DOGE Is Trying to Gift Itself a $500 Million Building

Doesn't the US Government already own the building? Not sure why they need a transfer to allow GSA, which is the Government Services administration to take it over.
But anyway this is not DOGE forcing the building owner to give their building to the US government.

#12 Assessor's data base says it has been owned by the US Government.

Let's see the original deed and any subsequent titles then.

#15 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-04-02 11:40 AM | Reply | Flag:
(Choose)

Sure, look it up and let us know. Thanks

#15 And if the USIP is a congressionally funded think tank then where would the funds come from for them to own a building?

"look it up"

That's what you said you did.
Share the link.

#19 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-04-02 12:10 PM | Reply | Flag:

The Washington DC assessors office database, but the site does not show sales history or copies of deeds, it shows assessed value and ownership.

Boaz bought his house with funds from the government, so the government can take his house.

#22 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-04-02 12:25 PM | Reply | Flag:
(Choose)

That was a loan that I assumed he paid back.

#28 www.wired.com
So if a judge allowed the transfer today the owner wouldn't be listed in the DC assessor's office as the US Government. I'm assuming the building was always owned by the US Government and USIOP was a tenant. When USIOP lost their funding GSA would take it over vs leaving it vacant.
As for Boaz, he had a job and got paid to do the job. So based on your argument if you worked for the government and bought a house the government owns that house?

"I'm assuming the building was always owned by the US Government"

Why? USIOP is not part of the government. Why would they be in a government building?

#30 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-04-02 01:58 PM | Reply | Flag:
(Choose)

Because the US Government is listed as the owner of the building.

#34 Government Services Admin is going there, not DOGE.

"The building was transferred to the federal government General Services Administration in March 2025."

That's what I was looking for. Where did that come from? I couldn't find it on line.

Try googling that sentence, Einstein.

Christ you are a stupid son of a bitch.

#38 | POSTED BY SNOOFY AT 2025-04-02 02:24 PM | FLAG: | NEWSWORTHY 1

I googled it Einstein. No where does it say they owned the building and DOGE came in and gave it to the US Government. It says GSA is moving into it. It also said it couldn't be blocked by a judge who made the decision today. If he made the decision today the assessor's ownership data wouldn't change the same day.

So stupid son of a bitch, you can keep spouting stupid head lines written for morons like you like this one. And btw, Biden wasn't sharp as a tack.

Hey Fishpaw.

You're my bitch.

#47 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-04-02 05:29 PM | Reply | Flag:

"But the judge said, like in the previous hearing, the group still hasn't proven that they are fully independent from the executive branch, and therefore she could not put a stop to any further transfers of assets."

But you have been telling us they are this group of peaceful peacemakers not associated with the Government having their building stolen from them.