, I'll be spending time on Reddit and other social media encouraging Trumpers to take ivermectin for whatever ails them. The fishtank cleaner (obviously) because the pharmaceutical grade is now compromised by leftists.

Sodium Bromide (NaBr) is the only safe salt. Chlorine is toxic, and sodium chloride is industrial waste. Leftist feed us this industrial waste to keep us dumb.

Only drink purified water like distilled water, or even better, de-ionized water if you can get it. Ions are free radicals. Leftists are also radicals.

My favorite targets are Trumper kids. They're highly impressionable, and I save us a lot of trouble in the future.

And I'll be DAMNED if they try to censor me!

#71 | Posted by horstngraben at 2026-03-26 01:23 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

I oppose government censorship.
#59 | POSTED BY BULLBRINGER

I haven't seen you on a single thread discussing Trump's censoring of America. No one else has either.

Thats because you cheer it on.

What you oppose is censorship of republican lies and misinformation.

#72 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-03-26 01:24 PM | Reply

When BullBringer works his shift at the truck stop, he pretends all the dicks he's sucking belong to 13 year old girls.

It helps him feel like he's getting closer to Trump.

#73 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-03-26 01:28 PM | Reply

Don't homos hate being grouped with pedos?

#74 | Posted by eberly at 2026-03-26 01:31 PM | Reply

"What you oppose is censorship of republican lies and misinformation."

Don't forget MALinformation.

He's pals with mals.

#75 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-03-26 01:33 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

Yea, I wouldn't like to be grouped with Trump or BullBringer, that's true.

What was your question?

#76 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-03-26 01:34 PM | Reply

Don't forget MALinformation

Ahhh nice!

Yes yes.

He's pals with mals.
#75 | POSTED BY DANFORTH

He likes them better than gals.

#77 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-03-26 01:41 PM | Reply

I guess I have to ask......what are you supposed to be thinking about when you're sucking dick at the truck stop?

#78 | Posted by eberly at 2026-03-26 01:42 PM | Reply

what are you supposed to be thinking about when you're sucking dick at the truck stop?

Now this is worthy of scientific research!

Off the top of my head:

Gay guys - dick

Straight guys - the thrill of secretly getting a chance to suck a dick.

Pedophiles - children

#79 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-03-26 01:46 PM | Reply

Are there female truckers? I'd wager a good many are lesbians.

I hope they have a truck stop glory hole of their own.

I do believe in equality!

#80 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-03-26 01:48 PM | Reply

#55 | Posted by BellRinger

I'm not crowing about it, numbnuts, I'm pointing out your ignorance of the fact that it was ruled that the parties didn't have evidence of actual injury.

You know what that means? It means the government actions didn't censor them.

Is that plain enough for your dumb a&& to get?

#81 | Posted by jpw at 2026-03-26 01:54 PM | Reply

You're being trolled.

#82 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-03-26 01:55 PM | Reply

I would love for you all to seriously answer why you are so enamored with government censorship.

We're not you dumb f*&^.

It wasn't there to begin with except in the minds of dips*&^s like you who were being manipulated with rage bait like "The Twitter Files."

#83 | Posted by jpw at 2026-03-26 01:56 PM | Reply

I oppose government censorship. Period. Whether it's direct or through private tech proxies like during the last administration.

#59 | Posted by BellRinger

No, you don't dumbf*&^.

Go to any CBS/Barri Weiss thread and you'll be prancing about throwing out every excuse and deflection you can think of.

#84 | Posted by jpw at 2026-03-26 01:57 PM | Reply

Pedo Jeff in a nutshell

Biden: "Social Media sites should ban fake doctors and foreign agents from posting disinformation illegally."
Pedo Jeff: "It's a nightmare! Worst censorship ever!"

Pedo Trump: "We should execute reporters and revoke broadcast licenses for those who don't lie to support of me!"
Pedo Jeff: "This is good. Also I love underage children too!"

#85 | Posted by Sycophant at 2026-03-26 01:57 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

For four years all we heard from you was "dduuuuuhhhhh PrAvDaAz!!

Now that our media is slowly being aggregated into a form that is the most state media-like it's ever been, you're nothing but excuses and bulls*&^ from years ago that was nothing then and is nothing now.

#86 | Posted by jpw at 2026-03-26 01:58 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Who are we supposed to believe, you or our lying eyes?

#87 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-03-26 01:59 PM | Reply

You've proven over and over again that your "lying eyes" can't see for s*&^, Mr Magoo. You fall for fauxrage bait constantly and continue believing it's real even after it's been shown to be fake.

You strike me as the kind of person who would be in a study and would be found to change their views subconsciously once they were cut off from their usual sources of information/media.

#88 | Posted by jpw at 2026-03-26 02:05 PM | Reply

BullBringer has yet to comment on the Trump administration's censorship of American journalism.

You know, Actual censorship of news and media sources reporting, which has stopped reporting on:

The Epstein files.

The continuing assaults on American cities by ICE.

The continued destruction of the federal government.

The Devaluing the dollar.

The truth about the unnecessary wars we're involved in. (As opposed to simply showing Trump and Hogsbreath lying to us.)

The continuous shutting down Congress.

The Trump administration ignoring the judiciary.

Trump and Kushner selling out the executive branch.

Trump's continued demolition of the White House.

The flooding in Hawaii.

The fire in Nebraska.

Etc etc etc ...

#89 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-03-26 02:11 PM | Reply

Who are we supposed to believe, you or our lying eyes?
#87 | POSTED BY BULLBRINGER

You're supposed to believe Trump.

His opinions are your facts.

You're sick in the head, nothing more than a soulless ghoul feeding on the energy of anyone willing to respond to your trolling bullshht.

#90 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-03-26 02:15 PM | Reply

" Go to any CBS/Barri Weiss thread and you'll be prancing about throwing out every excuse and deflection you can think of.

#84 | POSTED BY JPW AT 2026-03-26 01:57 PM | FLAG: "

Show me one. You have the. 60Minutes piece which was an EDITORIAL decision. Perhaps a bad decision but not one jawboned into compliance by the government which is something you normally cheer.

#91 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-03-26 02:30 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

"Perhaps a bad decision but not one jawboned into compliance by the governmen"

Sorry, but since the government influenced who got the job to MAKE that decision, your head should be exploding.

What are your (R)easons? What's (D)ifferent?

#92 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-03-26 02:48 PM | Reply

The government didn't appoint Weiss.

#93 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-03-26 03:15 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

Sure and Russia didn't help Trump win in 2016.

You pedophiles are morons.

#94 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-03-26 03:21 PM | Reply

The government didn't appoint Weiss.

#93 | Posted by BellRinger