Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Thursday, November 14, 2024

Senior officers in the U.S. military are preparing after reports of a potential new review process for top generals, a review they fear will vet personal loyalty to President-elect Donald Trump.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

"While the exact details of the proposed review board were unclear -- including who would serve as the arbiters of a general's leadership, though they would be appointed directly by the White House and would be veterans --

the senior uniformed military community immediately responded with concern that their commitment to avoiding politics would not be able to hold.

"The military is run by civilians, but the politics are supposed to stay outside," one currently serving Army lieutenant general told Military.com.

"It could be very hard to do our job if we have to constantly be making sure we're appeasing someone on a political or partisan level."

'

"The creation of a separate review process reporting directly to Trump that is outside of the existing job performance system could impose a chilling loyalty test --

not to the Constitution or military code, but to a president known for prioritizing personal loyalty, currently serving generals and defense officials interviewed say."

#1 | Posted by Corky at 2024-11-13 06:19 PM | Reply

Nobody owes that fat sack of ---- Trump anything.

#2 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2024-11-13 07:01 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

This is a terrible move.

The Generals will switch to state guards if we're lucky.

If we're not they'll serve other countries unless America needs them unexpectedly....

#3 | Posted by Tor at 2024-11-13 07:20 PM | Reply

Switching to a National Guard position is highly unlikely. Flag rank is rare and tends to come up through the ranks within the state. I've never served under an AG (adjutant general) that came from the active duty except for a few that went to West Point went to the N.G. after active service, coming in no higher than a Captain.
I would expect several will take their retirement, security clearance and head for corporate merica.

#4 | Posted by mattm at 2024-11-13 07:46 PM | Reply

Maybe a minor detail Tor, but N.G. rank has to be conferred by the Pentagon.
I waited two years after the state approved the promotion to go from Major to LTC.

#5 | Posted by mattm at 2024-11-13 07:49 PM | Reply

Most governors would love to have generals running their guard.

#6 | Posted by Tor at 2024-11-13 07:49 PM | Reply

Every Governor has a general running the State National Guard, Adjutant General.
en.wikipedia.org

Scroll down a ways to see the list, they are two-star generals, a member of their states National Guard, can be Army or Air Force.

#7 | Posted by mattm at 2024-11-13 09:01 PM | Reply

Remember Tuberville's adventure in holding up military promotions? That affected the reserves and guard as well.

#8 | Posted by mattm at 2024-11-13 09:04 PM | Reply

I waited two years after the state approved the promotion to go from Major to LTC.

#5 | Posted by mattm

Well shizz man.

#9 | Posted by jpw at 2024-11-14 02:50 AM | Reply

This is a good way to ensure a military coup should a Democrat get elected.

#10 | Posted by Sycophant at 2024-11-14 11:00 AM | Reply

Here are some statistics on sexual assault in the U.S. military:
2023 prevalence
The prevalence of sexual assault in the military decreased in 2023 compared to 2021:
Women: The rate of unwanted sexual contact for active duty women decreased from 8.4% in 2021 to 6.8% in 2023.
Men: The rate of unwanted sexual contact for active duty men decreased from 1.5% in 2021 to 1.3% in 2023, but this change was not statistically significant.
Total reports: The Department of Defense received 8,515 reports of sexual assault in 2023, which is a decrease from 8,942 in 2022

"""""""""""""""""""""""WOKE""""""""""""""""""""""" Military

#11 | Posted by truthhurts at 2024-11-14 11:19 AM | Reply

The US military has faced and continues to face racial discrimination and other challenges, including:
Racial discrimination in the ranks
A 2017 survey found that many service members reported racial discrimination or harassment, including 31.2% of Black/African American service members, 23.3% of Asian American troops, and 21% of Hispanic troops.
Disparities in military justice
Black and Hispanic service members are disproportionately investigated and court-martialed. For example, Black sailors are 40% more likely to be referred to court-martial than white sailors in the Navy, and Black soldiers are 61% more likely in the Army.
Racial disparities in the military death penalty
A study found that the race of the accused and victim influenced charging and sentencing decisions in death-penalty cases.
Lack of diversity in military service academies
The student population at the academies doesn't reflect the diversity of the rest of the nation. In 2021, non-white cadets accounted for between 36% and 40% of the military service academies' student body.
Structural racism
Some say the military needs to do more to address structural racism, including adding questions to climate surveys that explicitly ask about racism

""""""""""""""""WOKE"""""""""""" Military

#12 | Posted by truthhurts at 2024-11-14 11:20 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

No one stop Trump from nuking a country...or hurricane...

#13 | Posted by Sycophant at 2024-11-14 04:27 PM | Reply

Fealty to a political leader is getting a lot of Russian troops killed. A lot of Russian generals too ...

#14 | Posted by catdog at 2024-11-14 09:54 PM | Reply

Well he said he wanted generals like Hitler had. The old Prussian officer corp commonly referred to them as "nodding donkeys".
You'll need to make a large list of reasons The Reich lost The Great Patriotic War. Somewhere near the top will be the loyalty oaths and purges Hitler imposed on the men who actually knew how to fight a war.

#15 | Posted by BluSky at 2024-11-15 07:02 AM | Reply

This is it, the Red Line for American Democracy.
IF the military capitulates, and 'bends the knee',
then we have 'Officially Transitioned to an Authoritarian State'.

#16 | Posted by earthmuse at 2024-11-15 07:53 AM | Reply

Too many high level fully politicized military officers view promotions and war or side bar defense as their primary goal. Too many Dems see DEI politics and another promotion by another Dem leftist as their only goal.

#17 | Posted by Robson at 2024-11-15 06:12 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

O-8 is typical. They wanted women in combat because axx kissing politicians wanted women dying for politics.

#18 | Posted by Robson at 2024-11-15 06:18 PM | Reply

@#17 ... Too many high level fully politicized military officers view promotions and war or side bar defense as their primary goal. ...

Got evidence?

#19 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-11-15 06:29 PM | Reply

Pres-elect Trump has never had a respect for those who protect the Country.

During his first term, he pulled many military officers into his administrator, almost as if to show his vacuous respect.

But then, those military officials, who had sworn allegiance to the Constitution and not to a person, started having issues with then Pres Trump.

So, am I the only one who has noticed a difference in Pres-elect Trump's burgeoning administration?

The current administration that seems to be building seems to have an allegiance, almost an adulation, to Pres-elect Trump.

Not to the Constitution.

#20 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-11-15 11:06 PM | Reply

"dUh, wE wAnt a LiSt oF eVeRy gEnErAl"

~ Fake pDh

#21 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2024-11-16 08:19 AM | Reply | Funny: 1

Putin's hurting, but he's banked on Trump to rescue him from the quagmire caused by his ill-advised and costly aggression vs Ukraine. Why would Trump save Putin vs Ukraine? Trump's not a brilliant American patriot. He's a calculating transaction-focused gamer. He thinks alliances are great as long as he sees the clear-short term benefit (primarily to him). For Saudi Arabia, it's because the Prince invested $2 billion in Jared's LBO firm. For Russia, its because Putin's bank has lent Trump Inc. hundreds of millions that is still on the books. And because Trump hates Zelensky because Zelensky did not throw Biden's son under the bus and because Trump got impeached as a result of a "perfect" conversation with Zelensky.

So, here's another question. Why is Trump choosing not just ill-prepared & incompetent cabinet nominees, but largely odd-ball characters who will be toxic to the government agencies they have been nominated to control and who, as a whole, will wreck those agencies of national policy and protection and America's National Security Council, which weighs in on any and all situations affecting America's safety and international security? It doesn't take a PhD to recognize a sinister and dangerous pattern.

Putin's been spending $ and FSB efforts to destabilize democracies & NATO. Putin's regime has helped "populist" autocratic movements thrive in Hungary & Slovakia and increasingly contributes to help increasingly stronger autocratic-leaning "populist" movements in Germany, France, and Netherlands. (And America?) Why? Go ahead, think about it.

Before Trump's official nominees come up for confirmation, next year's GOP US Senate's members need to dig deeper into why would their consenting to the creation of an Executive Branch Cabinet (and especially the next National Security Council) nearly fully created to help America's enemy Putin and to create chaos across America's institutions and our alliances with liberal democracies in NATO and around the world be in America's best interest? Is it in America's best interest, or would those senators rather sell out what moral courage they have and the nation just to avoid Trump's ire?

Where is the national interest in the Cabinet & National Security Council that Trump is building? His ingredients are a suicidal recipe for our national security and for America's Constitution.

If Congress gives its consent to Trump's Cabinet picks "recipe", it will create chaos throughout our national intelligence and national defense establishments.

Just ask any former SECDEF or FBI or counter intel agency leader about their feelings about Trump's proposed Cabinet's intent. They'll agree, the creation as a whole will be more destructive than the sum of its parts. Beware.

#22 | Posted by Augustine at 2024-11-16 09:11 AM | Reply

With every Cabinet pick and policy proposed and enacted ask yourself one simple question: Who benefits? In many cases the answer will not be the American people.

#23 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2024-11-16 10:29 AM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2024 World Readable

Drudge Retort