Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Wednesday, May 08, 2024

Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene on Wednesday officially triggered a vote on her motion to remove House Speaker Mike Johnson, but within minutes it was overwhelmingly rejected.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

"By passing the Democrats' agenda and handcuffing the Republicans' ability and influence legislation, our elected Republican Speaker Mike Johnson has aided and abetted the Democrats and the Biden administration in destroying our country," Greene said.

Johnson was on the House floor with his leadership team as Greene read her resolution.

The House quickly moved to hold a vote on a motion to table, or effectively kill, Greene's effort to oust Johnson.

House Majority Leader Steve Scalise rose to request the vote on tabling Greene's resolution, which passed with overwhelming bipartisan support. The final vote to dismiss of Greene's motion was 359-43 with seven lawmakers voting present.

Greene's move Wednesday was a sudden shift after she appeared to be backing off her weekslong threat following back-to-back meetings with Johnson on Monday and Tuesday."

/

So... I'm just guessing, but it sounds like her long talks with Mikey failed. She's like the Hamas of the House.

#1 | Posted by Corky at 2024-05-08 06:11 PM | Reply

Bring it on!

#2 | Posted by REDIAL at 2024-05-08 06:15 PM | Reply

... By passing the Democrats' agenda and handcuffing the Republicans' ability and influence legislation, our elected Republican Speaker Mike Johnson has aided and abetted the Democrats and the Biden administration in destroying our country," ...

What country is she speaking about?

Certainly not the United States of America.

#3 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-05-08 06:15 PM | Reply

@#1 ... The final vote to dismiss of Greene's motion was 359-43 with seven lawmakers voting present. ...

So, it's over?

By approximately a 9-to-1 margin, the House told her she is stuffed with manure?

#4 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-05-08 06:20 PM | Reply

Here's her rant to the House...

www.youtube.com

#5 | Posted by Corky at 2024-05-08 06:21 PM | Reply

So, it's over?

I hope not. She did say she would keep doing it.

#6 | Posted by REDIAL at 2024-05-08 06:25 PM | Reply

her rant is worth seeing.... every time she mentions Jeffries, the Dems start cheering, and most of the Repubs are booing her

#7 | Posted by Corky at 2024-05-08 06:26 PM | Reply

her rant is worth seeing....

In a Monty Pythonesque sort of way.

#8 | Posted by REDIAL at 2024-05-08 06:38 PM | Reply

Not even Jewish space lasers could help MTG.

The vote failed, 359-43.

www.msnbc.com

#9 | Posted by lee_the_agent at 2024-05-08 06:40 PM | Reply

Probably America responding to Rep Greene's ~love~ of America...

Tuff Darts - [Your Love Is Like] Nuclear Waste (1978)
www.youtube.com

Lyrics excerpt...

www.flashlyrics.com

...
I'd rather crawl through poison ivy
or grab high tensions wires
cut my legs off at the knees
or set myself on fire
Than have to feel your charms
closing in around me
or feel your slimy kisses covering my body

Your love is like a nuclear waste
your body is a danger to the human race
they should stamp contaminated right across your face
your love is like a nuclear waste

I'd rather stick my tongue into a vat
drink ex-lax all day long
or have to chew on razor blades
or--------- to king kong
Than have to be between the sheets with you for any time
or have to feel your scaly flesh moving onto mine
...


#10 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-05-08 06:47 PM | Reply

The vote failed, 359-43.

I wonder who the 43 were? And the 7 too chicken to vote?

#11 | Posted by REDIAL at 2024-05-08 06:48 PM | Reply

@#11 ... I wonder who the 43 were? And the 7 too chicken to vote? ...

It took some digging due to the recency, but here is what I found...

Roll Call 188 | Bill Number: H. Res. 1209
clerk.house.gov

... Declaring the office of Speaker of the House of Representatives to be vacant ...


All individual votes are shown.


#12 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-05-08 07:01 PM | Reply


What country is she speaking about?
Certainly not the United States of America.
#3 | POSTED BY LAMPLIGHTER

You aren't really paying attention are you.
www.nytimes.com

You need to understand how the Republicans are thinking if you are going to defeat them, this is why the current tribalism is losing for the Democrats, they aren't offering to fix anything other than other countries. The rest of America is watching this and wondering.

Your thread on AirportCulture is directly related, the question is can you understand the relationship.

#13 | Posted by oneironaut at 2024-05-08 07:04 PM | Reply | Funny: 3

@#13 ... You need to understand how the Republicans are thinking ....

Yeah, I'd say they think their view of the autocratic White Nationalist country that the United States should become is the America (their "country") of the future.

What's not to understand about that?



#14 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-05-08 07:15 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 3

Reenactment of Today in the House....

www.youtube.com

#15 | Posted by Corky at 2024-05-08 08:01 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

Why are dems helping Johnson?

#16 | Posted by truthhurts at 2024-05-08 08:10 PM | Reply

Here's her rant to the House...
www.youtube.com
#5 | POSTED BY CORK

Funny how she mentions 5 Jan 6 insurrectionists who committed suicide, but no mention of the cops that killed themselves after jan 6

#17 | Posted by truthhurts at 2024-05-08 08:14 PM | Reply

17

I noticed that right away.... the Cops suicides didn't count, rwingers said, as deaths due to the J6 insurgency riot. But suicides by J6 rioters apparently do.

Squaw talk with forked toungue!

16

Yeah, can you imagine Republicans EVER helping the Dems stop themselves from imploding yet again, just to keep the Country running?

Country over Party is unique indeed.

#18 | Posted by Corky at 2024-05-08 08:19 PM | Reply

17
I noticed that right away.... the Cops suicides didn't count, rwingers said, as deaths due to the J6 insurgency riot. But suicides by J6 rioters apparently do.
Squaw talk with forked toungue!
16
Yeah, can you imagine Republicans EVER helping the Dems stop themselves from imploding yet again, just to keep the Country running?
Country over Party is unique indeed.
POSTED BY CORKY AT 2024-05-08 08:19 PM | REPLY

www.nbcnews.com

DOJ finds police officer's suicide after Jan. 6 attack was a death in the line of duty
Jeffrey Smith's death resulted in legislation that allows families of officers who die by suicide following traumatic events to receive death benefits.

#19 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2024-05-08 08:24 PM | Reply

@#16 ... Why are dems helping Johnson? ...

Because the Democrats may feel that bi-partisanship is better than extremist-minority-rule?

That' my first guess.


#20 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-05-08 08:27 PM | Reply

Why are dems helping Johnson?

I'm hoping it's just to drive Empty G off the deep end, but it's probably more complicated that that.

#21 | Posted by REDIAL at 2024-05-08 08:28 PM | Reply

How many bills has the Republican lead house passed in a year and a half?

How about concentrating on winning the 2024 elections and staving off fascism.

#22 | Posted by truthhurts at 2024-05-08 08:29 PM | Reply

Why are dems helping Johnson?
#16 | POSTED BY TRUTHHURTS

Country first.

#23 | Posted by Clownshack at 2024-05-08 08:32 PM | Reply

@#22 ... How many bills has the Republican lead house passed in a year and a half? ...

You mean this?


Republican Congressman Melts Down Asking What His Party's Even Doing (November 2023)
www.yahoo.com

... Representative Chip Roy went scorched earth on his Republican colleagues on Wednesday, haranguing them for years wasted on inaction and chaos as opposed to doing their jobs.

The Texas Republican and Freedom Caucus member spent his time on the House floor on Wednesday shouting and wildly gesticulating at his caucus, condemning them for capitulating on promises by working with Democrats and lamenting the party's transparently vacuous approach to building a border wall.

"One thing. I want my Republican colleagues to give me one thing. One. That I can go campaign on and say we did," Roy said. "One!"

"Anybody sitting in the complex, if you want to come down to the floor and come explain to me one material, meaningful, significant thing the Republican majority has done besides well, I guess it's not as bad as the Democrats,'" Roy lamented. ...


That sort of thing?

#24 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-05-08 08:36 PM | Reply

All I could find is that Jeffries prolly got some concessions from Johnson, including money for the ACP broadband program.

Proving that one does indeed have to bribe Republicans to get anything for seniors.

#25 | Posted by Corky at 2024-05-08 08:40 PM | Reply

@#25 ... All I could find is that Jeffries prolly got some concessions from Johnson ...

I do not disagree.

... including money for the ACP broadband program. ...

Not yet willing to agree on specifics.

I'll just go back to my comment (#20)

Because the Democrats may feel that bi-partisanship is better than extremist-minority-rule?

#26 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-05-08 08:45 PM | Reply

"Still, Jayapal said she'd expect to see further concessions if Democrats protect Johnson, rattling off demands such as renewing an expiring "Affordable Connectivity Program" that helps low-income households afford broadband service."

www.usnews.com

#27 | Posted by Corky at 2024-05-08 08:48 PM | Reply

All I could find is that Jeffries prolly got some concessions from Johnson, including money for the ACP broadband program.

Proving that one does indeed have to bribe Republicans to get anything for seniors.
#25 | POSTED BY CORKY

So, what you are saying is that Dems are both easy AND cheap.

#28 | Posted by truthhurts at 2024-05-08 08:51 PM | Reply

Because the Democrats may feel that bi-partisanship is better than extremist-minority-rule?
#26 | POSTED BY LAMPLIGHTER

How does this vote today further that goal?

#29 | Posted by truthhurts at 2024-05-08 08:52 PM | Reply

IOW you think next September when they are arguing over funding the government that Republicans will do anything for dems or the country? Esp. when chaos will improve -------- chances at winning the election?

#30 | Posted by truthhurts at 2024-05-08 08:53 PM | Reply

@#28 ... So, what you are saying is that Dems are both easy AND cheap. ...

Neither.

The Democrats may have seen an opportunity to work in a bi-partisan manner to achieve some of their goals.


#31 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-05-08 09:11 PM | Reply

@#30 ... IOW you think next September when they are arguing over funding the government that Republicans will do anything for dems or the country? ...

That all depends upon the risks that the Democrats and the Republicans would face.

Let me say, I do not think that this bipartisan agreement that says Rep Greene is a sack of manure is going to solve all the issues facing Congress. Far from that.

I look at it as one quite specific bi-partisan determination.

Please see my #10 for details of my opinion on that determination.


:)


#32 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-05-08 09:16 PM | Reply

So, what you are saying is that the dems got some chump change in exchange for saving Johnson's ass and the promise for bipartisan action on all sort of stuff in an election year.

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

Easy, cheap and stupid-that's what dems are.

#33 | Posted by truthhurts at 2024-05-08 09:16 PM | Reply

There is one question that dems should have asked themselves.

Does this vote help or harm our chances of winning in November

NOTHING ELSE MATTERS!

#34 | Posted by truthhurts at 2024-05-08 09:18 PM | Reply

@#33 ... So, what you are saying is that the dems got some chump change in exchange for saving Johnson's ass ...

That is to be determined.

Too soon to tell.

#35 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-05-08 09:51 PM | Reply

@#34 ... There is one question that dems should have asked themselves. ...

They are politicians.

Do you not think they have already themselves that very question?


This vote seems to be the answer they arrived at.

Sooooo... what's yer point?


#36 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-05-08 09:54 PM | Reply

@#34 ... There is one question that dems should have asked themselves. ...
They are politicians.
Do you not think they have already themselves that very question?

This vote seems to be the answer they arrived at.
Sooooo... what's yer point?

#36 | POSTED BY LAMPLIGHTER

My point is that the dems would be better served if the face eating leopard party were eating each other's leopard faces for the next 6 months.

#37 | Posted by truthhurts at 2024-05-08 09:57 PM | Reply

@#37 . ... My point is that the dems would be better served if the face eating leopard party were eating each other's leopard faces for the next 6 months. ...

Isn't that what occurred here?

By not supporting the Rep Greene resolution, the Democrats have shown a major chasm in the Republican Party.

One that even an extremist Republican has called to the fore...

(see #24)

So, by cooperating with Republicans, are the Democrats really showing that Republicans cannot govern by themselves?



#38 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-05-08 10:27 PM | Reply

38

Dems might feel that the voters current outlet for their angst; blaming any problems on the current Pres rather than where they might actually fall, could worsen if the far far right runs the House.

Considering that education level is the bigger predictor of elections now, rather than race, they might figure rwingers are too dumb to place the blame where it belongs and-or not inclined to do so no matter what they think.

We'll see what Jeffries gets, and how it plays out.

#39 | Posted by Corky at 2024-05-08 10:28 PM | Reply

One article I saw...

House overwhelmingly unites against Marjorie Taylor Greene
www.axios.com

Wow.

#40 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-05-08 11:36 PM | Reply

The twunt got bitch slapped.

Good.

#41 | Posted by Nixon at 2024-05-09 07:05 AM | Reply

Does this vote help or harm our chances of winning in November

Well it shows that democrats are reaching across the aisle to work with the GOP, something that voters on both sides say is important.

However, when most GOP voters say they want bipartisan solutions, what they really want is democrats to capitulate to ALL gop demands.

This move was directed at independents who are the swing votes in every district across the nation.

#42 | Posted by Nixon at 2024-05-09 07:09 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Why are dems helping Johnson?
#16 | POSTED BY TRUTHHURTS
Country first.

Lol. No.
Military Industrial Complex/ Imperial War Machine first.

#43 | Posted by pumpkinhead at 2024-05-10 08:27 AM | Reply

Hopefully this is the beginning of the end for that gutter trash and any shred of influence she had or has. Her and Boebert can't fade away fast enough.

Although, if Trump wins and she's elevated to any position of power, expect some insane fireworks as she takes her retribution on every single Repub who voted against this. This is a grudge she'll nurse forever.

#44 | Posted by jpw at 2024-05-10 11:32 AM | Reply

__________
#16 | Posted by truthhurts at 2024-05-08 08:10 PM
Why are dems helping Johnson?

They are helping themselves, because it took 6 months for them to understand the mistake they made by effectively voting for a tiny Gaetz-MTG-Boebert++ MAGA faction instead of abstaining or voting to table the bill when it was exactly the same situation with Speaker McCarthy, who was a lot more pragmatic (he pushed through the government funding bill well before the usual "deadline crisis" drama) and had understanding with Nancy Pelosi that he would be backed in any "no-confidence" vote and have a working relationship on essential bills the leaderships and majorities in both parties were interested in. Both understood that with the GOP's razor-thin nominal majority (and Speakership that goes with it) and a split with MAGA faction, the Democrats were de-facto majority, without whom no major bills could be passed. IOW, to do what they could with what they had.

Unfortunately, Nancy Pelosi was out of town during the vote and the "children" failed to vote AGAINST Gaetz-MTG-Boebert faction, which would essentially end their "reign of terror" and influence and may have resulted in getting Gaetz booted out of Congress (similarly to George Santos). I even remember that some people here fantasized about several Republicans voting for Jeffries to make him Speaker, while refusing to accept de-facto control of agenda and "take the win" and vote against MAGA nutcases because "... but McCarthy!"

It also took 6 months for idiot Mike Johnson to understand that he is not going to be Speaker / Minority Leader in the next Congress, and get off his butt to "do the right thing" and call votes for some essential bills that both sides (in unequal measures) wanted to be passed, and that Senate has already passed on bipartisan basis months before.
__________

#45 | Posted by CutiePie at 2024-05-10 08:15 PM | Reply

__________
#45 | Posted by CutiePie at 2024-05-10 08:15 PM

A good article on the many reasons for the working relationship :

www.thedailybeast.com - Congress' Odd Couple - Jeffries and Johnson - Mystifies Lawmakers - May 06, 2024

|------- The GOP speaker and the Democratic leader have a totally unique political relationship. Do they have any personal relationship at all?

... Jeffries told reporters in February that he had a "functional relationship" with Johnson. The Speaker, meanwhile, has said hardly anything. In public, they aren't afraid to besmirch each other for political points, as opposing leaders typically do. ...

... But one stark political truth has bound them together: No Speaker has ever needed a Minority Leader more than Johnson needs Jeffries.

... The passage of that aid package set into motion the most dramatic way Jeffries will help Johnson: by saving his job.

... Johnson seems to have tacitly accepted the painful political truth that he cannot advance any meaningful legislation with his fractured conference alone. That's a fact Jeffries has embraced, stepping in to save the day when, of course, there's something in it for the blue team. ...
-------|

No one, except Gaetz-MTG-Boebert++, needs more chaos in Congress at this point - if there's any emergency bill that needs passing, the only way it can be done is with two leaders assuring majority of votes and ability to bring the bill to vote. Hence, synergy - when and where it can be accomplished.
__________

#46 | Posted by CutiePie at 2024-05-10 08:41 PM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2024 World Readable

Drudge Retort