Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Wednesday, April 29, 2026

"I've made clear from the very beginning that our top priority is going to be to drive down the high cost of living," Jeffries told Fox News during an interview Sunday.

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

Also, Nancy Pelosi made this argument during the first term and had to be dragged kicking and screaming into impeachment, and we paid for it: www.politico.com/news/magazin ...

[image or embed]

-- Elizabeth Spiers (@espiers.bsky.social) Apr 27, 2026 at 12:42 PM

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

If it's possible to get rid of Hitler, get rid of Hitler.

But yes, and by all means, bring down prices so another Hitler can't use that as an excuse again.

#1 | Posted by Zed at 2026-04-29 11:47 AM | Reply

But maybe get rid of Hitler first so Hitler can't take credit for your hard work.

#2 | Posted by qcp at 2026-04-29 11:51 AM | Reply

Justice must be the priority of any person, agency, or organization.

"Well, we're not going to investigate mobster John Gotti because he keeps the neighborhood safe ana pays for fireworks every Fourth of July."

or

"What good will investigating Father Giuseppe do? So, he fiddle-faddled with some boys years ago. This priest fills the pews every Sunday. That's what the church needs. Full pews."

or

"You see, ICE doesn't need to be abolished, just reformed. They have have an important national security function of being able to deport undesirables without seeing an Immigration Judge. I proposed legislation requiring ICE thugs can't wear masks."

Hakeem Jeffries admitted to be an agent of the status quo, not an agent of progress for the American people.

Everybody on the planet knew this already.

#3 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-04-29 12:57 PM | Reply

"I've made clear from the very beginning that our top priority is going to be to drive down the high cost of living"

This is what happens when you market test your ideas in the wrong market.

The only clear path Democrats have to victory is to make good on Trump's promises to release the Epstein Files.

#4 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-04-29 01:36 PM | Reply

The other thing Democrats should do is support for Free National Voter ID, which would force Republicans to oppose Free National Voter ID, something Republicans already oppose, but nobody ever forces them to explain why.

#5 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-04-29 01:45 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1


The other thing Democrats should do is support for Free National Voter ID, which would force Republicans to oppose Free National Voter ID, something Republicans already oppose, but nobody ever forces them to explain why.
#5 | Posted by snoofy

This is an oddity. At a dinner party on Saturday I brought this issue up and none of the Republicans could articulate why this is a problem, though there were no Democrats able to articulate a reason either.

Because Democrats don't seem to like it either?

"There are only three problems with a national ID: Republicans hate it, Libertarians hate it, and Democrats hate it," says Kathleen Unger, the founder of VoteRiders, an organization devoted to helping people obtain ID.
www.theatlantic.com

Rather old but will the ACLU change its mind? This is in regard to the 9/11 Commission report.

"We all want a country that is as safe as possible," said Marvin Johnson, an ACLU Legislative Counsel. "But 'Big Brother' provisions such as a national ID card would only serve to restrict our freedoms and invade our privacy and do nothing to ensure our security."
www.aclu.org

Regarding the topic, this is just "dust" its obfuscation, just look at what Spanberger did, campaigned in the middle, went CRAZY with taxation on NEW taxes on electric landscaping equipment.

#6 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-04-29 02:27 PM | Reply

Nobody here believes another person would invite you into their home, you lying pedophile pile of ----

#7 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-04-29 03:59 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

He's an AIPAC piggy.

#8 | Posted by fresno500 at 2026-04-30 12:57 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 3

#9 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-04-30 01:12 AM | Reply

Guardian of the status quo Nancy Pelosi net worth: $250 million

"Nancy Pelosi is not shy to let her constituents know her family has a legacy of being bought out by Israeli lobbyists."

Source: www.boughtbyzionism.org

#10 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-04-30 01:25 AM | Reply

He is lying.

#11 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-04-30 03:49 AM | Reply

Of course, pedoringer would lament the orange chomo facing charges.

Because he's a piece of s*&^.

#12 | Posted by jpw at 2026-04-30 03:57 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Go blow a trucker. Jeffries is lying. Wanna impeach Trump? Go ahead. But don't lie and claim it's not a Dem priority. It's their entire existence right now.

#13 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-04-30 04:25 AM | Reply | Funny: 1

Back to Lil' Jeffy's pathetic blowing truckers fantasies ... again?

Hey, kid, if you're that fixated, obviously hankering that much, just go do it. Nobody else here seems to share your unbridled yen for truckers and blowing same. Droning on and on about your real or imagined burning yearnings makes you sound like a low information, slack of Jack greasy little MAGAt. You really want that or ... are that? Try another bandwidth.

#14 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2026-04-30 04:43 AM | Reply

Wanna impeach Trump? Go ahead. But don't lie and claim it's not a Dem priority

#13 | Posted by BellRinger

It's a national priority.

Trump in private compares himself to Julius Caesar and Alexander the Great.

Nice if you would take the side of sane America for a change.

#15 | Posted by Zed at 2026-04-30 07:39 AM | Reply

He is lying.

#11 | Posted by BellRinger

I hope so!

Oversight and justice are imperative to a functioning society.

But I also think that while Jeffries knows Trump SHOULD be impeached for several issues, it will be impossible to get a conviction and subsequent removal through the Senate. The best we can probably hope for, even if Dems take majorities in both houses of Congress, is some obstruction of further damage to our Republic.

#16 | Posted by Whatsleft at 2026-04-30 12:52 PM | Reply

Impeachment is worthless without removal.
Orange Adolf has been impeached twice and is still in office.
Impeachment without removal is useless.

#17 | Posted by a_monson at 2026-04-30 02:20 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Sure, the impeachment over the fake evidence that Hillary provided, and the other about a phone call where he asked for someone to look into Hunter for illegal actions that were proven true? What will they impeach him for this time? Breaking up OPEC, because cheaper oil increases climate change?

#18 | Posted by fishpaw at 2026-04-30 02:35 PM | Reply

" ... the impeachment over the fake evidence that Hillary provided"

" ... a phone call where he asked for someone to look into Hunter for illegal actions ... "

And The Truth hasn't even put his pants on yet!

Please tell me what "news" outlet is feeding you this crap so I can be sure to avoid it at all costs.

#19 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-04-30 02:46 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 5

What will they impeach him (Donald) for this time?

#18 | POSTED BY FISHPAW

Fraud.

Organized crime.

Violation(s) of Federal Law.

If you ask me to go on, I will.

#20 | Posted by Zed at 2026-04-30 03:01 PM | Reply

Did Hillary create the fake dossier? If you said no then why did she pay a campaign finance fine for not disclosing it?
Hunter's laptop exposed his tax fraud and compromising relationships with foreign governments. You and the left said it was all made up by Russians. Do you still think his laptop was Russian disinformation? No one else with a brain does. Here's a tip, it will make you look smarter actually. Go to some other news outlets along with this one, read all sides and then make an intelligent decision. If it's a difference in policy then so be it, that works. But when you consistently go with conspiracy theories that are later proven to be wrong it might be wise to reach out.

#21 | Posted by fishpaw at 2026-04-30 04:50 PM | Reply

But when you consistently go with conspiracy theories that are later proven to be wrong it might be wise to reach out.

#21 | POSTED BY FISHPAW

That Donald Trump is a criminal is not a conspiracy theory. That he is protecting rich and wealthy sexual abusers in the Epstein Files is.

For now.

#22 | Posted by Zed at 2026-04-30 04:58 PM | Reply

Hakeem Jeffries should take a moment to ask Netanyahu for his next job, he's soon going to be voted out.

Schumer, Jeffries and the rest of the AIPAC owned, Israel first Democrats are done.

Bye bye.

#23 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-04-30 05:07 PM | Reply

Hunter's laptop exposed his tax fraud and compromising relationships with foreign governments.

You're just this stupid, aren't you.

Clinging on to a conspiracy theory instead of realizing you're describing Trump and Kushner.

Kushner who is somehow accepting billions from Middle Eastern nations while playing as a negotiator.

Who knew being a rich kid who dabbled in real estate would be so qualified.

#24 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-04-30 05:11 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

Hey, Clownshack!


#25 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-04-30 05:29 PM | Reply

Well hey there!

Just another day in capitalist paradise.

I hope to produce enough profit for my employer to live comfortably before I outlive my usefulness.

May we all fit perfectly into the cogs we've been assigned.

#26 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-04-30 05:59 PM | Reply

There were some bosses in the private sector and US military where I was more than happy to make them look good or make money together.

Those were the menschs.

The others, oh well.


#27 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-04-30 07:01 PM | Reply

LOL bunch of filthy lying demtards. Lie about their motives, lie about who they're representing, lie about the very nature of reality. All they do is lie lie lie lie and lie some more

#28 | Posted by THEBULL at 2026-05-01 02:30 PM | Reply

MAGAts are so pathetic. Their desperate childish need to project their own behavior and desires onto Dems is both revealing and fascinating. MAGATs are obsessed with prosecuting their opponents. A delusional fixation based on insecurity, stupidity and uncontrollable rage.

#29 | Posted by moder8 at 2026-05-01 03:08 PM | Reply

And the DNC executive committee still refuses to release the official autopsy report of why the Democrats lost their incumbency on Tuesday 5 Nov 1968.

Oops, I meant Tuesday 5 Nov 2024.

#30 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-05-01 03:26 PM | Reply

AIPAC Shakur demonstrates, again, why the Dems will keep snatching defeat from sure victory.

#28 | Posted by THEBULL
Reality has a liberal bias. Get used to it.

#31 | Posted by morris at 2026-05-01 03:43 PM | Reply

Americans are sick and tired of foreign interference in US elections, whether it's the Russians, Chinese, or Israelis.

Once the foreigners are out, maybe we can get more than the average 65% voter turnout on election days.


AIPAC headquarters is located at 251 H Street Northwest, Washington, DC 20001.

FBI HQ is a mere 0.7 miles away from AIPAC HQ; roughly a 12 to 15 minute walk or a 4 to 5 minute drive.

Bring the cuffs, collect the reward.

#32 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-05-01 04:04 PM | Reply

#30

Trump hammered Democrats on transgender issues. Now the party is at odds on a response

By Bill Barrow and Marc Levy

NOV. 14, 2024

https://www.ap.org/news-highlights/spotlights/2024/trump-hammered-democrats-on-transgender-issues-
now-the-party-is-at-odds-on-a-response/

-----

ATLANTA (AP) " After losing the White House and both houses of Congress, Democrats are grappling with how to handle transgender politics and policy following a campaign that featured withering and often misleading GOP attacks on the issue.

There is plenty of second-guessing after President-elect Donald Trump anchored his victory over Vice President Kamala Harris with sweeping promises on the economy and immigration. But Democrats also will not soon forget the punchline in anti-transgender Trump ads that became ubiquitous by Election Day: "Kamala is for they/them; President Trump is for you."

"Week by week when that ad hit and stuck and we didn't respond, I think that was the beginning of the end," former Democratic Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell said of the 30-second spot that was part of $215 million in anti-transgender advertising by Trump and Republicans, according to tracking firm AdImpact.

"They painted her as something I don't think she is," Rendell said. "They painted her as a far-left liberal."

The fallout leaves some progressive and moderate Democrats struggling between the party's modern identity as a champion of civil rights and its electoral fortunes across swaths of America with whom those attacks resonated.

"There are just a number of issues where we're out of touch," Rep. Seth Moulton, a moderate Massachusetts Democrat said in an interview, days after he set off recriminations within his party for saying he didn't want his daughters playing in sports against biological males. Critics said Moulton echoed Trump's talking points about liberals allowing "men to compete in women's sports."

"I think that Republicans have a hateful position on trans issues," Moulton told The Associated Press, but insisted that Democrats still lose voters because of the party's "attitude."

"Rather than talk down to you and tell you what to believe," he argued, Democrats should "listen to hard-working Americans."

LGBTQ+ advocates, meanwhile, are arguing that the 2024 election turned more on economic issues than Trump's transgender rhetoric. They're urging political leaders to counter misinformation that they say threatens the health and safety of transgender Americans, who make up less than 1% U.S. population.

"Trans people have been existing and co-existing," receiving health care and participating in society for years, said Sarah Kate Ellis, CEO of GLAAD, a leading LGBTQ+ advocacy group. "Nothing new happened," Ellis said, other than Republicans singling them out in a presidential campaign year.

"It didn't change one vote," Ellis argued. "But it did make the world way more dangerous for trans people."

Another Democratic Massachusetts lawmaker, Rep. Ayanna Pressley, didn't name Moulton, but said some reactions to the election "scapegoated and dehumanized" transgender people. "This Congresswoman sees you and loves you," Pressley wrote on the social media platform X.

#33 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-01 04:15 PM | Reply

Certainly it's difficult, if not impossible, to pinpoint single issues that can tip a national election, and there are mixed findings on what voters think about transgender rights.

According to AP VoteCast, a survey of more than 120,000 people who cast ballots this fall, more than half of voters said support for transgender rights in government and society has gone too far. About 2 in 10 said support has not gone far enough and another 2 in 10 said it's about right. But among Trump voters, 85% said transgender support had gone too far.

Still, slightly more than half of all voters oppose banning gender affirming medical treatment such as hormone therapy and puberty blockers, while slightly less than half support such proposals.

About one-quarter of Harris voters said support for transgender rights in government and society has gone too far. About 4 in 10 said it's been about right and about 4 in 10 said it hasn't gone far enough.

Trump and Republicans were relentless in trying to capitalize on the issue. They piled on transgender athletes, with Trump falsely labeling two Olympic boxers as transgender women. They used Harris' comments as a presidential candidate in 2019 - before she became vice president - effectively to blame her for laws granting transgender health care to federal prisoners and detainees.

And Trump repeatedly and falsely claimed that "your kid goes to school and comes home a few days later with an operation" changing their sex.

#34 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-01 04:16 PM | Reply

In reality, the Biden administration has held that Title IX bars discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity " but Education Department rules do not explicitly address transgender athletes. Federal law that Trump ads cited does require people in U.S. government custody to have access to gender-affirming medical treatments. Those policies were in place throughout Trump's 2017-21 term; they are not something Biden's administration instituted specifically.

And it is not legal in any state for a school to determine and carry out surgical treatment for minor students.

"You gotta fight back" with those explanations, Moulton said, adding that the silence compounds the negative effects for transgender people. "What did we show about our willingness to stand up for trans people by just being silent and ignoring the issue and ignoring the attack?"

Still, Moulton said Democratic leaders on Capitol Hill and in statehouses should give individual elected officials and voters the space to take more conservative positions, and he defended his own comments that he doesn't want his daughters competing in athletics against men.

"I don't want them getting run over on a playing field by a male or formerly male athlete, but as a Democrat I'm supposed to be afraid to say that," Moulton told The New York Times last week.

Before he resigned his post as Texas Democratic chairman, Gilberto Hinojosa said supporting transgender rights doesn't necessarily have to include public funding for gender reassignment surgery.

"We can say, 'OK, we respect people's right to say, we don't want my taxpayer money to be used for that,'" Hinojosa told Texas Public Radio. Hinojosa later apologized via social media, saying LGBTQ Americans "deserve to feel seen, valued and safe in our state and our party."

Ellis, the CEO of GLAAD, pointed to Delaware voters choosing to make state Sen. Sarah McBride the first transgender member of Congress as evidence that Americans "don't hate trans people."

For her part, McBride, a Democrat from Delaware, noted that she did not run on her identity " though it was not a secret " and instead talked to voters about "affordable health care, housing and child care" for everyone.

"The party that was focused on culture wars, the party that was focused on trans people was the Republican Party," McBride told reporters on Capitol Hill after her victory. "It was Donald Trump," she added, who "was trying to divide and distract from the fact that he has absolutely no policy solutions for the issues that are actually keeping voters up at night."

#35 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-01 04:17 PM | Reply

I believe that there's a much simpler explanation for the Harris/Walz loss in 2024:

Throughout the month of October, 2024, the Trump campaign (and associated entities) spent $300,000,000.00 on ads in all 7 swing states during televised NFL and NCAA football games. The topic of all of those ads? Then-CA Attorney General Kamala Harris' 2019 response to a question about a Trump administration dictate on gender-affirming (read: trans) care for federal inmates


click graphic above for actual She's for They/Them ad

And the amount of money the Harris campaign spent countering those She's for They/Them ads in the swing states during NFL and NCAA football games? You know, to point out the truth that she was simply responding to a question about a Trump administration dictate on gender-affirming for federal inmates? To counter the deceptive, the lying-by-omission ads run by Trump & company?

Zero dollars

The efficacy of this strategy was born out election night, 2024, when Steve Kornacki was calling individual counties (starting with Pennsylvania) and highlighting that the Harris/Walz ticket was falling short of votes as opposed to the votes in the 2020 election for the Biden/Harris ticket. His reporting was, in effect, a death by 1,000 cuts for Harris/Walz.

Trump & company knew that all it would take would be the suppression of Biden votes in 2024 by just a point or two for Trump to carry those counties, all 7 swing states and, ultimately, the election. They judged, correctly, that men - men of color and white - would be turned off enough by the "pro-trans" Harris that they voted for Trump, or didn't vote at all.

Either way, mission accomplished.

#36 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-01 04:18 PM | Reply

Why Kamala Harris lost: A flawed candidate or doomed campaign?

Wrong voters, wrong message: progressives' autopsy lays bare Kamala Harris failures

Why Kamala Harris lost the election

Brookings: Why Donald Trump won and Kamala Harris lost: An early analysis of the results

There is no one reason Harris lost

Politicians and activists are trying to sell disingenuous and nonfactual explanations of why Harris lost to push their ideology. Don't fall for it.
Democrats were united and turned out. Harris lost anyway.
Voters issued a broad repudiation of not only Harris' campaign but the Democratic Party's vision for the country.
A Former Republican Strategist on Why Harris Lost
Inflation, moderation, and candidate effects
What Was the Biggest Factor in Kamala Harris's Defeat?

#37 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-01 04:33 PM | Reply

LOL bunch of filthy lying demtards. Lie about their motives, lie about who they're representing, lie about the very nature of reality. All they do is lie lie lie lie and lie some more

#28 | Posted by THEBULL

Tell me, are you colossally stupid and completely lacking in self-awareness or are you just a dishonest piece of s*&^?

#38 | Posted by jpw at 2026-05-01 04:46 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort