Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Thursday, March 05, 2026

For decades, scientists have mapped attention, memory, language, and reasoning to separate brain networks -- yet one big mystery remained: why does the mind feel like a single, unified system?

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Emergence can be a conscious phenomenon.

#1 | Posted by Dbt2 at 2026-03-04 05:17 AM | Reply

"I think, therefore I am"

- Rene Descartes

#2 | Posted by shane at 2026-03-04 09:59 AM | Reply

"I yam what I yam"

- Popeye

#3 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-03-04 11:47 AM | Reply

www.google.com

#4 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-04 11:49 AM | Reply

www.instagram.com

just a thought

#5 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-04 11:54 AM | Reply

Excerpt from "Thinking Allowed" with host Jeffery Mishlove talking with his guest Dr. Amit Goswami Professor of Physics from the University of Oregon, who claims that consciousness is primary

youtu.be

#6 | Posted by shane at 2026-03-04 02:30 PM | Reply

How To Get Amazing Deep Sleep |

www.youtube.com

The Eyes Trick

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/-56rXGTWukI

yt shorts Neuroscientist Andrew Huberman

#7 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-04 03:35 PM | Reply

www.youtube.com

#8 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-04 03:35 PM | Reply

btw... the first link above says 'sleep', but it's also for diet and weight loss; a couple of years ago I lost 50 lbs in about 7 mos to get under 200 (I'm 6'3")
just by drinking coffee and eating dark choc until 2 oclock, the eating whatever over the next 4 hours... and I'm still under 200.

And the link in 8 is a quick eye exercise that werks for 75 percent of people... your brain uses a lot of neurons every day to position and balance the body... which isn't helpful when you are trying to go to sleep.

The eye trick tells those neurons to shut down.

#9 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-04 04:04 PM | Reply

Okay Dokey then.

Now.

Define "consciousness" and where it exists.

#10 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-03-05 04:54 PM | Reply

ai.hubermanlab.com

no simple answers apparently

#11 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-05 05:28 PM | Reply

ok... #11 is way too long

Here's a short, intelligent discussion about the mind-body conundrum of consciousness that takes us to quantum field theory where there might be an answer... by a couple of MIT guys.

www.youtube.com

#12 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-05 06:14 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Apparently getting the problem over to QM is fundamental step to understanding:

www.youtube.com

"During his long career, he has collaborated with Stephen Hawking to uncover the secrets of the big bang, developed a quantum theory of consciousness with anaesthesiologist Stuart Hameroff and won the Nobel prize in physics for his prediction of regions where the gravitational field would be so intense that space-time itself would break down, the so-called singularity at the heart of a black hole."

#13 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-05 06:46 PM | Reply

... why does the mind feel like a single, unified system? ...

There is the mind, and there is the body the mind resides in.

To equate the two is not a correct assessment, imo.

Stephen Hawkings' body was paralyzed, but did that stop his mind from moving forward?


My view is that the body is the container that we are given to contain the consciousness we are also given.

So, then, that seems to beg the question... what happens to that consciousness when the body dies?


No one really seems to know.




#14 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-03-05 07:53 PM | Reply

Why you don't really exist | Sam Harris, Roger Penrose, Sophie Scott

The Institute of Art and Ideas

www.youtube.com

#15 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-05 10:06 PM | Reply

"Donald Hoffman: Nothing Exists Until It is Perceived

Cognitive neuroscientist Donald Hoffman shares a mind-bending insight: reality as we know it may just be a data structure inside consciousness " not the other way around.

This radically different perspective could transform how we understand ourselves, the universe, and the very nature of existence."

www.youtube.com

1 min yt short

full interview

www.youtube.com

#16 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-05 10:13 PM | Reply

OpEd: Is the Whole Universe Just a Simulation? (February 2026)
research.gatech.edu

... How do you know anything is real? Some things you can see directly, like your fingers. Other things, like your chin, you need a mirror or a camera to see. Other things can't be seen, but you believe in them because a parent or a teacher told you, or you read it in a book.

As a physicist, I use sensitive scientific instruments and complicated math to try to figure out what's real and what's not. But none of these sources of information is entirely reliable: Scientific measurements can be wrong, my calculations can have errors, even your eyes can deceive you, like the dress that broke the internet because nobody could agree on what colors it was.

Because every source of information " even your teachers " can trick you some of the time, some people have always wondered whether we can ever trust any information.

If you can't trust anything, are you sure you're awake?

Thousands of years ago, Chinese philosopher Zhuangzi dreamed he was a butterfly and realized that he might actually be a butterfly dreaming he was a human.

Plato wondered whether all we see could just be shadows of true objects.

Maybe the world we live in our whole lives inside isn't the real one, maybe it's more like a big video game, or the movie "The Matrix." ...



#17 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-03-05 10:33 PM | Reply

Physics: the universe as a hologram

www.scientificamerican.com

#18 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-05 10:45 PM | Reply

@#18

Yeah, there is so much we do not know and we cannot explain.

And, don't even get me started on the concept of a multi-verse ...

#19 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-03-05 11:06 PM | Reply

Consciousness is a Goedelian truth - it has no proof. It's like concepts such as existence, nonexistence, or unity in quantum mechanics. Because of this we say that the universe cannot be explained by algorithmic laws and therefore cannot be a simulation.

Reason also seems to be emergent - machines do it now, simply by having a large enough interconnected language database.Reason seems to emerge from symbolic language. And reason is proof through language, and therefore non-Goedelian.

Consciousness and reason are therefore not the same.

#20 | Posted by HeliumRat at 2026-03-06 01:59 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#20

Yep, and that's Penrose again.

also:

the universe not a simulation... using Godel

www.sciencedaily.com

#21 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-06 11:01 AM | Reply

AI Overview on Pierre Teilhard de Chardin:

[FYI: Teilhard was a Jesuit whose work was considered so dangerous to the Catholic Church that its publication was banned until after his death.]

Pierre Teilhard de Chardin's noosphere is the "sphere of human thought," a planetary layer of consciousness and interconnected mind that emerged from the biosphere. As a Jesuit priest and paleontologist, he proposed that evolution moves toward increasing complexity and consciousness, ultimately converging towards a final, divine unity called the "Omega Point."

Key Aspects of the Noosphere

Definition: Coined from the Greek noos ("mind") and sphaira ("sphere"), it represents the collective mental activity, knowledge, and social networks of humanity.

Evolutionary Stage: It is the third stage of planetary development, succeeding the physiosphere (non-living matter) and the biosphere (living organisms).

The "Reflection" Principle: Humans are distinguished by their ability to not only know, but to "know that they know" (reflection), allowing for conscious evolution.

Convergence: The noosphere is not just a collection of minds, but a strengthening, interconnected "superorganism" that brings humanity together, according to Wikipedia and the University of Manchester.

The Omega Point: Teilhard believed this tightening network of consciousness is moving toward a future, ultimate synthesis, which he defined as the Omega Point"a point of maximum complexity, consciousness, and love.

Teilhard's theory, often explored in his work The Phenomenon of Man, integrates scientific understanding of evolution with a spiritual, teleological view of the universe, as shown in www.youtube.com and on the Information Philosopher website.

#22 | Posted by Dbt2 at 2026-03-06 11:12 AM | Reply

Not only is consciousness and reason emergent properties.

Life itself is an emergent property of the universe.

It appears that all of these emergent properties are inevitable given the nature and size of the universe and the nature of Time and Matter.

We will be able to prove this theory of the origin of life the second we find life outside the Earth that has emerged naturally from its environment.

And I suspect we will find life on (or in) the moons of Saturn or Jupiter. Or both. And suspect it will be similar to our own form of Life. (Life is also something we don't have a good definition of)

Jupiter's moon Europa and Saturn's moon Enceladus are top candidates for extraterrestrial life, as both possess subsurface liquid water oceans, organic molecules, and potential hydrothermal energy sources. These organic compounds are also emergent properties of matter itself. These icy moons could support microbial life within their oceans, with plumes on Enceladus confirming the presence of necessary ingredients.

Personally I can't wait to find out. Hope we do in my lifetime.

#23 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-03-06 11:26 AM | Reply

"Life itself is an emergent property of the universe."

I've been saying this for quite some time now.

#24 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-03-06 11:27 AM | Reply

www.timesensitive.fm

scroll down a bit for the highlight in pink

#25 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-06 11:44 AM | Reply

Then there's:

www.youtube.com

less than a min

#26 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-06 11:49 AM | Reply

Consciousness existed before life | Stuart Hameroff argues that consciousness predates life, originating in the quantum states of microtubules within cells.

Stuart Hameroff is an American anesthesiologist and professor at the University of Arizona known for his studies of consciousness and his controversial claim, alongside Sir Roger Penrose, that consciousness originates from quantum states in neural microtubules.
(see #12 for the apparent importance of quantum fields to understanding consciousness)

www.youtube.com

time stamped and not very long

#27 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-06 12:10 PM | Reply

"A quantum microtubule substrate of consciousness is experimentally supported and solves the binding and epiphenomenalism problems Open Access
Michael C Wiest Author Notes

Neuroscience of Consciousness, Volume 2025, Issue 1, 2025, niaf011, doi.org
Published: 06 May 2025

Recent experimental evidence, briefly reviewed here, points to intraneuronal microtubules as a functional target of inhalational anesthetics. This finding is consistent with the general hypothesis that the biophysical substrate of consciousness is a collective quantum state of microtubules and is specifically predicted by the Orchestrated Objective Reduction theory of Penrose and Hameroff.

I also review experimental evidence that functionally relevant quantum effects occur in microtubules at room temperature, and direct physical evidence of a macroscopic quantum entangled state in the living human brain that is correlated with the conscious state and working memory performance.

Having established the physical and biological plausibility of quantum microtubule states related to consciousness, I turn to consider potential practical advantages of a quantum brain and enormous theoretical advantages of a quantum consciousness model."

academic.oup.com

#28 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-06 12:31 PM | Reply

There are 2 kinds of reality...

www.youtube.com

1 min

#29 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-06 01:39 PM | Reply

The Quantum Brain in 90 Seconds

www.youtube.com

#30 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-06 01:45 PM | Reply

Was Penrose Right? NEW EVIDENCE For Quantum Effects In The Brain

PBS Space Time

www.youtube.com

#31 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-06 04:48 PM | Reply

I've been saying this for quite some time now.
#24 | POSTED BY SNOOFY

Then you have been right for quite some time now!

#32 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-03-06 08:39 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort