Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Thursday, June 04, 2026

California's first-ever anti-data center ballot measure is shaping up to be an absolute shellacking for the tech industry -- part of a wave of opposition rising across the country, as communities and lawmakers grapple with the frenzied push to build AI infrastructure.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

More from the article ...

... Monterey Park, a city of 60,000 people about 10 miles east of downtown Los Angeles, placed a measure on Tuesday's ballot asking voters if they wanted to prohibit data centers in their city. The response, so far, has been an unequivocal "yes," with 86 percent of votes counted as of Wednesday afternoon in favor of the proposal.

Local officials and environmental organizers said they hope the drubbing will spur other cities to enact similar bans.

"A lot of the other cities that are facing data center proposals are going to follow suit," Elizabeth Yang, the city's mayor, said on Tuesday. "There's [a] bad reputation across the board, across the country, from other data centers that have been built in neighborhoods." ...


#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-06-04 10:14 PM | Reply

'The Most Bipartisan Issue Since Beer': Opposition to Data Centers
www.nytimes.com

... Americans have soured on data centers, polls show, and the sentiment is profoundly bipartisan. How will that change our politics?

The monthly meeting in Lyon Township, a small town in southeast Michigan, was packed on a recent Monday, even though the main item on the agenda was an easement for a drain.

Residents, holding notes and water bottles, lined up at the mic to talk about the actual issue on everybody's minds: the proposed large-scale data center.

They had come prepared.

"Just a reminder," said a man in a black puffer vest, who identified himself as Larry. "An N.F.L. football field is 57,600 square feet. A 1.8-million-square-foot hyperscale data center is about 32 football fields."

A motorcyclist asked about the potential effects on traffic. Someone asked if the proper procedure had been followed to preserve a habitat of endangered bats. A woman in a pink shirt played a recording of noise from a data center in another Michigan town.

When a town board member gently interrupted a speaker to say her time was up, she exclaimed, "I haven't even gotten off my first page!"

Lyon Township voted for Donald J. Trump in 2024, but party loyalties hardly seemed to matter. In an era when Americans are divided on everything -- even the cars they drive and the TV shows they watch -- data centers seem to have bridged the partisan divide.

Early evidence suggests that Americans -- once agnostic -- are now souring on them. Last month, Maine became the first state to pass a moratorium on data centers -- only to have the governor, a Democrat, veto it -- and similar measures have been introduced in at least 13 other states and dozens of municipalities. ...


#2 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-06-04 10:24 PM | Reply

Why would you even put a data center in California, where electricity is expensive, and building codes are strict?

The years I spent in California showed me an America that's better for more people.

California is a pretty good example of you get what you pay for.

California could scale to America it already does with emissions and Prop 65 labeling.

#3 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-06-04 10:25 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

@#3 ... Why would you even put a data center in California, where electricity is expensive, and building codes are strict? ...

Simple, the land purchased was cheap.

Now it is up to the utility to supply the electricity for a cost the customer will accept. Ditto for the building codes.

The money behind the AI data centers wields political consequences for those politicians who oppose it in favor of acting for the citizens they represent.


#4 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-06-04 10:37 PM | Reply

Simple, the land purchased was cheap.

You've never built anything have you?

The cost of the land is only a small percentage of the issue for building in CA. My home is 70% of the price, 30% is the land.

Also the property owner/developer, is financially responsible for paying to run new power lines to your building. Given its a datacenter, its going to cost the price of the land to just bring the power to the building.

On top of all this, its incredibly expensive to build, labor, materials, environmental permits in CA.

#5 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-06-04 11:50 PM | Reply

" The cost of the land is only a small percentage of the issue for building in CA. My home is 70% of the price, 30% is the land."

That depends on where you are. In SF, LA, SD, and SJ, it's not unusual for the land to be worth more than the building on it.

Especially important in rental properties, since land is not depreciable.

#6 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-06-05 12:14 AM | Reply

@#3 ... Why would you even put a data center in California, where electricity is expensive, and building codes are strict? ...

Thoiugh, i do have to add to my comment ...

You raise good points.

So the question that seems to remain open is ... why build a data center in California?

Found this ...

Abundance clashes with affordability in California's data center debate (June 2025)
www.politico.com

... For a state that considers itself a leader in both tech and climate, California is falling behind in both building data centers and putting guardrails around their environmental impacts.

Democrats in Sacramento are taking cues from lawmakers in Indiana, Ohio and West Virginia as they explore special electricity rates for data centers aimed at controlling costs for other customers. They're also weighing new energy reporting standards to better understand the supercomputers' impacts on California's electric grid.

Those proposals come as electric utilities are embracing data centers as a potential business savior that promises to increase electrical demand several fold after an era of energy efficiency.

"This trend is absolutely real for us," Pacific Gas and Electric CEO Patti Poppe said during the utility's most recent quarterly earnings call in April. "This will be so beneficial for our customers."

The handful of bills this year are a reaction to PG&E's November 2024 application to energy regulators for a special tariff for all the new data centers it anticipates connecting to its grid in Northern California " enough to require the power of roughly 6.5 million new homes in the next 10 years and four times the output of its Diablo Canyon nuclear plant. Tentatively planned projects would add an additional 1.5 million homes' worth of power.

"It's a big change, and not expected," said Hunter Stern, assistant business manager with IBEW 1245, which represents PG&E electrical workers. "For years, California's goal was to reduce emissions through efficiency and load growth was an indication that emissions would be going up, and we've changed that."

But for ratepayer and environmental advocates, it could go either way: Data centers could, if managed properly, bring down the per-customer grid costs that have been dominating the political conversation for months -- or they could leave ratepayers with costly stranded assets and even outpace the growth of renewable energy on the grid. ...


#7 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-06-05 12:14 AM | Reply

@#6 ... Especially important in rental properties, since land is not depreciable. ...

Yeah, I have to wonder how that aspect may affect the placement of a datacenter in California.

This afternoon, I was driving up rt7 here, through Wilton and Redding, CT.

As I drove past the wooded areas on both sides of that Federal road, I remembered what was once told to be ...

The wooded areas on the sides of that route are all privately owned.

#8 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-06-05 12:29 AM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort