Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Thursday, March 05, 2026

For decades, scientists have mapped attention, memory, language, and reasoning to separate brain networks -- yet one big mystery remained: why does the mind feel like a single, unified system?

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Emergence can be a conscious phenomenon.

#1 | Posted by Dbt2 at 2026-03-04 05:17 AM | Reply

"I think, therefore I am"

- Rene Descartes

#2 | Posted by shane at 2026-03-04 09:59 AM | Reply

"I yam what I yam"

- Popeye

#3 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-03-04 11:47 AM | Reply

www.google.com

#4 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-04 11:49 AM | Reply

www.instagram.com

just a thought

#5 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-04 11:54 AM | Reply

Excerpt from "Thinking Allowed" with host Jeffery Mishlove talking with his guest Dr. Amit Goswami Professor of Physics from the University of Oregon, who claims that consciousness is primary

youtu.be

#6 | Posted by shane at 2026-03-04 02:30 PM | Reply

How To Get Amazing Deep Sleep |

www.youtube.com

The Eyes Trick

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/-56rXGTWukI

yt shorts Neuroscientist Andrew Huberman

#7 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-04 03:35 PM | Reply

www.youtube.com

#8 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-04 03:35 PM | Reply

btw... the first link above says 'sleep', but it's also for diet and weight loss; a couple of years ago I lost 50 lbs in about 7 mos to get under 200 (I'm 6'3")
just by drinking coffee and eating dark choc until 2 oclock, the eating whatever over the next 4 hours... and I'm still under 200.

And the link in 8 is a quick eye exercise that werks for 75 percent of people... your brain uses a lot of neurons every day to position and balance the body... which isn't helpful when you are trying to go to sleep.

The eye trick tells those neurons to shut down.

#9 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-04 04:04 PM | Reply

Okay Dokey then.

Now.

Define "consciousness" and where it exists.

#10 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-03-05 04:54 PM | Reply

ai.hubermanlab.com

no simple answers apparently

#11 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-05 05:28 PM | Reply

ok... #11 is way too long

Here's a short, intelligent discussion about the mind-body conundrum of consciousness that takes us to quantum field theory where there might be an answer... by a couple of MIT guys.

www.youtube.com

#12 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-05 06:14 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Apparently getting the problem over to QM is fundamental step to understanding:

www.youtube.com

"During his long career, he has collaborated with Stephen Hawking to uncover the secrets of the big bang, developed a quantum theory of consciousness with anaesthesiologist Stuart Hameroff and won the Nobel prize in physics for his prediction of regions where the gravitational field would be so intense that space-time itself would break down, the so-called singularity at the heart of a black hole."

#13 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-05 06:46 PM | Reply

... why does the mind feel like a single, unified system? ...

There is the mind, and there is the body the mind resides in.

To equate the two is not a correct assessment, imo.

Stephen Hawkings' body was paralyzed, but did that stop his mind from moving forward?


My view is that the body is the container that we are given to contain the consciousness we are also given.

So, then, that seems to beg the question... what happens to that consciousness when the body dies?


No one really seems to know.




#14 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-03-05 07:53 PM | Reply

Why you don't really exist | Sam Harris, Roger Penrose, Sophie Scott

The Institute of Art and Ideas

www.youtube.com

#15 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-05 10:06 PM | Reply

"Donald Hoffman: Nothing Exists Until It is Perceived

Cognitive neuroscientist Donald Hoffman shares a mind-bending insight: reality as we know it may just be a data structure inside consciousness " not the other way around.

This radically different perspective could transform how we understand ourselves, the universe, and the very nature of existence."

www.youtube.com

1 min yt short

full interview

www.youtube.com

#16 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-05 10:13 PM | Reply

OpEd: Is the Whole Universe Just a Simulation? (February 2026)
research.gatech.edu

... How do you know anything is real? Some things you can see directly, like your fingers. Other things, like your chin, you need a mirror or a camera to see. Other things can't be seen, but you believe in them because a parent or a teacher told you, or you read it in a book.

As a physicist, I use sensitive scientific instruments and complicated math to try to figure out what's real and what's not. But none of these sources of information is entirely reliable: Scientific measurements can be wrong, my calculations can have errors, even your eyes can deceive you, like the dress that broke the internet because nobody could agree on what colors it was.

Because every source of information " even your teachers " can trick you some of the time, some people have always wondered whether we can ever trust any information.

If you can't trust anything, are you sure you're awake?

Thousands of years ago, Chinese philosopher Zhuangzi dreamed he was a butterfly and realized that he might actually be a butterfly dreaming he was a human.

Plato wondered whether all we see could just be shadows of true objects.

Maybe the world we live in our whole lives inside isn't the real one, maybe it's more like a big video game, or the movie "The Matrix." ...



#17 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-03-05 10:33 PM | Reply

Physics: the universe as a hologram

www.scientificamerican.com

#18 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-05 10:45 PM | Reply

@#18

Yeah, there is so much we do not know and we cannot explain.

And, don't even get me started on the concept of a multi-verse ...

#19 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-03-05 11:06 PM | Reply

Consciousness is a Goedelian truth - it has no proof. It's like concepts such as existence, nonexistence, or unity in quantum mechanics. Because of this we say that the universe cannot be explained by algorithmic laws and therefore cannot be a simulation.

Reason also seems to be emergent - machines do it now, simply by having a large enough interconnected language database.Reason seems to emerge from symbolic language. And reason is proof through language, and therefore non-Goedelian.

Consciousness and reason are therefore not the same.

#20 | Posted by HeliumRat at 2026-03-06 01:59 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#20

Yep, and that's Penrose again.

also:

the universe not a simulation... using Godel

www.sciencedaily.com

#21 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-06 11:01 AM | Reply

AI Overview on Pierre Teilhard de Chardin:

[FYI: Teilhard was a Jesuit whose work was considered so dangerous to the Catholic Church that its publication was banned until after his death.]

Pierre Teilhard de Chardin's noosphere is the "sphere of human thought," a planetary layer of consciousness and interconnected mind that emerged from the biosphere. As a Jesuit priest and paleontologist, he proposed that evolution moves toward increasing complexity and consciousness, ultimately converging towards a final, divine unity called the "Omega Point."

Key Aspects of the Noosphere

Definition: Coined from the Greek noos ("mind") and sphaira ("sphere"), it represents the collective mental activity, knowledge, and social networks of humanity.

Evolutionary Stage: It is the third stage of planetary development, succeeding the physiosphere (non-living matter) and the biosphere (living organisms).

The "Reflection" Principle: Humans are distinguished by their ability to not only know, but to "know that they know" (reflection), allowing for conscious evolution.

Convergence: The noosphere is not just a collection of minds, but a strengthening, interconnected "superorganism" that brings humanity together, according to Wikipedia and the University of Manchester.

The Omega Point: Teilhard believed this tightening network of consciousness is moving toward a future, ultimate synthesis, which he defined as the Omega Point"a point of maximum complexity, consciousness, and love.

Teilhard's theory, often explored in his work The Phenomenon of Man, integrates scientific understanding of evolution with a spiritual, teleological view of the universe, as shown in www.youtube.com and on the Information Philosopher website.

#22 | Posted by Dbt2 at 2026-03-06 11:12 AM | Reply

Not only is consciousness and reason emergent properties.

Life itself is an emergent property of the universe.

It appears that all of these emergent properties are inevitable given the nature and size of the universe and the nature of Time and Matter.

We will be able to prove this theory of the origin of life the second we find life outside the Earth that has emerged naturally from its environment.

And I suspect we will find life on (or in) the moons of Saturn or Jupiter. Or both. And suspect it will be similar to our own form of Life. (Life is also something we don't have a good definition of)

Jupiter's moon Europa and Saturn's moon Enceladus are top candidates for extraterrestrial life, as both possess subsurface liquid water oceans, organic molecules, and potential hydrothermal energy sources. These organic compounds are also emergent properties of matter itself. These icy moons could support microbial life within their oceans, with plumes on Enceladus confirming the presence of necessary ingredients.

Personally I can't wait to find out. Hope we do in my lifetime.

#23 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-03-06 11:26 AM | Reply

"Life itself is an emergent property of the universe."

I've been saying this for quite some time now.

#24 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-03-06 11:27 AM | Reply

www.timesensitive.fm

scroll down a bit for the highlight in pink

#25 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-06 11:44 AM | Reply

Then there's:

www.youtube.com

less than a min

#26 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-06 11:49 AM | Reply

Consciousness existed before life | Stuart Hameroff argues that consciousness predates life, originating in the quantum states of microtubules within cells.

Stuart Hameroff is an American anesthesiologist and professor at the University of Arizona known for his studies of consciousness and his controversial claim, alongside Sir Roger Penrose, that consciousness originates from quantum states in neural microtubules.
(see #12 for the apparent importance of quantum fields to understanding consciousness)

www.youtube.com

time stamped and not very long

#27 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-06 12:10 PM | Reply

"A quantum microtubule substrate of consciousness is experimentally supported and solves the binding and epiphenomenalism problems Open Access
Michael C Wiest Author Notes

Neuroscience of Consciousness, Volume 2025, Issue 1, 2025, niaf011, doi.org
Published: 06 May 2025

Recent experimental evidence, briefly reviewed here, points to intraneuronal microtubules as a functional target of inhalational anesthetics. This finding is consistent with the general hypothesis that the biophysical substrate of consciousness is a collective quantum state of microtubules and is specifically predicted by the Orchestrated Objective Reduction theory of Penrose and Hameroff.

I also review experimental evidence that functionally relevant quantum effects occur in microtubules at room temperature, and direct physical evidence of a macroscopic quantum entangled state in the living human brain that is correlated with the conscious state and working memory performance.

Having established the physical and biological plausibility of quantum microtubule states related to consciousness, I turn to consider potential practical advantages of a quantum brain and enormous theoretical advantages of a quantum consciousness model."

academic.oup.com

#28 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-06 12:31 PM | Reply

There are 2 kinds of reality...

www.youtube.com

1 min

#29 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-06 01:39 PM | Reply

The Quantum Brain in 90 Seconds

www.youtube.com

#30 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-06 01:45 PM | Reply

Was Penrose Right? NEW EVIDENCE For Quantum Effects In The Brain

PBS Space Time

www.youtube.com

#31 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-06 04:48 PM | Reply

I've been saying this for quite some time now.
#24 | POSTED BY SNOOFY

Then you have been right for quite some time now!

#32 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-03-06 08:39 PM | Reply

"CPU inventor and physicist Federico Faggin, together with Prof. Giacomo Mauro D'Ariano, proposes that consciousness is not an emergent property of the brain, but a fundamental aspect of reality itself: quantum fields are conscious and have free will.

In this theory, our physical body is a quantum-classical machine,' operated by free will decisions of quantum fields.

Faggin calls the theory 'Quantum Information Panpsychism' (QIP) and claims that it can give us testable predictions in the near future.

If the theory is correct, it not only will be the most accurate theory of consciousness, it will also solve mysteries around the interpretation of quantum mechanics."

www.youtube.com

#33 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-06 10:39 PM | Reply

consciousness is not an emergent property of the brain

Because life is an emergent property of the universe. Brains are an emergent property of Life. Which makes consciousness an emergent property of the universe. But back to brains. It's pretty clear that consciousness requires a brain. So if it does not come from brains where does it come from? There are theories about the brain being a receiver of consciousness. And consciousness is everywhere but I am not buying it.

I recently took a short online course in geology. We have learned a lot about the evolution of matter from hydrogen into all of the elements. And how matter itself evolves and changes from one form to another. From hydrogen dust to massive stars creating and exploding elements into the void which gravity takes and then evolves into the various forms of matter like we see today on earth.

As matter evolves it creates the conditions for life. Especially in "Goldilock zones". And then once all the ingredients are in place Time does its thing.

I believe that in this universe under the right conditions Life is inevitable. Given enough Time. But the only way to prove that is to create it yourself in a lab or find it elsewhere in the universe.

We humans are working on both.

#34 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-03-07 10:11 AM | Reply

It would come from quantum fields, possibly located in microtubules, per the several posts above.

#35 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-07 11:18 AM | Reply

In #27, the evolutionist view of how that could happen is presented; which involves primordial soup somehow devoping feefees; pleasure and pain as motivators.

#26 gives another option.

#36 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-07 11:25 AM | Reply

developing

#37 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-07 11:25 AM | Reply

It would come from quantum fields, possibly located in microtubules, per the several posts above.

#35 | POSTED BY CORKY

Saw that. I understand that.

Those microtubes would have had to evolve /emege in brains to manifest itself eventually into what we call consciousness.

Fundamental Basis: Rather than a universe made of individual, distinct particles, QFT suggests a world of interconnected fields where particles are just manifestations.
Ubiquity: Fields exist at every point in space and time.

The point I am trying to make is that this universe is finely tuned for life. And because of that the fact that quantum field underlays everything the underlying quantum field does of course play a part in everything.

Also the point I was trying to make is that you have to have a brain to experience consciousness. But even plants are "conscious" you might say. But not a fully evolved consciousness.

This does not bode well for "Life After Death".

#38 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-03-07 11:59 AM | Reply

I watched a display while my wife's brain filled up with blood, and the doctor told me that she would not survive... she later told me she was following a dark tunnel towards a distant light, that opened to a marvelous, joyous place, where her deceased aunts and others welcomeed her.

She didn't want to leave, but they told her that she couldn't stay because she had something to do back here. (have our daughter, I think)

She, for all purposees, didn't have a functioning brain, but she was very conscious.

Of course, an untold number of people have had similar experiences.

But whatever the mechanisms, quantum fields or brain placisity of atoms... whenever I see a car go by, my first assumption is not that it is the result of billions of years of a mindless process.

Unless it's one of those really ugly Teslas.

#39 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-07 01:07 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

+
"Quantum fields are generally considered the fundamental, omnipresent, and continuous "fabric" of the universe, existing throughout all space and time.

While they are not eternal in the sense of having no beginning"as they likely originated with the Big Bang"they are persistent, underlying entities from which particles constantly emerge and vanish."

more
www.google.com

so apparently although they might exist in the microtubules in the brain, they continue to exist um, here, there, and everywhere, independent of the brain.

(mind you, Penrose and Stuart are anything but theists)

#40 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-07 01:34 PM | Reply

Re 39

People see things during near-death experiences (NDEs) primarily because the brain, when under extreme stress, oxygen deprivation (hypoxia), or chemical imbalance, produces vivid hallucinations and releases neurotransmitters.

These visions are influenced by cultural beliefs and personal memories, often causing feelings of peace and intense, life-altering, and highly realistic memories.

When I had my NDE all I saw was The Nothing. But I did not "see" The Nothing. How could you? What I "saw" was my memory of what The Nothing felt like.

It felt great btw. Looking forward to the peaceful rest. But not in any hurry as I know it's always there. Waiting for me to return to it. This is why I sometimes say. Nothing Matters. A lot!

But my experience and the memories of my experience were obviously influenced by my cultural/scientific beliefs.

We ARE the Universe. We are star dust. Which has finally evolved to the point where it can rise up and take a look at itself.

#41 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-03-07 02:19 PM | Reply

#41 | Posted by donnerboy

I read a interesting book on NDEs written by a Harvard neurosurgeon, previously an agnostic, who had one during a 7 day coma.

Proof of Heaven: A Neurosurgeon's Journey into the Afterlife

Thousands of people have had near-death experiences, but scientists have argued that they are impossible. Dr. Eben Alexander was one of those scientists. A highly trained neurosurgeon, Alexander knew that NDEs feel real, but are simply fantasies produced by brains under extreme stress.

Then, Dr. Alexander's own brain was attacked by a rare illness. The part of the brain that controls thought and emotions, and in essence makes us human, shut down completely. For seven days he lay in a coma. Then, as his doctors considered stopping treatment, Alexander's eyes popped open. He had come back.

#42 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2026-03-07 02:32 PM | Reply

Alexander's recovery is a medical miracle. But the real miracle of his story lies elsewhere. While his body lay in coma, Alexander journeyed beyond this world and encountered an angelic being who guided him into the deepest realms of super-physical existence. There he met, and spoke with, the Divine source of the universe itself.

Alexander's story is not a fantasy. Before he underwent his journey, he could not reconcile his knowledge of neuroscience with any belief in heaven, God, or the soul. Today Alexander is a doctor who believes that true health can be achieved only when we realize that God and the soul are real and that death is not the end of personal existence but only a transition.


I've often told my wife not to worry at my moment of death (should I precede her) that if I can't verbally express it, my thought will be "this is gonna be interesting!"

#43 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2026-03-07 02:52 PM | Reply

Re 42

You don't have to be brain dead or go into a coma to have that experience.

We have some really good drugs available now that will give you the exact same experience.

#44 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-03-07 03:09 PM | Reply

#39 | Posted by Corky

While adults can reference things they've read or heard about regarding NDEs, small children do not.

This is one of two books I've read about the experiences of small children who've had NDEs:

CLOSER TO THE LIGHT: Learning From the Near-Death Experiences of Children

This is what they have told Dr. Morse (a pediatrician):

"I have a wonderful secret to tell you. I have been climbing a staircase to heaven."
"I just wanted to get to that Light. Forget my body, forget everything. I just wanted to get to that Light."
"I was told that life is painful and that I had to go back anyway."
"There were a lot of good things in that Light."
"I heard a voice say, Go back, Bobby. You have a job to do.'"
"There as a beautiful Light that had everything good in it. For about a week, I could see sparkles of the Light in everything."
"Before falling asleep at night, I could see that Light."
"I learned that everything in life is connected and that if you hurt something, you hurt everything."
"I wasn't afraid to live again because I knew that someday I would be with that Light."
"You'll see. Heaven is fun."

Closer to the Light is a culmination of Dr. Morse's extensive research on children and the existence of the soul.

www.amazon.com

#45 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2026-03-07 03:18 PM | Reply

You don't have to be brain dead or go into a coma to have that experience.

We have some really good drugs available now that will give you the exact same experience.

#44 | Posted by donnerboy

Dr. Alexander is one of the most highly regarded neuroscientists/neurosurgeons in the country.

He explains in detail why there was no chemical or neurologically possible way his brain could have conjured up his experience.

#46 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2026-03-07 03:22 PM | Reply

One day we'll all find what, if anything, comes after our heart quits beating for final time ...

What sold me on the afterlife were the experiences of children who had NDEs, some as young as 4.

#47 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2026-03-07 03:25 PM | Reply

Re 45

Haven't read the book. Sounds interesting.

My first thought having reviewed it.

Dr Morris was raised Christian (Mormon). No wonder he rejected that nonsense.

I also see that highly regarded specialists in that field disagree with his conclusions and had alternate (physiological) explanations.

When those raised as (tainted by) Christianity speak of the soul they have a particular belief in mind.

Overview

According to the Bible, the soul (Hebrew: nephesh, Greek: psych") is the entire living person"body, mind, emotions, and will"formed when God breathes life into dust, making humans living beings, not just immortal spirits. It's the seat of desires and consciousness, connecting the physical to the spiritual, and while it can cease to exist (the "soul who sins shall die"), Christians believe faith in Christ offers hope for eternal life through resurrection, reuniting soul and body.

Sorry. Not still buying it. We have misinterpreted our place in the universe for a long long time. Sometimes on purpose. To control us.

But if we speak differently of the soul such as a force or form of energy I can understand and possibly accommodate that as a possible theory.

But reuniting our "spiritual energy" with our actual bodies? Sorry. Not buying it. I don't care if the Egyptians did believe it to be true for 3000 years or not. I can clearly see how that has worked out for them.

All the evidence we have accumulated so far indicates that this universe does not work that way.

When we die it will not be possible to hold our identity as we know it. There will be nothing to contain it. If anything our life force goes back to the "source". Which may just be the underlying quantum field which is the foundation of everything. Apparently.

And btw. Those kids did not "die". Or they would not have been able to share their experiences with the living. Oh. And btw. We still cannot even define what Life is. So good luck explaining what happens after it.

#48 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-03-07 03:56 PM | Reply

- We ARE the Universe. We are star dust. - Donner

We are stardust, we are golden
We are billion-year-old carbon
And we've got to get ourselves
Back to the Garden

We are stardust, we are golden
We are caught in the devil's bargain

Genesis 2:7, which says, "And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground". This concept is reinforced in Genesis 3:19, stating, "For you are dust, and to dust you shall return".

hmmm...

Genesis And Science: More Aligned Than You Think?

www.huffpost.com

;;

Quantum and the unknowable universe | Roger Penrose, Sabine Hossenfelder, Slavoj iek

The Institute of Art and Idea

www.youtube.com

short sample

www.youtube.com

#49 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-07 04:04 PM | Reply

- There will be nothing to contain it.

Unless it is contained as consciousness within a quantum field, which fields are all the rage in physics now, having provided solutions for other problems... particularly early on this bandwagon being Penrose, who did the maths and got the Nobel along with Hawking for the BBT.

#50 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-07 04:11 PM | Reply

Unless it is contained as consciousness within a quantum field ...

Are you proposing that the Quantum Field itself is conscious or has some place in it where our consciousness is contained intact?

If so you are entering the realm of the philosophical and not mainstream, proven science.

If we are being philosophical the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics suggests that consciousness might persist after death by shifting to parallel universes where a person (your consciousness or at least a part of it ) survives.

But even then. You won't the you that your current brain in this universe remembers.

#51 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-03-07 04:25 PM | Reply

Sir Roger Penrose: "The Big Bang was not a beginning of the Universe"

www.youtube.com

"going back to the remote future"

#52 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-07 04:27 PM | Reply

- Are you proposing that the Quantum Field itself is conscious or has some place in it where our consciousness is contained intact?

That's the premise of most of the above references; that consciousness resides in quantum fields (there are infinite numbers of those apparently) which reside in the brain in microtubules... which until recently were thought to be too 'wet' to contain them.

see the PBS link in #31

#53 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-07 04:33 PM | Reply

- by shifting to parallel universes

Hammeroff gives other options than that in #28.

#54 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-07 04:36 PM | Reply

As you can see I love this subject.

You may still exist. But you do then you will exist in a "different way". Awareness is not a soul. It's an awareness. Will we still be aware of anything? Will we remember anything? That is still to be determined.

The Illusion of Self: According to scholar and professor Jay Garfield, letting go of the "self" as a rigid, permanent, or central entity is a key, albeit challenging, step toward a more ethical and healthier life, (And death).

If you are still interested..

tricycle.org

Our best friends are those with which we disagree. They are not afraid to make us think and justify our thoughts.

#55 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-03-07 04:39 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort