Advertisement
Top Military Brass Brace for Trump's Loyalty Review Boards
Senior officers in the U.S. military are preparing after reports of a potential new review process for top generals, a review they fear will vet personal loyalty to President-elect Donald Trump.
Menu
Front Page Breaking News Comments Flagged Comments Recently Flagged User Blogs Write a Blog Entry Create a Poll Edit Account Weekly Digest Stats Page RSS Feed Back Page
Subscriptions
Read the Retort using RSS.
RSS Feed
Author Info
Corky
Joined 2005/05/24Visited 2024/11/12
Status: user
MORE STORIES
Top Military Brass Brace for Trump's Loyalty Review Boards (13 comments) ...
Trump Israel Ambassador Pick Mike Huckabee is Longtime Ally of Settlers (6 comments) ...
Arizona Attorney General Won't Drop Trump Fake Electors Case (5 comments) ...
The End of America's Well-Intentioned Empire (40 comments) ...
SC Refuses Legal Lifesaver for Former Trump Chief of Staff (1 comments) ...
Alternate links: Google News | Twitter
Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
"While the exact details of the proposed review board were unclear -- including who would serve as the arbiters of a general's leadership, though they would be appointed directly by the White House and would be veterans --
the senior uniformed military community immediately responded with concern that their commitment to avoiding politics would not be able to hold.
"The military is run by civilians, but the politics are supposed to stay outside," one currently serving Army lieutenant general told Military.com.
"It could be very hard to do our job if we have to constantly be making sure we're appeasing someone on a political or partisan level."
'
"The creation of a separate review process reporting directly to Trump that is outside of the existing job performance system could impose a chilling loyalty test --
not to the Constitution or military code, but to a president known for prioritizing personal loyalty, currently serving generals and defense officials interviewed say."
#1 | Posted by Corky at 2024-11-13 06:19 PM | Reply
Nobody owes that fat sack of ---- Trump anything.
#2 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2024-11-13 07:01 PM | Reply
This is a terrible move.
The Generals will switch to state guards if we're lucky.
If we're not they'll serve other countries unless America needs them unexpectedly....
#3 | Posted by Tor at 2024-11-13 07:20 PM | Reply
Switching to a National Guard position is highly unlikely. Flag rank is rare and tends to come up through the ranks within the state. I've never served under an AG (adjutant general) that came from the active duty except for a few that went to West Point went to the N.G. after active service, coming in no higher than a Captain. I would expect several will take their retirement, security clearance and head for corporate merica.
#4 | Posted by mattm at 2024-11-13 07:46 PM | Reply
Maybe a minor detail Tor, but N.G. rank has to be conferred by the Pentagon. I waited two years after the state approved the promotion to go from Major to LTC.
#5 | Posted by mattm at 2024-11-13 07:49 PM | Reply
Most governors would love to have generals running their guard.
#6 | Posted by Tor at 2024-11-13 07:49 PM | Reply
Every Governor has a general running the State National Guard, Adjutant General. en.wikipedia.org
Scroll down a ways to see the list, they are two-star generals, a member of their states National Guard, can be Army or Air Force.
#7 | Posted by mattm at 2024-11-13 09:01 PM | Reply
Remember Tuberville's adventure in holding up military promotions? That affected the reserves and guard as well.
#8 | Posted by mattm at 2024-11-13 09:04 PM | Reply
I waited two years after the state approved the promotion to go from Major to LTC.
#5 | Posted by mattm
Well shizz man.
#9 | Posted by jpw at 2024-11-14 02:50 AM | Reply
This is a good way to ensure a military coup should a Democrat get elected.
#10 | Posted by Sycophant at 2024-11-14 11:00 AM | Reply
Here are some statistics on sexual assault in the U.S. military: 2023 prevalence The prevalence of sexual assault in the military decreased in 2023 compared to 2021: Women: The rate of unwanted sexual contact for active duty women decreased from 8.4% in 2021 to 6.8% in 2023. Men: The rate of unwanted sexual contact for active duty men decreased from 1.5% in 2021 to 1.3% in 2023, but this change was not statistically significant. Total reports: The Department of Defense received 8,515 reports of sexual assault in 2023, which is a decrease from 8,942 in 2022
"""""""""""""""""""""""WOKE""""""""""""""""""""""" Military
#11 | Posted by truthhurts at 2024-11-14 11:19 AM | Reply
The US military has faced and continues to face racial discrimination and other challenges, including: Racial discrimination in the ranks A 2017 survey found that many service members reported racial discrimination or harassment, including 31.2% of Black/African American service members, 23.3% of Asian American troops, and 21% of Hispanic troops. Disparities in military justice Black and Hispanic service members are disproportionately investigated and court-martialed. For example, Black sailors are 40% more likely to be referred to court-martial than white sailors in the Navy, and Black soldiers are 61% more likely in the Army. Racial disparities in the military death penalty A study found that the race of the accused and victim influenced charging and sentencing decisions in death-penalty cases. Lack of diversity in military service academies The student population at the academies doesn't reflect the diversity of the rest of the nation. In 2021, non-white cadets accounted for between 36% and 40% of the military service academies' student body. Structural racism Some say the military needs to do more to address structural racism, including adding questions to climate surveys that explicitly ask about racism
""""""""""""""""WOKE"""""""""""" Military
#12 | Posted by truthhurts at 2024-11-14 11:20 AM | Reply
No one stop Trump from nuking a country...or hurricane...
#13 | Posted by Sycophant at 2024-11-14 04:27 PM | Reply
Post a comment The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed. Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it. Username: Password: Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2024 World Readable
The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2024 World Readable