Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Friday, March 07, 2025

One of the chief economic officials in President Donald Trump's administration recently admitted that prices for imported goods subjected to Trump's tariffs will indeed go up, and that the administration is in support of automating more factory jobs.

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

Howard Lutnick, Trump's billionaire buddy turned commerce secretary, has confirmed that the administration was simply lying to MAGA supporters about not touching Social Security and Medicare.

[image or embed]

-- The New Republic (@newrepublic.com) March 2, 2025 at 6:44 PM

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

"officials in President Donald Trump's administration recently admitted that prices for imported goods subjected to Trump's tariffs will indeed go up"

Posted by jpw at 08:40 AM

Trump himself hasn't admitted it.

So no MAGA who comes here will admit it.

So no MAGA anywhere will admit it.

Even when all share the same more expensive reality.

#1 | Posted by Zed at 2025-03-07 08:50 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

the administration is in support of automating more factory jobs.

Posted by jpw

It raises the question of who human society is for?

#2 | Posted by Zed at 2025-03-07 08:51 AM | Reply

It raises the question of who human society is for?

#2 | Posted by Zed at 2025-03-07 08:51 AM | Reply

The rich and well connected people. That's it. The rest of society will be left to twist in the wind.

#3 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-03-07 08:53 AM | Reply

The rich and well connected people. That's it.

#3 | Posted by LauraMohr

So, the rich and well-connected will manufacture and sell to only other rich and well-connected people?

#4 | Posted by Zed at 2025-03-07 08:59 AM | Reply

If Trump wants to do away with the human element, charity begins at home.

#5 | Posted by Dbt2 at 2025-03-07 09:41 AM | Reply

It's funny to think of Boomers voting for their grandkids unemployed.

#6 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-03-07 11:13 AM | Reply

newrepublic.com

This blog is really reading-in in their nearly-month-old post

"House GOP Reveals Plan to Devastate Medicaid and Food Stamp Programs"

...the text doesn't mention Medicaid ...

...seems to indicate that SNAP (the food stamp program) will be cut...

my observation: newrepublic.com is engaged in irrational propaganda featuring speculative lies headlined as fact.

#7 | Posted by itchypossum at 2025-03-07 11:50 AM | Reply

Thanks again, Trump voters...for nothing!

#8 | Posted by e1g1 at 2025-03-07 11:54 AM | Reply

" my observation: newrepublic.com is engaged in irrational propaganda featuring speculative lies headlined as fact."

My observation: Itchy can't tell us where they're going to find $800 billion if they don't cut Medicaid.

Not if he's using actual math.

#9 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-03-07 11:54 AM | Reply

archive.is

MSN is here, per SOP, bending their reportage of the (America-hating) CNBC interview to elicit outrage.
The pre-inflated interview quote is candid and common-sensible-

"I think if you want to buy things from other countries, and you want to bring it into America, then the price is going to rise," Lutnick said. "But if you make it here, then of course the price won't rise! So make it here! Make. It. Here. How hard is that to say? You know, just keep repeating it to yourself: There's no tariff if you make it here."

Of course, the MSN headline becomes-
"Prices are 'going to rise' and 'robots' will be doing factory jobs: Trump Cabinet official"

-As if prices haven't been rising already, and automation of simple tasks is a new phenomenon introduced by Bad Orange Man

#10 | Posted by itchypossum at 2025-03-07 12:02 PM | Reply

"the text doesn't mention Medicaid"

Maybe the problem is that you have to finish high school to learn how to read between the lines:

www.newsweek.com

Did Medicaid Get Cut? What House Budget Resolution Means for Health Care

The budget, which calls for $2 trillion in spending cuts in total, does not mention Medicaid specifically but it directs the House Energy and Commerce Committee, which oversees Medicaid, to cut $880 billion in spending over the next decade.

Trump has said multiple times that Medicaid would not be affected, telling Fox News last week that it would not be "touched."

But the House Energy and Commerce Committee would have to find this money, out of Medicaid, Medicare and the Children's Health Insurance Program.

#11 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-03-07 12:04 PM | Reply

There's no tariff if you make it here.

And how is that going to stop the flow of Fentanyl into the US?

#12 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-03-07 12:08 PM | Reply

"I think if you want to buy things from other countries, and you want to bring it into America, then the price is going to rise"

Remember when Republicans supported the opposite of this, called free trade?

Why were Republicans wrong about supporting free trade?

I would like a Republican to explain it to me.

#13 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-03-07 12:10 PM | Reply

#13
Not a Republican, but the explain is:
Unbalanced trade agreements are a result of corrupt insider deals implemented by elected officials from both parties. They all make deals to enrich themselves and their lobbyists' interests.

#14 | Posted by itchypossum at 2025-03-07 12:27 PM | Reply

"Unbalanced trade agreements are a result of corrupt insider deals implemented by elected officials from both parties."

You gonna explain how tariffs are going to fix that?

Or do you yourself not know?

Help me out here.

#15 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-03-07 12:33 PM | Reply

#11
Audit medicaid for fraud waste and abuse /= bad

Any solution short of universal care is pandering to the industry the true authors and beneficiaries of the ACA.

#16 | Posted by itchypossum at 2025-03-07 12:38 PM | Reply

You gonna explain how tariffs are going to fix that?

Reciprocal tariffs eliminate unfair advantage to foreign competition.
Why does the left support slave labor?
Because that's the effect of offering zero tariffs to countries that charge US companies tariffs to access their markets. It's probably a great deal for the lobbyists and the elected officials that they pay off, but for you and me it's not a good deal. The trade deficit is translated into debt, which now enslaves US taxpayers to 1T yearly just on usury. If you want to talk about free trade, we should be charged zero tariffs as well as applying zero tariffs. It's not "free" for US.

#17 | Posted by itchypossum at 2025-03-07 12:49 PM | Reply

Audit medicaid for fraud waste and abuse

#16 | Posted by itchypossum

That isn't happening?

Why do you think that Trump isn't making it happen?

#18 | Posted by Zed at 2025-03-07 12:50 PM | Reply

Reciprocal tariffs eliminate unfair advantage to foreign competition.

#17 | Posted by itchypossum

Irrational.

#19 | Posted by Zed at 2025-03-07 12:58 PM | Reply

"Reciprocal tariffs eliminate unfair advantage to foreign competition."

Tariffs take the unfair advantage you're talking about, and make it an additional cost to those without the advantage.

How does that remove the unfair advantage?

All it does is make people playing fair pay a surcharge.

#20 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-03-07 01:01 PM | Reply

Audit medicaid for fraud waste and abuse

#16 | Posted by itchypossum

That isn't happening?

Why do you think that Trump isn't making it happen?

#18 | POSTED BY ZED

He immediately fired all the IG Inspectors and auditors whose primary purpose was to expose eliminate and prevent fraud waste and abuse.

Why would a US President do that?

So he could implement his own fraud waste and abuse unhindered.

Obviously.

#21 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-03-07 01:04 PM | Reply

We'll be sure to start doing all manufacturing domestically starting this afternoon. By Monday morning everything should be fine, right?

#22 | Posted by cbob at 2025-03-07 01:33 PM | Reply

Unbalanced trade agreements are a result of corrupt insider deals

No, it's the result of decades of Republican policy and an economic system that demands maximal growth in perpetuity.

90% of the stuff maga has their panties wadded over are problems that they s^%* all over libruls over when the libruls pointed them out. They've only started recognizing them as problems because they now effect their lives. They were perfectly content with a town losing 50% of its jobs when the local factory was offshored because it made stuff cheaper for them. Point out that you can only offshore so much and it would reach a critical point? Well, you we're a commie or soshulizt or any of a dozen buzzwords they don't understand.

#23 | Posted by jpw at 2025-03-07 02:16 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

The Golden Age of America!!!

#24 | Posted by hamburglar at 2025-03-07 02:39 PM | Reply

"Unbalanced trade agreements are a result of corrupt insider deals"

In 2020, Trump replaced NAFTA with USMCA.

Trump created the unbalanced trade agreement.

#25 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-03-07 02:51 PM | Reply

Something on Automation. I believe it is 100% needed but it is NOT inexpensive and still requires people. In fact it requires people that are not your average factory workers today. You have to outlay a massive amount of money to build the machinery and it requires years of time and THEN you have maintain it. I know lot about manufacturing and automation. One of the things I am involved with is automation. Americans are not great workers by and large. The farther right they are, the more useless they seem to be IMHO. Not to mention loud, obnoxious and entitled.

The average machine where I presently work is now over $500k. Most are like $750k. These are basically standard off the shelf machines in the industry. Annual maintenance on them is in the order of $150-200k. Then you have to have operators to run them. An operator can be trained to setup and run them competently in 3-4 years. And the top manufacturers are in Germany, Switzerland, Czechia and Australia. There is one American maker and they are sub par. All the parts are made overseas as well. The other thing is the average person who is learning to run these machines is NOT well paid and I have to say about half of them shouldn't be running them but you work with what you can get.

Another example, a long time ago I worked at a Tech startup funded by the owner of a US machine maker. I actually helped them out from time to time. They made custom automated manufacturing solutions primarily for Automotive. The average machine they worked on at the time was about $10 million and they had to layout the cash to build these machines until paid by the customer. The build time was typically 3-5 years. The company had messed up on a machine that delivery was refused on and lost in court basically because of owner arrogance which was a blow. About a year later they were put out of Business by Delphi who refused to accept and pay for a machine that machined brake rotors. That machine today would probably run $35-40 million but back then was $12 million. The problem they claimed is it didn't meet the specification even though they had several check points along the way. The sad thing is that machine was built to the spec but the Delphi engineer building the spec messed up and the product was not to spec. But a small company that had fronted millions already couldn't take on a billion dollar company in court. Sadly I work with the putz that messed up that spec.

I could go on and on.

#26 | Posted by GalaxiePete at 2025-03-08 03:12 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort