" Its always next year."

Except these were by design, knowing there'd be blowback if they took effect BEFORE the midterms.

Much like the tax breaks that expire three weeks before Trump leaves office.

" we can point to all groups that drag down the average
inner cities
minorities
public schools"

You're right. But all states have those groups.

Red states still rate worst.

" It's more like 700 since the Shelby decision"

IOW, forcing folks to wait hours in line is a GREAT way to suppress the vote!

" Distinctions without differences."

Huh?

"A Short video, notifications, algorithmic feeds, constant task-switching, reduced long-form reading, less boredom, less unstructured thought."

Excellent summation, and excellent point.

AU, check your email.

"We're watching the exact same heartbreak express pull out of the station"

Yep.

This will come down to who COUNTS the vote.

The Pedo Party wins.

"Communism???? How can she use that term? It's not fair!!!!"

You're literally minimizing bald-faced lies.

Where do you believe defending lies and liars puts you on the moral scale?

"Workers' Share of America's Income Is at a Record Low"

Ooof.

Historically, not a good omen for the billionaire class.

" Communism???? How can she use that term? It's not fair!!!!"

Meanwhile, Republicans are actively protecting child sex traffickers and perpetrators. No one has to create a fake complaint.

But both parties are the same, right?

Mike Johnson is framing it as Republicans versus Communism.

Of course, he can't name a single Democrat (or Republican for that matter) who has called for a classless society and the end of private property.

Looks like he's using Vernon's Dictionary.

"my son just graduated Northwestern with a 3.98 in math and a 3.98 in another major... "

Congratulations! Great individual achievement, but that also reflects excellent parenting.

Same for OCU. Congratulations!

And iirc, Eberly also has a standout student. Way to go!

"Most here would simply just accuse you of being nothing more than an -------."

Not if you actually knew the reference before looking it up.

" I asked your belief and you danced around it by quoting Balzac."

Yeah, that's one way it works around here. I referenced because I agree.

Could you not figure that out? Or do you actually believe I referenced it because I disagree?

"A Mighty Hot Dog is our Lord"

His Boolsheet ever fa-a-ai-ling

So ... somebody with a dog in the hunt is going to decide which ballots we count, and which ballots we don't?!?

What could possibly go wrong?

Seriously, ask yourself that. Then brace for worse.

"I'm interrupting your pity party."

So...unfamiliar with Balzac as well?

Or will you be claiming you were aware of the quote all along?

"and 0.0 for the right to organize"

This is what I voted for.
~Subliterate

"not sure why you give a ---- what I think about the relationship between morals and wealth"

Isn't that the central issue in the discussion?

"If I don't give you the answer you need, I'm a liar."

No, that's only for when you claim something untrue.

"I'll reverse it and ask you the same question. complementary or inverse?"

Well, according to Balzac, inverse.

"when did you ask anything like that?"

What, you don't know how to search a word like "inverse" on the page???

Post #65.

" What is ironic for Danforth is it applies to a bigger faction of the left."

"The left" doesn't vote to enable an entire party of pedophile protectors.

That would be you.

" Moral ghetto" is hilarious to me."

Another poster shows their ass.

" Is this some ------ up way to accuse me of not being aware there are immoral people in the world?"

No.

Merely pointing out the purse-swinging when I referenced a concept you'd never heard of.

I'll go back to my central question: generally speaking, are morals and wealth complementary, or inverse?

"I googled the term as I was admitting I wasn't familiar with it."

"I knew it existed"

FFS, you didn't know the concept existed.