Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Saturday, June 21, 2025

According to a report from the Washington Post, the purging of employees at Social Security along with a change in how the agency does business by DOGE has resulted in "website crashes, overloaded servers and long lines at field offices" due to cost-cutting.

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

Social Security has stopped publicly reporting its processing times for benefits, the 1-800 number's current call wait time and numerous other performance metrics, which customers and advocates have used to track the agency's struggling customer service programs.[image or embed]

" The Washington Post (@washingtonpost.com) Jun 20, 2025 at 8:18 PM

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Wake me up when the deposits are late.

#1 | Posted by twinkhunter at 2025-06-21 02:30 PM | Reply

Wake me up when the deposits are late.

#1 | Posted by twinkhunter
>
That you are ever really awake is quesionable.

#2 | Posted by Zed at 2025-06-21 02:48 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Not surprising that a drug-addled egomaniac working on behalf of a mentally ill egomaniac would screw something up.

The stories are going to be endless.

#3 | Posted by Zed at 2025-06-21 02:49 PM | Reply

Intentionally.

In six months to a year, they'll be pointing to how broken it is as justification for killing it.

#4 | Posted by jpw at 2025-06-21 03:21 PM | Reply

Wake me up when the deposits are late.

#1 | Posted by twinkhunter at 2025-06-21 02:30 PM

While my wife's SS deposits are still coming on the same day as they have for years, for the last few months, my SS deposit has been coming two or three days early. I've been retired for nearly 10 years, and the deposit was always made on the fourth Wednesday of the month, until these past few months. Since my deposit goes into my savings account at my credit union, while my wife's goes into the household checking account at our bank, it might be some change in how the credit union is processing the deposits. Anyway, it seems a bit odd.

OCU

#5 | Posted by OCUser at 2025-06-21 03:36 PM | Reply

Cutting all social programs wouldn't make a dent in the deficit. Closing military installations and cutting military budgets would. Bring troops home to defend the border. Sell off military assets or donate them to police and fire departments. Leave grandma's pension alone.

#6 | Posted by lee_the_agent at 2025-06-21 03:37 PM | Reply

#6: This is an excellent book about the US military-industrial complex that Ike warned us about in his 17 Jan 1961 farewell address: img.stevensbooks.com

#7 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-06-21 03:52 PM | Reply

When I applied for Medicare, I thought two months was plenty of time. Boy, was I wrong. I went to sign up, and they asked me a few identifying questions about what car I'd had, what address I'd lived...the average stuff.

But after a few "none of these are me" answers, the system shut me out. I'd have to contact my local SS office.

When I did, I was told the next available phone appointment was 3.5 months away, almost 6 weeks after my eligibility. I ended up having to extend COBRA for three months, just to insure coverage.

And the m-effers actually had the gall to charge me for the month and a half I wasn't covered!

For SS, I logged in BEFORE I could apply, and filled out almost all of the application before getting a suspension/return number. Then, the first day I COULD apply, I did.

I've already received confirming paperwork, and will get my first SS check this October.

#8 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-06-21 03:55 PM | Reply

I mean, if the Repubican Party doesn't want Social Security to survive, let them take ALL registered Repubicans and Independents off of Social Security. Leave the rest of us alone ... I've paid into it since I was 13, if you don't want it, MRGA maroons, then don't take it.

#9 | Posted by chuffy at 2025-06-21 03:57 PM | Reply

#9: I mean, if the Repubican Party doesn't want Social Security to survive, let them take ALL registered Repubicans and Independents off of Social Security. Leave the rest of us alone ... I've paid into it since I was 13, if you don't want it, MRGA maroons, then don't take it.

And Libertarians.

#10 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-06-21 04:00 PM | Reply

I'm surprised #1 was able to type after jziing all over their keyboard at this news

#11 | Posted by hamburglar at 2025-06-21 04:06 PM | Reply

No one is bothering Social Security you ------- idiots.

Just like no one has bothered Medicaid.

The only ones who wont, and shouldnt get medicaid are illegals and that should have been done long ago.

#12 | Posted by boaz at 2025-06-21 04:21 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

They are most certaintly aiming to destroy Social Secruity as evidenced by their words and actions. Read the article. Also, less than 1% of Medicaid spending goes to undocumented immigrants. Those who do receive some kind of Medicaid spending get it for humanitarian reasons (e.g., giving birth) www.pbs.org

#13 | Posted by hamburglar at 2025-06-21 04:28 PM | Reply

#12
Sir:
Your Social Security information is under review and requires immediate updating. Please forward it and your relevant banking details to me immediately.
Thanks for helping Make America Great Again Again.
~ Big Bawlz

#14 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2025-06-21 04:29 PM | Reply

No ... . I'm pretty sure it was the boomers raiding the lockbox back during the Clinton/W era that crippled it if we are all being honest with ourselves Rcade ...

#15 | Posted by Bluewaffles at 2025-06-21 04:42 PM | Reply

"Just like no one has bothered Medicaid."

Are you blind? They've just committed to $850 billion in reduced spending...and there are only two places to get it: Medicaid, or the Defense Budget, which they've pledged to INCREASE.

Show us how $800 billion is reduced WITHOUT touching Medicaid.
www.cbo.gov

#16 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-06-21 04:46 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"The only ones who wont, and shouldn't get medicaid are illegals"

That's not true at all. There will be thousands of folks due Medicaid, who will encounter A LOT more red tape. Some will be forced to forego treatment or rehabilitation due to job requirements. Others will be denied benefits, if for no other reason than the town's main employer is laying off, not hiring.

And if rural hospitals close, folks will have to bear a much higher burden (travel and lodging) to get care.

#17 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-06-21 04:51 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

" the boomers raiding the lockbox back during the Clinton/W era"

Give credit where credit is due:

Bill Clinton handed off true surplus budgets (i.e., the overcollections of SS at the time weren't counted) to Dubya and Cheney, who changed the budget from surpluses as far as the eye could see, to (at that time) the largest deficits known to man, before handing off a dumpster fire of an economy.

Ultimately, Dubya and Cheney reset America's fiscal sights from Surplusville to Debtsylvania. And Republicans since then have either filibustered attempts to increase taxes, or actively written codes which borrow additional trillions, mostly to give away in tax cuts for the world's wealthiest 1%.

Republicans deserve ALL the credit.

#18 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-06-21 04:59 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"Wake me up when the deposits are late."

You're joking, right?

One of the HUGE advantages of Social Security is we can see the future quite easily. For example, we knew when Reagan changed the withholding rates, that meant we'd be over-collecting Social Security taxes until around 2010, when we'd have to start dipping into the reserves. We saw that coming decades in advance, just like we saw the baby boomer retirement coming for decades. We're currently in the 11th year of a 17 year stretch where 10,000 baby boomers a day turn 65. We can see actuarial shortfalls within a dozen years, especially if we don't address the imbalance in the equation.

Currently, 1 additional point for both the employer and the worker would put the Social Security equation in balance into actuarial perpetuity (75 yrs). There are other possibilities as well, including slowly raising the retirement age. Any significant wait before enacting reforms will force the changes to become more drastic.

#19 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-06-21 05:32 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort