@#1

United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability

Rep Comer and Rep Jordan?

Given the apparent prior very questionable investigations of the two Representatives, why should this one be trusted?

@#4 ... I'll have to read the report but the short article doesn't suggest this is anything more than a political hit job ...

Yeah, in my reading, that's my current view as well.

My view, as always, remains to be changed.

@#37 ... smells like crapola to me... ...

That's my view as well.

It just seems to reiterate conspiracy theories that have been debunked in the past.

@#36 ... A lab leak! ...

Even if it were a lab leak, the concern I expressed at the time, and a concern I still have...

The United States was being invaded by a foreign entity (the COVID-19 virus).

And what did Pres-elect Trump do at the time?

He aided the enemy in its invasion through his actions and inaction.

Resulting in thousands (tens of thousands?, hundreds of thousands?) deaths of Americans.

Perhaps this report was released trying to cover up that aspect of the COVID-19 pandemic?

@#48 ... Fauci admitted there was NO SCIENTIFIC BASIS to the 6 foot distance. Look it up. ...

At the time, little was known about the virus besides the fact that many people people getting sick from it and flooding hospital emergency rooms. To the point that the hospitals set up beds under tents in their parking lots to accommodate the overflow.

At the time, it was also recommended that the goods you take home from grocery stores be wiped down with a disinfecting towelette. It was not yet known how the virus was transmitted, via touch, or airborne? All that was known was that the virus was being transmitted person-to-person, and quite easily.

@#56 ... it was admitted that it had no scientific basis. ...

Got a link?

@#63

Your alias is making the assertion, it should provide the link.

Otherwise, imo, you got nothing.

Also, is your assertion that there should be no distancing, or just that the "six-foot" distancing is bad?

Does your alias think that three-foot distancing is also bad?

What about one- or two-foot distancing?

As I said, your alias is making the assertion, it is not up to me to substantiate it.

@#67 ... Lamplighter chooses willful ignorance. ...

Projecting (yet) again?

How does your alias know that I do not already know the answer, but I am just trying to get your alias to enter a conversation?

I asked some simple questions in #64, and your #68 sidesteps answering those simple questions.

Quite telling.

And I do note that your alias still has not provided a link to substantiate that 6-foot assertion or, for that matter, apparently anything else it asserts.

@#71 ... In other countries it was two meters, which is more like 6 66 feet. ...

6 feet x 0.3048 feet/meter = 6.56167979

@#79 ... Keep your distance, wearing masks, weren't to prevent you from getting COVID. They were meant to mitigate the spread. ...

My view is that masks slow the propagation of the virus, whether on the transmittal or receiving end.

Masks are a barrier that slow the propagation.

I look at people in an operating room all wearing masks.

In my opinion, that scenario for wearing mask is about the personnel in the operating room not passing ~thing~ to the open insides of the person they are operating on.

Regarding COVID, it was likely that someone infected could transmit COVID to others before that person even knew they were infected. So, self-isolation wold be too late under those circumstances.

@#84 ... Not sure why we're rehashing this. It's done. Covid won. ...

Yup.

(and, fwiw, I agree with your #83)

Yes, the United States was being attacked by a foreign entity (the COVID virus) and the Republicans, led by Pres-elect Trump in his first term, decided to join the invasion entity instead of trying to protect Americans from the invasion.

@#83 ... decided the virus could be useful for eliminating densely populated regions. Specifically cities which tended to have more democrat and independent voters. ...

@#8 ... Trump's Disregard for Blue States Is at the Heart of His Shoddy COVID Response ...

So, back in his first term, Pres-elect Trump seemed to allow an invasion force to have its way because he thought that invasion force was targeting only his enemies (i.e., blue states).

And now, in Trump 2.0, he has indicated that he wants to use the US Military against his political enemies?

Am I the only one here who sees an apparent pattern of behavior?

@#80 ... Please provide proof of what you claim. ...

Good luck with that request of that alias.