DOJ to Begin Turning over Epstein Docs to Congress Friday

Tuesday, August 19, 2025

The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee announced Monday it expects to begin receiving files related to Jeffrey Epstein from the Department of Justice (DOJ) by the end of the week.

Posted by lamplighter at 08:31 PM | 23 COMMENTS | permalink | Comment on This Entry |

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

Breaking news: The Justice Department will begin sharing records related to deceased sex offender Jeffrey Epstein on Friday, the House Oversight Committee chairman said in a statement.

[image or embed]
-- The Washington Post (@washingtonpost.com) Aug 18, 2025 at 3:52 PM

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

More from the article...

... "Officials with the Department of Justice have informed us that the Department will begin to provide Epstein-related records to the Oversight Committee this week on Friday. There are many records in DOJ's custody, and it will take the Department time to produce all the records and ensure the identification of victims and any child sexual abuse material are redacted," Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) said in a statement.

"I appreciate the Trump Administration's commitment to transparency and efforts to provide the American people with information about this matter."

The plans spurred pushback from the panel's Democrats, who said the DOJ was failing to fully comply by not meeting the original deadline and supplying all documents. ...

#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-08-18 06:35 PM | Reply

I just wonder if there will be more words than marked out words... words like, "Donald" and "Trump"?

Also, will it highlight that Trump's Best Friend and Mega Wingman is estimated to have had at least 1,000 trysts with underage girls...

... brought to him by the woman that Trump, "wished the best" to, and moved to Club Fed after she spent hours with his personal lawyer and DOJ lawyer, who are the same guy.

#2 | Posted by Corky at 2025-08-18 06:42 PM | Reply

The Epstein files once publicly released will simply be a font of information: media.wired.com

#3 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-08-18 06:47 PM | Reply

I'll believe it when I see it.

#4 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-08-18 10:52 PM | Reply

Yeah right. I don't believe a word of it.

#5 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-08-18 10:52 PM | Reply

Trump's name has reportedly already been scrubbed of the damn thing.

#6 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-08-18 11:14 PM | Reply

Alexandrite,

Where have you seen that? It's a believable classic m but I do sometimes like to independently verify these things. I'm not asking for a link, a reference will suffice.

#7 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-08-18 11:16 PM | Reply

Classic m = claim

#8 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-08-18 11:16 PM | Reply

economictimes.indiatimes.com

#9 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-08-18 11:17 PM | Reply

FBI Redacts Donald Trump's Name from Jeffrey Epstein Files
According to three individuals familiar with the process who spoke to Bloomberg's Jason Leopold, internal instructions were given to around 1,000 FBI agents this past March to specifically flag any mention of Trump across more than 100,000 pages of Epstein-related records. Yet, when the documents were reviewed and prepped for public release, references to Trump were reportedly redacted by Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) officer as reported by newsweek.

And that's right wing newsweek.

#10 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-08-18 11:20 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

Nothing released by Lewzer is remotely viable. He just wants good news, so he will only allow good news.

#11 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-08-18 11:34 PM | Reply

Bondi said she had Epstein's "client list" on her desk.
She was reviewing the Epstein files, ready to go.
That was TWENTY-SIX WEEKS AGO.
In the meantime, she told Trump his name is in those files.
Since then ...

C
O
V
E
R
U
P

#12 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2025-08-19 06:12 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 4

#9 and 10. Thank you. I will check it out today.

#13 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-08-19 09:00 AM | Reply

No Problem.

#14 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-08-19 09:37 AM | Reply

#10

I doubt the veracity of that report.

If you can't give me two reasons to doubt it, then you're just promoting propaganda.

#15 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-08-19 10:03 AM | Reply

If you can't give me two reasons to doubt it..

Pro tip:

No one here cares even a tiny bit what a foreign agitator like you, taking advantage of our open society to attempt to spread agitprop in order to create chaos and division in that same society, "doubts".

But do carry on.

#16 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-08-19 10:11 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 4

I'll ~~believe~~ deny, deflect and defend as I always do it when I see it.

#4 | Posted by BellRinger

Fix that for you.

#17 | Posted by jpw at 2025-08-19 10:17 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

I doubt the veracity of that report.
If you can't give me two reasons to doubt it, then you're just promoting propaganda.

#15 | Posted by oneironaut

Of course, you do.

Meanwhile, you accept the veracity of everything that comes out of the Trump administration without pause or critical thought.

#18 | Posted by jpw at 2025-08-19 10:21 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

"Fix that for you.

#17 | Posted by jpw at 2025-08-19 10:17 AM"

You are such a cooze.

#19 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-08-20 11:45 PM | Reply

"Meanwhile, you accept the veracity of everything that comes out of the Trump administration without pause or critical thought.

#18 | Posted by jpw"

You've been swallowing more Dem propaganda and false leftwing-narratives than you have been swallowing milky white salty fluid at the truck stops, so you may want to sit this one out, Biker-bait.

#20 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-08-20 11:48 PM | Reply

Maybe it'll answer why Trump is protecting Bill Clinton.

#21 | Posted by lee_the_agent at 2025-08-21 01:28 PM | Reply

just promoting propaganda.

On this site? Chuthulu forbid!

#22 | Posted by lee_the_agent at 2025-08-21 01:30 PM | Reply

Maybe it'll answer why Trump is protecting Bill Clinton.

Posted by lee_the_agent at 2025-08-21 01:28 PM | Reply

They are two peas in a pod. Like duhhhhh.

#23 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-08-21 01:36 PM | Reply