Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Sunday, March 09, 2025

It is not hyperbole to say that the future of American constitutional democracy now rests on a single question: Will President Trump and his administration defy court orders?

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

Today in Rhode Island, a federal judge told Trump to stop impounding funds allocated by Congress. It's about more than just the money; it's about making sure the president doesn't make a grab for powers that belong to Congress under the Constitution. joycevance.substack.com/p/courts-to- ...

[image or embed]

-- Joyce White Vance (@joycewhitevance.bsky.social) March 7, 2025 at 11:04 AM

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Coup Coup ca choo!

It's not a Coup if the King does it.

#1 | Posted by Corky at 2025-03-09 03:55 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 3

If Trump defies the Courts then he is an outlaw and who is owed nothing and should be treated accordingly.

#2 | Posted by Zed at 2025-03-09 03:58 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 3

It's about political zombie judges left over from previous administration interfering with the executive.

sedition
/s'diSH'n/
noun
noun: sedition; plural noun: seditions

conduct or speech inciting people to rebel against the authority of a state

used in a sentence:
Leftist bloggers and politicians are engaging in sedition

#3 | Posted by itchypossum at 2025-03-09 04:00 PM | Reply | Funny: 4

LOL

#4 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-03-09 04:01 PM | Reply

What's the penalty for my "sedition" sweetheart?

#5 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-03-09 04:02 PM | Reply

It's about political zombie judges left over from previous administration interfering with the executive.

sedition
/s'diSH'n/
noun
noun: sedition; plural noun: seditions

conduct or speech inciting people to rebel against the authority of a state

used in a sentence:
Leftist bloggers and politicians are engaging in sedition

Posted by itchypossum at 2025-03-09 04:00 PM | Reply

Is there anything that you right wingers won't lie about??

#6 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-03-09 04:08 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Is there anything that you right wingers won't lie about??

#6 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-03-09 04:08 PM | Reply | Flag:

I'm going with "no."

#7 | Posted by cbob at 2025-03-09 04:10 PM | Reply

Impounding slush funds is a great idea, investigating the slush funds for fraud and insider benefit is a better idea, and prosecuting the grifters is the best idea.

The abuse here is congress establishing permanent embezzlement networks. If a congressman or anyone in their orbit benefits personally from any legislation, it's corruption, even if the criminals try to excuse themselves.

#8 | Posted by itchypossum at 2025-03-09 04:11 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

way to dodge the question!

----------- talking point machine.

#9 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-03-09 04:13 PM | Reply

Advocating overthrow of Government. Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.

#10 | Posted by itchypossum at 2025-03-09 04:14 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

Advocating overthrow of Government.

#10 | Posted by itchypossum

Tell you what, Sweetness.

I won't overthrow the government if Trump won't.

#11 | Posted by Zed at 2025-03-09 04:21 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 4

- Advocating overthrow of Government

Trump's own appointed leaders of his DOJ all threatened to resign if he continued to order them to sign a Letter to the States telling them they could use Fake Electors; that they could change the winner's name on State Ballots from Biden to Trump... so he could overthrow the elected Government.

Now, of course, he's made sure his DOJ leaders are more loyal to him than to America.

And that's all just fine, just business as usual for Trumpers.

#12 | Posted by Corky at 2025-03-09 04:45 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Advocating overthrow of Government. Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.

#10 | Posted by itchypossum at 2025-03-09 04:14 PM | Reply

Apparently you're unfamiliar with the first amendment.

Also, who's gonna enforce that? Who's gonna jail left wing bloggers for typing that Trump is a criminal rapist POS? You, Mr. Armchair Warrior? LOL

#13 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-03-09 04:57 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Don't tell me that ItchyP ran away from his comments... again.

#14 | Posted by Corky at 2025-03-09 06:08 PM | Reply

...authority of a state...
#3 | Posted by itchypossum

L'tat, c'est moi...
King Dotard XIV

#15 | Posted by TFDNihilist at 2025-03-09 06:52 PM | Reply

It's about political zombie judges left over from previous administration interfering with the executive.

Another troll farm piece of s^*%?

#16 | Posted by jpw at 2025-03-10 02:02 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Advocating overthrow of Government. Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.
#10 | POSTED BY ITCHYPOSSUM

Try and keep up. There are new Rulz bro.

1st. Good luck getting a conviction on sedition.

2nd. And so what if you do. Once the government is "overthrown" you then get a pardon AND a job in the new administration.

#17 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-03-10 12:50 PM | Reply

Another troll farm piece of s^*%?

#16 | Posted by jpw at 2025-03-10 02:02 AM | Reply | Flag:

STFU SaltyDog. No one yanked on your stall door..

#18 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2025-03-10 07:25 PM | Reply

"conduct or speech inciting people to rebel against the authority of a state"

Seeing as Jan 6 wasn't sedition, nothing is sedition.

#19 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-03-11 09:11 AM | Reply

You mean like when you biden ignored the US Supreme Court ruling and continued to 'waive' student loans???

#20 | Posted by MSgt at 2025-03-11 12:53 PM | Reply

#20

More rwing myths...

"However, these new plans do not ignore the ruling by the Supreme Court as they are narrower in scope."

www.newsweek.com

#21 | Posted by Corky at 2025-03-11 01:05 PM | Reply

Biden defied SCOTUS over student debt forgiveness. And lefties cheered.

#22 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-03-11 01:47 PM | Reply

No he didn't you lying piece of sgit

#23 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-03-11 01:59 PM | Reply

Here is what happened

Biden did broad student loan forgiveness
SCOTUS went way beyond their authority to stop that perfectly legal program
Biden then forgave loans on a targeted wis compliance with several laws

Jeff is a disgusting disgraceful vile piece of ---- liar

You have been informed and educated.

Be a better person

Truth Hurts

#24 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-03-11 02:03 PM | Reply

Targeted basis in compliance

#25 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-03-11 02:04 PM | Reply

Biden defied SCOTUS over student debt forgiveness. And lefties cheered.
#22 | Posted by BellRinger

This statement is not accurate based on the available information. The Supreme Court struck down President Biden's initial student loan forgiveness program in June 2023[1]. Since then, the Biden administration has attempted to implement alternative student loan relief measures, but these have also faced legal challenges and Supreme Court intervention[2][6].

In August 2024, the Supreme Court refused to revive Biden's latest student loan debt relief plan, known as the Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE) initiative[2]. This decision indicates that the Biden administration has been working within the legal framework and respecting the Supreme Court's rulings, rather than defying them.

The Biden administration has continued to seek ways to provide student loan relief through various programs and initiatives, including income-based repayment plans and targeted loan forgiveness for specific groups of borrowers[3]. However, these efforts have been pursued through legal channels and administrative processes, not by defying Supreme Court decisions.

It's important to note that the administration's attempts to provide student loan relief have faced ongoing legal challenges and scrutiny from Republican-led states and conservative groups[2][6]. While some supporters of student loan forgiveness may have expressed disappointment with the Supreme Court's decisions, there is no evidence of widespread "cheering" for defying the Court's rulings.

Citations:
[1]
www.scotusblog.com
[2] www.nbcnews.com
[3] www.nasfaa.org
[4] time.com
[5] www.forbes.com
[6] www.bbc.com
[7] www.linkedin.com
[8] jaredgolden.substack.com
[9] democrats.org
[10] www.pbs.org
[11] www.usatoday.com
[12] studentaid.gov

#26 | Posted by rstybeach11 at 2025-03-11 03:23 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

Yes he did. Twoothy. Do you need me to link the case for your ignorant, Constitution hating ass?

#27 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-03-11 04:33 PM | Reply

Yes he did. Twoothy. Do you need me to link the case for your ignorant, Constitution hating ass?

Posted by BellRinger at 2025-03-11 04:33 PM | Reply

Just STFU Jeff. You forfeited the right to complain about Constitutional violations when you not only supported but voted for Trump after he participated in an insurrection to overthrow the Constitution and the rule of law. Just sayin

#28 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-03-11 04:43 PM | Reply

Piss off, Laura Mohr.

#29 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-03-11 04:51 PM | Reply

Piss off, Laura Mohr.

Posted by BellRinger at 2025-03-11 04:51 PM | Reply

No I won't because what I said was gospel truth.

#30 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-03-11 04:54 PM | Reply

- what I said was gospel truth.

Yeppers.... and the reason I have that poster killfiled; I don't truck with traitors or those who obfuscate for them.

#31 | Posted by Corky at 2025-03-11 05:01 PM | Reply

---- u ---- u won't post a legitimate link cause u can't cause ur a ------ liar

#32 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-03-11 05:03 PM | Reply

- what I said was gospel truth.

lol. Hey maga maroon. Learn to read.

Biden did not "defy" the Supreme Court.

After the Supreme Court ruling, the Biden administration did NOT carry forward with the program, but did try to relieve student loan debt in several other ways.

One way was blocked by the courts. (Which he did NOT defy)

And the other way was not blocked so no defiance there either.

Good luck trying to rewrite history you lying POS snake.

#33 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-03-11 05:23 PM | Reply

Nice gaslighting, Donnerboy.

Go screw yourself, Twoothy. You are a lying POS and an absolute scumbag on top.

#34 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-03-11 05:34 PM | Reply

BullBringer took his head out of Peter Thiel's dung hole long enough to post some angry nonsense?

Hey BullBringer, you should write a book about your transformation into a fascist.

It's been remarkable to witness Americans turn against their nation and embrace fascism.

#35 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-03-11 05:41 PM | Reply

It was all the BBQ'ed kielbasa.

The Painless Pole was a good guy, at least, for a Republican. The traitor supporting version not so much. If they are even related, which I tend to doubt now.

#36 | Posted by Corky at 2025-03-11 06:19 PM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort