Mmmm more like we aren't going to listen to activist judge's. Told you guys raiding Maralago was a dumb idea. You still would have lost the election but DeSantis would've been in there instead of Trump.

That's rich coming from a Democrat, the left's favorite pastime is trampling all over the constitution. Let's take guns for example, or how you've flagrantly abused the 14th Amendment when it comes to illegal's and "anchor babies." Then there's abuses you guys were more than happy to carry on with from neo-con -------- as it relates to the PATRIOT Act. You're not the sanctimonious crusaders of the Constitution you're projecting yourself to be.

You can thank Biden for showing Republicans how to ignore a judge's ruling and get away with it. Just remember, the slippery slope isn't that enjoyable when the shoe is on the other foot now is it?

Ohhh Laura, I think you're about to find out Birthright citizenship isn't enshrined in the constitution once SCOTUS hears the case. Sorry you guys don't like what the majority voted for. However, I'll leave you all with a word you loved using during the riots of 2020. COPE.

Clown, I'm referring to when Obama and the Democrat Congress had the chance to do away with it and instead of ending it, they decided to expand it k thx.

#9 Again you and the person who wrote that blog article are going to find out that anchor babies aren't included in the 14th amendment.

#11 I'm not here to convince you of anything Clown, I'm saying the Right is saying eff you to the Left's bureaucratic State and for the next two years we are doing whatever we'd like. That includes dismantling decades of -------- that has put the country into a perilous economic situation. Take care.

Ohhh if only you all understood what's probably about to happen next, from Dan Huff via X:

DOGE, a single district judge has issued a ruling blocking the executive branch from access to Treasury data. There's a simple fix: DOJ should demand injunction bonds. 1/
This will be a repeat problem for the Trump administration, just like it was in the first term, unless something is done to rein in frivolous injunctions. Activist judges could single-handedly gum up the entire Trump/DOGE agenda. 2/
Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(c), judges can issue injunctions "ONLY IF" the suing party posts a bond to cover potential damages if they're wrong. But guess what? This rule is hardly used! 3/
When I was in the White House, in Trump's first term, I suggested this, but DOJ didn't make it happen. Imagine if we had applied this to the travel ban " activists would think twice before blocking policies with potentially billions at stake. 4/
The government has expert economists who can easily price out the cost of policies like birthright citizenship or wasteful spending. Price injunction bonds fairly, and frivolous lawsuits become a financial risk, not a free pass. 5/
Without injunction bonds, the American people bear all the costs of activists and judges blocking the agenda they voted for. Why should activists and judges get to overrule the American people with no penalty if they're wrong? Our system wasn't meant to work this way. 6/
For national injunctions, we're talking bonds in the hundreds of millions or even billions. It will become prohibitive unless the activists have a slam dunk case. 7/
If a judge tries to lowball the bond amount, it's a quick and easy reversal given the unambiguous language in the federal rules. 8/
The best part? This doesn't block activists from court; it just stops them from using preliminary injunctions to pause government action based on arguments that might not hold up in an appellate court.

That is how you will be TKO'd.