Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Friday, February 16, 2024

Donald Trump's legal team has lashed out at Special Counsel Jack Smith's request to the Supreme Court not to delay the former president's federal election obstruction trial further by taking up an immunity appeal.

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

On Wednesday, Smith urged the Supreme Court to allow a previous ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit that rejected Trump's claims of absolute immunity to remain as the country has a "compelling interest" to see the former president brought to trial quickly.

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

"Trump has pleaded not guilty to four charges as part of Smith's investigation into his alleged criminal attempts to overturn the 2020 Election results. Proceedings are currently on hold as Trump's legal team ask the Supreme Court to rule on whether he can cite absolute immunity to dismiss the case, as the allegations relate to Trump's time as president.

Trump, the expected 2024 Republican presidential nominee, has frequently faced accusations that he is taking every step possible to try and delay the start of the federal election trial until after November in the hopes that if he wins the race, he could then demand the Department of Justice drops the federal case once he enters office."

.

The Speedy Trial Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides,

"In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial...".[1] The Clause protects the defendant from delay between the presentation of the indictment or similar charging instrument and the beginning of trial."

You know, to protect people from being held long term for trial.... which is a feature, not a bug for the innocent.

#1 | Posted by Corky at 2024-02-16 11:53 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

Looking forward to the time when Trump rages from a jail cell.

#2 | Posted by Zed at 2024-02-16 11:58 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 4

Dementia don is not being prosecuted because he is running.

He is running to escape from being held accountable for his crimes.

#3 | Posted by Nixon at 2024-02-16 12:36 PM | Reply | Funny: 1 | Newsworthy 6

Heinz shares doubled today.
National strategic ketchup reserves critically low

#4 | Posted by northguy3 at 2024-02-16 08:52 PM | Reply | Funny: 7

4

that's hilarious!

#5 | Posted by Corky at 2024-02-16 09:14 PM | Reply

I'm so innocent of the charges from this witch hunt that I will be stringing these cases out until I'm re-elected so I can pardon myself from these crimes I did not commit. Anyway I'm too busy running for office and after I'm elected I'll have plenty of time to fight these false charges ...
-Stable Genius

#6 | Posted by catdog at 2024-02-16 11:04 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 3

What doesn't Donald Trump rage about?

The man is obviously unhinged and mentally ill.

#7 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2024-02-16 11:19 PM | Reply

"To destroy False Prophet, must first unmask him in eyes of Believers." - Charlie Chan, "Charlie Chan at Treasure Island" 1939 - Sidney Toler

#8 | Posted by Corky at 2024-02-16 11:24 PM | Reply

Trump is like a skinwalker. At various times he's a Mafia Boss, sometimes a Hitler 2.0, sometimes a traitorous stooge for Russia's expansion and sometimes like a sociopathic serial stalker in a Hollywood horror movie.

You never know when you turn on the TV which mask he'll be wearing.

#9 | Posted by Twinpac at 2024-02-16 11:51 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 3

Well, in the huge off chance that Trump reads this site, I would like to mention to him that his legal strategy of insulting any judge in his court cases, to their face, in their courtroom, prior to a judgement, well, it just isn't working, and maybe trying a little humility and experimenting with the experience of offering an apology might be in order. Just a thought, from a non lawyer.
I am not experienced in international intrigue, but since they gave you back your passport, maybe heading for the hills, or at least Moscow, for an extended stay might be in order. Jail really, really is unpleasant for one who is worried about germs. Maybe you get house arrest but...

#10 | Posted by Hughmass at 2024-02-17 06:17 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

The orange pig continues to squeal.

#11 | Posted by bat4255 at 2024-02-17 06:32 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

This kind of says it all:

"Their complete lack of contrition and remorse borders on pathological. They are accused only of inflating asset values to make more money. The documents prove this over and over again. This is a venial sin, not a mortal sin. Defendants did not commit murder or arson. They did not rob a bank at gunpoint. Donald Trump is not Bernard Madoff. Yet, defendants are incapable of admitting the error of their ways," Engoron wrote.

OCU

#12 | Posted by OCUser at 2024-02-17 11:46 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

BTW, for every week that this judgement is not paid, an additional $1 million in interest is incurred, which I assume is compound interest.

And being such a brilliant businessman, Trump should know how this works.

OCU

#13 | Posted by OCUser at 2024-02-17 11:52 AM | Reply

"for every week that this judgement is not paid, an additional $1 million in interest is incurred"

Close, but not quite. It's about $614,400.

Math: ($355M *.09) / 52

#14 | Posted by Danforth at 2024-02-17 12:14 PM | Reply

How long does it typically take for a case of this nature to go to trial after charges are filed?

I'm asking because I do not know.

#15 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-02-17 12:22 PM | Reply

@#15 ... a case of this nature ...

Has there been "a case of this nature" previously?

How many fmr Presidents have been indicted for such a serious criminal offense?

#16 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-02-17 12:27 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"How long does it typically take for a case of this nature to go to trial after charges are filed?"

The answer is ... yes, this is exactly how long a case "of this nature" takes.

#17 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-02-17 12:39 PM | Reply

Can I get a serious answer?

#18 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-02-17 12:48 PM | Reply

@#18 ... Can I get a serious answer? ...

Want better answers? Ask better questions.

I'd start with...

Have there been cases "of this nature" before?


My first guess would be: no.

That renders moot the question in #15.


#19 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-02-17 01:01 PM | Reply

HUGHMASS @ #10

"Well, in the huge off chance that Trump reads this site,"

You better hope it's an off chance. Otherwise Rcade will be getting a subpoena and we'll all be getting a visit from some Mafia looking tough guys with crooked noses because we said bad things about Donald Trump.

#20 | Posted by Twinpac at 2024-02-17 05:52 PM | Reply

"for every week that this judgement is not paid, an additional $1 million in interest is incurred"

Close, but not quite. It's about $614,400.

Math: ($355M *.09) / 52

#14 | Posted by Danforth

They've already added interest and it's compounded. The current amount that Trump owes is $453 million. Still not quite a million a week, but it's getting closer.

OCU

#21 | Posted by OCUser at 2024-02-17 09:25 PM | Reply

It is the defendant who has the right to speedy trial, not the prosecution. The defendant nearly always waives that right, and can employ a variety of tactics to delay proceedings, if it is to their benefit to do so. The court wil usually indulge defendants requests to prevent avenues for mistrial or appeal.

I can't speak to "cases of "this nature", but I don't think I've ever seen a felony trial get to trial in a year. 5 years after I retired I was still getting subpoenaed to testify in Homicide cases, and I'm still testifying ifor appeals. I'm involved in two civil cases currently that have been running for four and seven years.

I only had about 3 cases where the defendant invoked speedy trial, and they ended in aquittals, because were unprepared. 6 months is not long enough to get witnesses located, deposiitions recorded, records subpeonad, crime scenes reconstructed, motions filed and heard, but the biggest problem was getting DNA and micro evidence back in time.

#22 | Posted by Miranda7 at 2024-02-18 09:15 AM | Reply | Funny: 1

It is the defendant who has the right to speedy trial, not the prosecution. The defendant nearly always waives that right, and can employ a variety of tactics to delay proceedings, if it is to their benefit to do so. The court wil usually indulge defendants requests to prevent avenues for mistrial or appeal...

#22 | Posted by Miranda7

I believe that the courts have ruled that the 'Speedy Trial Act of 1974', while the primary purpose was to codify the provisions of the 6th Amendment, which guarantees a defendant to the speedy trial, that this act also affords a right to the state (i.e. prosecution) to a speedy trial since it's in the best interest of the people that trials not be dragged-out unnecessarily.

And to that point, some states, such as California, has enacted laws which explicitly states the people (i.e. the citizens of the state) also deserve a speedy trial as it's in their best interest that judicial issues be adjudicated quickly.

OCU

#23 | Posted by OCUser at 2024-02-18 02:14 PM | Reply

Oh,I agree in principle, the longer cases go on the less reliable witnesses are, sometimes they move away or even die. Prosecutors and judges are very concerned about denying motions and continuances that could be grounds for an appeal or mistrial.

#24 | Posted by Miranda7 at 2024-02-18 09:49 PM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2024 World Readable

Drudge Retort