Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Tuesday, June 10, 2025

It is the first time since 1965 that a president called National Guard troops to respond to civil unrest without a governor's official request for assistance, according to Elizabeth Goitein, the senior director of the Brennan Center's Liberty and National Security Program.

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

"Peace through strength" in a domestic setting is a means of authoritarianism. The Trump administration is manufacturing a crisis in order to give him more power. It's un-American.[image or embed]

-- The Lincoln Project (@lincolnproject.us) Jun 9, 2025 at 10:11 AM

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Didn't seem to have the power to use troops to defend the Capital of the United States; that should answer thw question about whether or not he needs a Governor's approval to deal with relativelt peaceful protests in LA. Trump is using National Guard troops to create the most violent confrontation he can engineer because he's looking for an excuse to declare Marshall law and a military coup with him, of course, President for life, which I must admit, I don't pray at night for it to be long.

#1 | Posted by danni at 2025-06-10 09:17 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

ZERO

------- NAZIS OUT OF L.A. NOW

#2 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2025-06-10 10:58 AM | Reply

Here is the take of an experienced former prosecutor:

www.nationalreview.com

#3 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-06-10 12:55 PM | Reply

Here is the take of an experienced former prosecutor:

#3 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

What do Nazis hunters have to say about it?

#4 | Posted by Zed at 2025-06-10 01:00 PM | Reply

"Here is the take of an experienced former prosecutor:"

You're joking, right?

"...rioting, arson, and potentially lethal attacks on law enforcement agents in California. Those, however, are muted by the left's longstanding endorsement of political violence and illegal immigration."

Neither side "endorses" political violence, nor "illegal immigration".

I see now where you get your cockamamie ideas: from partisan hacks who'll barf ANYTHING, and know you'll carry water, regardless.

#5 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-06-10 01:07 PM | Reply

Interesting point DellBinger

FTA:
You can't prattle on about the "rule of law" while endorsing "sanctuary cities" " designed as sanctuaries from the rule of law. Pick a side.

#6 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-06-10 01:28 PM | Reply

You can't prattle on about the "rule of law"

Says the -------- who voted for a felonious rapist

#7 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-06-10 01:33 PM | Reply

Sanctuary CITIES are LEGAL.

#8 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2025-06-10 06:47 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

"..rioting, arson, and potentially lethal attacks on law enforcement agents in California. Those, however, are muted by the left's longstanding endorsement of political violence and illegal immigration."

The insurrection in the Capital and the associated hunts for Mike Pence and Nancy Pelosi with the spoken intentions by the insurrectionists to kill them happened and forever changed the definition of political violence from an angry protester throwing a rock to an actual attenpt to overthrow the government and Trumo dealt with it by watching TV in the dining room of the White House while ignoring multiple requests that he call out the National Guard which he just ignored. Now with relatively minor crimes ov violence being successfully dealt with bu local police who have not asked for National Guard back-up, Trump does everything he can to escalate the violence because that will give him an excuse to declare Marshall Law and begin rounding up troublemakers like journalists, politicians ans everyone else that dares to challenge the legitimacy of his dictatorial powers. The only people he's fooling now are people who don't pay attention to what's going on and his MAGA followers who are fine eliminating the Constitition and the rule of law.

#9 | Posted by danni at 2025-06-10 06:53 PM | Reply

Sanctuary CITIES are LEGAL.
#8 | Posted by Effeteposer

Of course they are if you don't care about federal laws.

No one says you have to cooperate to make the country safer.

That's why it's lawless.

#10 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-06-10 07:02 PM | Reply

#9

Broken record. Trump 27/7/365

People have agency, if they didn't react by your own definition Trump couldn't escalate.

#11 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-06-10 07:04 PM | Reply

It's 24/7/365 you pud.

#12 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-06-10 07:10 PM | Reply

Saying sanctuary cities are legal, is like saying Federal Law doesn't exist within individual states. Our country has an international border and it is the DUTY of our military to protect it. Not protecting that established border and leaving it open to whomever wishes to cross it means you have no sovereignty as a nation. Ultimately it means you have no country - but I guess the John Lennon crowd loves the thought of that.

#13 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2025-06-11 09:37 AM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort