The nonprofit says it was created by Congress in 1984 as an "independent nonprofit corporation," and it does not meet U.S. Code definitions of "government corporation," "government-controlled corporation" or "independent establishment."

But gets it's funding directly from Congress...

Doesn't anything that gets funding get its funding from Congress?

#9 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-03-18 02:06 PM | Reply | Flag:

Your heroin dealer doesn't.

So if they get funding from Congress then why is the Presidents "plumbers " and hatchet men breaking and entering into a private building? It's none of his business.

Arrest them.

#11 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-03-18 02:07 PM | Reply | Flag:

If you read the article, you would know they didn't break in.

"Chief of security Colin O'Brien said police on Monday helped DOGE members enter the building and that the private security team for the organization had its contract canceled."

13. That's pretty weak.

The contest will eventually be, Who will be the last Trumper to admit they were wrong?

Like the Japanese pilot who lived in a cave for 30 years.

#20 | Posted by Dbt2 at 2025-03-18 03:38 PM | Reply | Flag

And anyone who supported Biden/Harris has already bottomed out, but refuse to admit it. Want to look in the mirror, go ahead. But remember this, we got Trump because of the --------- of the ------ candidates offered by the DNC. There's literally nothing Trump can do at this point that would make me regret not voting for Kamala Harris.

Didn't you say your wife died of brain cancer? Has nothing to do with my response above - just wondering if I read that right.

That sounds illegal. Which police? There's over fifty active police forces in the District of Columbia.

#16 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-03-18 02:26 PM | Reply | Flag:

Sounds illegal? Since when does what Snoofy deems as "sounds illegal" mean anything? THey didn't break in, they got the police to assist them in entering. And wouldn't you know, their own security team had their contract canceled.

I know this is hard for you, but at least come up with a plausible argument.

I don't get it

#36 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-03-18 08:09 PM | Reply | Flag:

You never have/do, we've come to expect nothing more from you.

Okay? Is that okay?

#39 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-03-18 08:34 PM | Reply | Flag:

You should call DC and explain it. I'm sure Trump and Musk are waiting by the phone for you to call them and explain the violation.

No, you didn't, but I certainly appreciate your concern. I've mentioned she has other neurological issues.

#44 | Posted by Dbt2 at 2025-03-18 09:03 PM | Reply | Flag:

Nice recover on that fumble.

Actually I was trying to get an answer from you, but I guess it's above your pay grade.

#43 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-03-18 08:39 PM | Reply | Flag:

It's definitely above my pay grade to decide the legalities of rogue organization that does not meet U.S. Code definitions of "government corporation," "government-controlled corporation" or "independent establishment." - yet, said organization is still on the grift from congressional money.

But go ahead Snoofy, impress us with your nonsense, we're all waiting.