Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Sunday, March 15, 2026

At least 10 women and girls say they were groomed at what was once Jeffrey Epstein's Zorro Ranch in New Mexico.

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

Epstein's Zorro Ranch was vast, remote and central to his abuse.

NBC News reviewed court testimony, lawsuits and records to understand how the ranch escaped scrutiny for years. www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news ... [image or embed]

-- Ben Goggin (@bengoggin.bsky.social) Mar 14, 2026 at 11:25 AM

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

>How Epstein Lured Girls

Oh! Oh! I know! [raises hand]

"Money!"

#1 | Posted by john_savage2 at 2026-03-15 12:36 PM | Reply

"The lost opportunities span the nearly two decades since Epstein was first caught paying underage girls for sex in Florida and cut a sweetheart deal that spared him serious prison time, according to a review of federal and state records, police reports and interviews with current and former officials. T

he 2008 agreement ended a federal investigation that found at least one allegation of abuse in New Mexico, where weak sex offender laws allowed Epstein to avoid registering with local authorities. The state didn't make human trafficking a crime until 2008, which left one less pathway to prosecution."

;;
hmmmm.... who gave Epstein a sweetheart deal?

"Alex Acosta, the former U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida who later served as Labor Secretary under President Trump, was the primary official responsible for the 2008 "sweetheart deal" given to Jeffrey Epstein.

This deal required Epstein to serve only 13 months in county jail, with work release privileges, and provided him with immunity from federal prosecution.

Immunity for Co-conspirators: The agreement famously extended immunity to unnamed "potential co-conspirators," which later hampered efforts to investigate those who aided Epstein.

Victims Not Consulted: A federal judge later ruled that this agreement violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act because Acosta's office did not inform or consult with the underage victims before cutting the deal."

more

www.google.com

"The 'completely unprecedented' plea deal Jeffrey Epstein made with Alex Acosta"

www.pbs.org

Trump paid him off by making him Sec of Labor.

#2 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-15 12:54 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

When is the orange chomo going to pardon Maxwell?

#3 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2026-03-15 12:59 PM | Reply

#4 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2026-03-15 01:16 PM | Reply

The state (NM) didn't make human trafficking a crime until 2008

Why is that?

Sounds crazy.

#5 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-03-15 01:18 PM | Reply

The state (NM) didn't make human trafficking a crime until 2008

Why is that?

Sounds crazy.

#5 | Posted by oneironaut

Why did trump kill the investigation into epstein's ranch in 2019?

That sounds even crazier.

#6 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2026-03-15 01:34 PM | Reply

>How Epstein Lured Girls

Oh! Oh! I know! [raises hand]

"Money!"

#1 | Posted by john_savage2

Like the hush money esptein's accountant sent to trump's victims?

#7 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2026-03-15 01:35 PM | Reply

Comer: Trump's first DOJ asked officials to end earlier probe of Epstein ranch in 2019

Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.) said Tuesday the Department of Justice (DOJ) asked New Mexico investigators to end a previous probe into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein's ranch in the state during President Trump's first term.

"I do know this: The federal government asked New Mexico to stop their investigation, I believe back in 2019, of that ranch," Comer, who chairs the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, told Fox News's Jesse Watters.

"So, there's just so many questions about how the government failed the victims and how government failed in trying to prosecute Epstein sooner," he continued. "I mean, this whole thing doesn't make sense."

thehill.com

#8 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2026-03-15 02:13 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

The state (NM) didn't make human trafficking a crime until 2008

Why is that?

Sounds crazy.

#5 | Posted by oneironaut

What's really crazy is you asking us instead of doing the research yourself and telling us what you found.

But here ya go.
...


New Mexico enacted its first specific human trafficking statute in July 2008, driven by the need for localized legal tools to prosecute traffickers, which previously relied on federal prosecution. This lag was due to trafficking being perceived as a rare problem, a lack of awareness, and the misconception that it required crossing international borders.

Previously, prosecutors relied on federal law (such as the 2000 Trafficking Victims Protection Act), but needed specific state statutes to handle cases more effectively.

Some states only passed such laws in 2003

Aren't you curious as to why it took them so long?

Probably not. But if you are ... Try your favorite AI or Google next time.

#9 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-03-15 03:05 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort