"By the time she arrived, she said, the protesters had "stopped" a squadron of dozens of mostly masked Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents."

and

"Special agents and officers from ICE Homeland Security Investigations and the IRS, joined by federal partners, are executing 16 search warrants in southern Arizona related to immigration and tax violations," a Department of Homeland Security statement Friday morning."

So these protesters were impeding the execution of a legal process. Hmm, where have we heard that before...?

Stories like this really are not helping to fight fascism. You can't have it both ways.

#11- FLAG: FacePalm!

You're basically defining "fascism" as the implementation of any law you disagree with or deem to be "unfair", and therefore it's okay for protesters to "stop" the legal implementation of it. You're in J6 territory now.

The protesters think they're fighting fascism. I agree that a lot of things Trump does are similar to fascism. However, the specific action these protesters were "stopping"/impeding was not an example of fascism. It's legitimate for people to express forms of speech to protest government actions they disagree with, but once they start doing things to physically "stop" or impede them then it's crossed the line beyond constitutionally protected speech or expression. Do you disagree?

I'll get back to your deflection after you answer my question, which was actually directly related to the topic of this thread?