Advertisement
Sonia Sotomayor Puts It Clearly: None of Our Rights Are Safe
Shirin Ali: The high court has opened Pandora's box.
Menu
Front Page Breaking News Comments Flagged Comments Recently Flagged User Blogs Write a Blog Entry Create a Poll Edit Account Weekly Digest Stats Page RSS Feed Back Page
Subscriptions
Read the Retort using RSS.
RSS Feed
Author Info
retort
Joined 2003/04/04Visited 2003/04/04
Status: user
MORE STORIES
Elon Musk Threatens War Against the Entire GOP (15 comments) ...
Senate Republicans Narrowly Pass Trump Megabill (33 comments) ...
Who Wins and Who Loses in Republicans' 'big, beautiful bill' (20 comments) ...
Senate Republicans Wound Filibuster to Pass Debt Bomb (5 comments) ...
Supreme Court Will Hear Challenge to Limits on Political Party Spending (1 comments) ...
Alternate links: Google News | Twitter
But Justice Sotomayor explains lays plain the dangerous consequences of this decision.[image or embed] -- Sen. Cory Booker (@booker.senate.gov) Jun 27, 2025 at 1:24 PM
But Justice Sotomayor explains lays plain the dangerous consequences of this decision.[image or embed]
Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
Where's Boaz to tell us G-d is where our rights come from?
#1 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-06-28 02:40 PM | Reply
The People's Rights come from the Constitution.... unfortunately, Republicans gave Corporations Personhood; making them Super Citizens with rights and privileges and advantages far beyond the average Citizen.
Now they've installed the classic definition of a Fascist government in America, mostly by charming a disgruntled electorate with the idea that Facts are what the Party says they are, not what a rational objective analysis would reveal.
So, obvious facts like that the 2020 Election was ALMOST rigged by Trump, it was never rigged against him.
Or the fact that immigrants are not the raging criminal threat that Republicans told you they are; the fact is that, per capita, immigrants on average commit far fewer crimes than do US Citizens.
In Trumpland, he's a victim, and so are they. Because they are in a cult.
#2 | Posted by Corky at 2025-06-28 04:11 PM | Reply
Trump, Hitler, and Stalin walk into a bar...
www.youtube.com
1.5 mins
#3 | Posted by Corky at 2025-06-28 04:36 PM | Reply
The next Dem President should declare the 2A extinct by Executive Order.
Just like you like it, eh TrumpHumpers?
#4 | Posted by zarnon at 2025-06-28 05:54 PM | Reply
She's a hack.
#5 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-06-28 06:00 PM | Reply
She's right you know.
#6 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-06-28 06:01 PM | Reply
#5 | Posted by BellRinger
You're a fascist.
Hacks don't hurt anyone.
#7 | Posted by Zed at 2025-06-28 06:08 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1
#5 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER AT 2025-06-28 06:00 PM | FLAG: Of course, as she wants to give rulings in accordance with liberal agendas, instead of her actual job as to whether or not a ruling is constitutional.
#8 | Posted by MSgt at 2025-06-28 06:14 PM | Reply
Jeff the internet troll calls one of the most brilliant jurists in decades, a hack.
one of the dumbest posters on the DR agrees with him
Just another day of idiots lowering our nation's IQ
#9 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-06-28 06:22 PM | Reply
#5 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER
No, gutes deutsch, you're just an ignorant fool.
#10 | Posted by jpw at 2025-06-28 08:15 PM | Reply
Brilliant? She doesn't even know what a woman is.
#11 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-06-28 09:47 PM | Reply
She's a DEI hire.
#12 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-06-28 09:59 PM | Reply
Posted by BellRinger at 2025-06-28 09:59 PM | Reply GFY JEFF
#13 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-06-28 10:00 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1
She doesn't even know what a woman is.
Do you have any evidence to support that claim?
#14 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-06-28 10:01 PM | Reply
This is what lefties define as "brilliance":
x.com
#15 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-06-28 10:02 PM | Reply
" Do you have any evidence to support that claim?
#14 | POSTED BY REDIAL AT 2025-06-28 10:01 PM | FLAG: "
During her confirmation hearings she was asked if she can define what a woman is and her response was, "I'm not a biologist"
#16 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-06-28 10:03 PM | Reply
Laura Mohr:
" WASHINGTON, Jan 27 (Reuters) - President Joe Biden on Thursday said he plans by the end of February to nominate a Black woman to replace retiring U.S. Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer, a historic first that he called "long overdue."
www.reuters.com
That's why she gets called a DEI hire. Thank Biden for that.
#17 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-06-28 10:07 PM | Reply
Posted by BellRinger at 2025-06-28 10:03 PM | Reply
You're thinking about Justice Jackson. Not Sotomayor.
#18 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-06-28 10:07 PM | Reply
He's just using the knee-jerk flowchart today.
#19 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-06-28 10:09 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1
WASHINGTON, Jan 27 (Reuters) - President Joe Biden on Thursday said he plans by the end of February to nominate a Black woman to replace retiring U.S. Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer, a historic first that he called "long overdue." www.reuters.com
Posted by BellRinger at 2025-06-28 10:07 PM | Reply
No different than Amy Barrett being a DEI hire. If you want to go that route.
#20 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-06-28 10:12 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1
BullBringer is threatened by women who have achieved more with their lives than he ever will.
That's why all the women in the Republican Party look like domestic abuse victims.
They've been taught their place.
#21 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-06-28 10:18 PM | Reply
Yes, I did mix up the two. Apologies for that.
#22 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-06-28 10:26 PM | Reply
Not a Federalist Society hack? Then you're a "DEI Hire"
#23 | Posted by hamburglar at 2025-06-29 08:50 AM | Reply
I'm a borderline Hall of Fame troll, Alexandrite. I easily elicit multiple responses with a single post. And it doesn't take any effort. #27 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-04-06 05:42 PM
#24 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-06-29 10:18 AM | Reply
Sotomayor looks like the housekeeping cleaner that stole my laptop and phone. This was 2008 or so, what did she do before Obama appointed her?
#25 | Posted by visitor_ at 2025-06-29 11:34 AM | Reply
Yes, none of what -------- consider rights, but aren't actual rights, are safe.
#26 | Posted by THEBULL at 2025-06-30 10:02 AM | Reply
In other words, all of them.
#27 | Posted by zarnon at 2025-06-30 10:34 AM | Reply
I wonder if liberals are OK with Sotomayor being sued for plagiarism since Reps already said THIS EXACT SAME THING when Biden was POTUS. And it's either said or alluded to by Dems during Trump's first term, W's terms in office, and the first Bush. And Reps said it during Obama and Clinton. I'm sure it goes even farther back but I can't specifically remember. But I remember clearly that both sides have been saying this since the first Bush.
But hey, let's not let facts get in the way of our partisan hypocrisy, amirite?
#28 | Posted by humtake at 2025-06-30 11:39 AM | Reply
"I wonder if liberals are OK with Sotomayor being sued for plagiarism since Reps already said THIS EXACT SAME THING when Biden was POTUS."
Well, women did in fact lose their reproductive rights under Trump.
#29 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-06-30 11:42 AM | Reply
Out rights to behave like rightwing gestapo are perfectly safe. ICE is hiring thugs, with high wages and great benefits.
#30 | Posted by moder8 at 2025-06-30 02:14 PM | Reply
Post a commentComments are closed for this entry.Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy
Comments are closed for this entry.
Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy