It's always amazing how Bellringer literally never has a clue what's going on or how the world works...especially laws.

If it's not throwing strawmen into a debate on something completely unrelated, it's unabashed gaslighting, which is why I call him "Strawlighter". FTA:

Finger-pointing is dishonest to a grotesque extreme. Thurman's death is not due to her choice to take medication abortion, which has a mortality rate of .0003%, which is 1 in every 377,000 cases. (Out of 377,000 women who give birth, in contrast, 83 will die.) Thurman, as the report makes clear, would have almost certainly survived if she had received the pre-Dobbs standard of care, which is an immediate removal of an incomplete miscarriage. But Georgia's law, as written, makes this a felony. As ProPublica explained:

It prohibits doctors from using any instrument "with the purpose of terminating a pregnancy." While removing fetal tissue is not terminating a pregnancy, medically speaking, the law only specifies it's not considered an abortion to remove "a dead unborn child" that resulted from a "spontaneous abortion" defined as "naturally occurring" from a miscarriage or a stillbirth.

[Strawlighter is] lying about this, so here is a link to the bill. As anyone can see, no exception is made to cover emergency care for a woman who deliberately induced her own miscarriage. Abortion opponents are insisting the doctors would not have gotten in legal trouble for saving Thurman's life. However, this is not how the law is written. But even if it was, doctors still had every reason to be afraid. If Thurman had received timely medical care and survived, a right-wing prosecutor could argue she wasn't that sick to begin with. That's the double bind of these supposed "exceptions."

I simply do not understand why his level of disinformation is tolerated on this blog. You can almost put a clock to it, what he claims is almost either false or gaslighting. It's disgusting.