Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Friday, May 23, 2025

Republicans want to investigate former President Joe Biden's use of the autopen. Did he personally grant broad (and possibly unconstitutional) pardons for family members, members of the January 6 Committee and Anthony Fauci, or did someone else make the decision? Was he responsible for all the executive orders issued under his name, or did White House personnel make those decisions? If he did not personally sign various documents, are they valid?

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Who was really running the show while Biden was president?

Pretty sure we concluded that it was BellRinger when he asked this last time.

You guys sure like to spend a lot of time talking about Biden. Wonder what you'll fixate on when he kicks the bucket. Definitely won't be Trump breaking the law and spitting on the Constitution.

#1 | Posted by censored at 2025-05-23 05:41 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

It wasn't the fascist traitors of Project 2025, that's for sure

#2 | Posted by hamburglar at 2025-05-23 05:43 PM | Reply

Autopens have been used for a number of years without question. You MAGA Trumpers are grasping for straws at this point.

#3 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-05-23 05:52 PM | Reply

Is Biden dead yet?

#4 | Posted by fortfisher at 2025-05-23 06:16 PM | Reply

Well Censored, now that the cat has been let out of the bag by Democrats that no one was home upstairs with him and other people were signing off using his signature without his authority. That's a felony and jail time is warranted. The people deserve to know the truth.

As for you Laura, sorry the T's are about to lose their Medicaid funding on peepee chopping surgery. Hope everyone has a nice Memorial Day weekend.

#5 | Posted by Bluewaffles at 2025-05-23 06:48 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

Hilarious!

With Dear Orange Leader destroying everything from the economy to healthcare to the Western Alliance and Ukraine, Trump's Humpers want talk about Biden! What a great distraction, erm, I mean idea.

#6 | Posted by Corky at 2025-05-23 08:19 PM | Reply

Well Censored, now that the cat has been let out of the bag by Democrats that no one was home upstairs with him and other people were signing off using his signature without his authority. That's a felony and jail time is warranted. The people deserve to know the truth.
#5 | Posted by Bluewaffles

That's a lot of (groundless) assumptions your making, but you already know that.

We'll get on those false accusations right after we take care of the folks who were legit signing off on "Alzheimer's" Ron Reagan's papers during his second term. You remember Ronnie, right? The guy who got in front of Congress and said he didn't recall telling Ollie North to commit 16 felonies and Congress believed him. "124 times in his eight hours of testimony." seattletimes.com

I'm sure you got your panties in a bunch over that as well. Because the senility of our presidents is such a big deal to you.

#7 | Posted by censored at 2025-05-23 08:22 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

They say Eisenhower was largely diminished due to a stroke in his last eighteen months. Then in his Farewell Address, he gave a warning totally unheeded over the last 60 years: the military-industrial complex speech. Not bad for the conservative-imagined "brain dead."

avalon.law.yale.edu

#8 | Posted by Dbt2 at 2025-05-23 10:44 PM | Reply

Censored I have no doubt that Ronnie couldn't remember telling Ollie to go commit 16 felonies. I mean the guy did have early Alzheimer's during the later part of his second term in office for Christs sake.

That still doesn't excuse what was going on with full blown whatever the ---- Biden has lol.

#9 | Posted by Bluewaffles at 2025-05-23 11:48 PM | Reply


With Dear Orange Leader destroying everything from the economy to healthcare to the Western Alliance and Ukraine, Trump's Humpers want talk about Biden! What a great distraction, erm, I mean idea.

#6 | POSTED BY CORKY

Classic Whataboutism.

#10 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-05-24 12:10 AM | Reply

Autopens have been used for a number of years without question. You MAGA Trumpers are grasping for straws at this point.

What is the legal process? Anyone?

How does the use of autopen get authorized?

All we know is there aren't any laws governing a president's use of an autopen. A DOJ memo said the president doesn't have to physically sign a bill for it to become law.

THATS IT

Is that legal according to SCOTUS? idk, but it wouldn't apply to pardons right?

The country is a mess, and Biden kicked hornets nest.

#11 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-05-24 12:13 AM | Reply

but it wouldn't apply to pardons right?

So it's still all about Hunter Biden. LOL. Petty, petty people.

#12 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-05-24 12:35 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

" it wouldn't apply to pardons right?"

Gosh darn it ... that was the ONE pardon done in longhand!

#13 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-05-24 12:39 AM | Reply | Funny: 1

They are still trying to nail Obama. If Biden wasn't Obama's VP nobody would give a damn. The rotten bastards

#14 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-05-24 12:43 AM | Reply

They are still trying to nail Obama.

They're just blowing a smokescreen for Lewzer's pathetic, frankly embarrassing, "performance".

#15 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-05-24 12:51 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 3

Censored I have no doubt that Ronnie couldn't remember telling Ollie to go commit 16 felonies. I mean the guy did have early Alzheimer's during the later part of his second term in office for Christs sake. That still doesn't excuse what was going on with full blown whatever the [fudge] Biden has lol.
#9 | Posted by Bluewaffles

OK, but does your false accusation against Biden excuse "whatever the [fudge] [Trump] has lol?"

Which is the entire purpose of your post, right? Ignore the ravings of our current president, which is very much a concern, by bringing up baseless garbage about our former president?

Drudge-Report-Dementia-Don

#16 | Posted by censored at 2025-05-24 06:35 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Whomever it was we need em back.

The new guy has gone insane and is destroying the country like Wreck-It Ralph.

#17 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-05-24 08:05 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Ronald Reagan claimed that the Russian language had no word for "freedom." (The word is "svoboda"; it's quite well attested in Russian literature.) Ronald Reagan said that intercontinental ballistic missiles (not that there are any non-ballistic missiles"a corruption of language that isn't his fault) could be recalled once launched. Ronald Reagan said that he sought a "Star Wars" defense only in order to share the technology with the tyrants of the U.S.S.R. Ronald Reagan professed to be annoyed when people called it "Star Wars," even though he had ended his speech on the subject with the lame quip, "May the force be with you." Ronald Reagan used to alarm his Soviet counterparts by saying that surely they'd both unite against an invasion from Mars. Ronald Reagan used to alarm other constituencies by speaking freely about the "End Times" foreshadowed in the Bible. In the Oval Office, Ronald Reagan told Yitzhak Shamir and Simon Wiesenthal, on two separate occasions, that he himself had assisted personally at the liberation of the Nazi death camps.

There was more to Ronald Reagan than that. Reagan announced that apartheid South Africa had "stood beside us in every war we've ever fought," when the South African leadership had been on the other side in the most recent world war. Reagan allowed Alexander Haig to greenlight the Israeli invasion of Lebanon in 1982, fired him when that went too far and led to mayhem in Beirut, then ran away from Lebanon altogether when the Marine barracks were bombed, and then unbelievably accused Tip O'Neill and the Democrats of "scuttling." Reagan sold heavy weapons to the Iranian mullahs and lied about it, saying that all the weapons he hadn't sold them (and hadn't traded for hostages in any case) would, all the same, have fit on a small truck. Reagan then diverted the profits of this criminal trade to an illegal war in Nicaragua and lied unceasingly about that, too. Reagan then modestly let his underlings maintain that he was too dense to understand the connection between the two impeachable crimes. He then switched without any apparent strain to a policy of backing Saddam Hussein against Iran. (If Margaret Thatcher's intelligence services had not bugged Oliver North in London and become infuriated because all European nations were boycotting Iran at Reagan's request, we might still not know about this.)

slate.com

#18 | Posted by lee_the_agent at 2025-05-24 08:15 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 3

#18: And the 1983 invasion to stop the "Red Menace" in Grenada (against the wishes of NATO ally Margaret "Take a Hatchet to the Unions" Thatcher: images.greelane.com

#19 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-05-24 08:25 AM | Reply

This was Woodrow Wilson 2.0 and apparently it looks like almost the entirety of those on the left think it was really cool.

#20 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-05-24 09:27 AM | Reply

This was Woodrow Wilson 2.0 and apparently it looks like almost the entirety of those on the left think it was really cool.

Posted by BellRinger at 2025-05-24 09:27 AM | Reply

Go away. We're full up on your balderdash Jeff. You lack ANY proof of what you're espousing.

#21 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-05-24 09:42 AM | Reply


So it's still all about Hunter Biden. LOL. Petty, petty people.
#12 | POSTED BY REDIAL

No, its about the law, or lawlessness. Lumpers talk continually about the "eroding of the law under Trump", but this is actually worse, who was running the autopen for everything Biden "autopened"? OR any President for that matter? If there is no chain of custody on how the autopen signing is documented anyone can sign a presidential order/pardon/law.

But now conveniently Lumpers don't care because of things might not go their way?

What if it was Hunter Biden that autopenned his pardon, does that matter to you Canadians?


Gosh darn it ... that was the ONE pardon done in longhand!
#13 | POSTED BY DANFORTH

Was it? If so then clearly I am not taking about Hunter Just the pardons in general. I would even submit laws shouldn't be allowed to be autopenned without some chain of custody.

Or to be more blunt the autopen without chain of custody will allow the ability to create puppet Presidents. Run by someone other than what the people vote for.
Its all fun and games until your side is the victim of some behind the scenes authoritarian.

#22 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-05-24 10:31 AM | Reply

Lefties are fleeing.

#23 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-05-25 02:34 AM | Reply

Learned a new term, I didn't know about Russia under the Soviet Union.

Politburo, thats what the US had under Biden, a Politburo.


Lefties are fleeing.
#23 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Only the unprincipled Lefties .. aka Lumpers!

#24 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-05-25 08:25 AM | Reply

Lefties are fleeing.

This patricidal --------- fled from his username.

#25 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-05-25 08:28 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Lefties are fleeing.
#23 | Posted by BellRinger

What is there to flee? This nonsense, baseless post on an irrelevant matter intended to distract us from yet another issue that makes Trump unsuitable for currently holding office?

(In case you missed it the first time):
Drudge-Report-Dementia-Don

#26 | Posted by censored at 2025-05-25 08:40 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

" post on an irrelevant matter"

Irrelevant?

Wow. Just, wow.

#27 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-05-25 10:53 AM | Reply | Funny: 1

Jeff just go away. We're full up on dishonesty.

#28 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-05-25 11:04 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Irrelevant?
#27 | Posted by BellRinger

Yes, false allegations on Biden's dementia is not a concern, as seen by your utter lack of interest in the real dementia presented by the current office holder.

See also:
MAGAt freakout on bogus claim of Biden getting money from Ukraine.

vs.

MAGAt crickets when Trump gets $400 million bribe, in blatant violation of the Constitution, from the Arabs sponsoring Hamas.

#29 | Posted by censored at 2025-05-25 11:19 AM | Reply

"Irrelevant?"

Well, as relevant as a debate on Reagan's last years.

Meanwhile, where are your threads on corruption, bribery, censorship, and lawfare? They're all out there, right in the open.

Have these issues ceased to matter, or is there another (R)eason?

#30 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-05-25 11:20 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

" false allegations on Biden's dementia is"

Now you are just trolling.

Danforth,

Feel free to create any thread you want on those topics.

#31 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-05-25 12:08 PM | Reply

Back in 2023, Charles Cooke wrote:

" President or not, Biden is a decrepit, dishonest, unpleasant blowhard. He's a nasty, corrupt, partisan fraud. He is, as Shakespeare had it, "a most notable coward, an infinite and endless liar, an hourly promise breaker, the owner of no one good quality." Biden is twice as irritating as he believes himself to be, and half as intelligent into the bargain. From the moment he arrived on the scene " nearly 50 years ago, Lord help us " he has represented all that is wrong with our politics. A century hence, his name will be set into aspic and memorialized under "Hack.""

#32 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-05-25 12:17 PM | Reply

"Feel free to create any thread you want on those topics."

When did they stop being important issues to you?

When Biden was president, you couldn't stop screeching about censorship you couldn't identify, lawfare you couldn't specify, presidential corruption you couldn't find, and presidential offspring profiting off his dad's influence.

Now, all those actions are out in the open. I could also add Presidential EOs, which you used to hate, profligate deficit spending, and violating the constitution, which you used to be against.

Any (R)ationale?

#33 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-05-25 12:18 PM | Reply

Create a thread, or 3, Mr Lazy. And quit acting like you actually care about any of the issues you are lamely trying to raised because you've oft demonstrated that you don't. Because it's (D)ifferent when your heroes are doing it.

#34 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-05-25 12:48 PM | Reply

"Feel free to create any thread you want on those topics."

There have already been quite a few, between the plane bribe, the crypto coin grift, the Harvard lawfare, "HabeusCorpus doesn't matter", and rambling mutterings of an old man at public events.

#35 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-05-25 01:20 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

It'll be interesting how quickly this crew will want to move on from Trump when he's out of office? I'm sure the general attitude of the left will be "Trump isn't in office anymore, whatever he did illegal doesn't matter, let's move on"

"Trump wasn't in office, when this was auto-penned? So what, he's not in office anymore, what does it matter who signed it!"

puh-lease.

It will matter then, and should matter now.

#36 | Posted by kwrx25 at 2025-05-25 01:48 PM | Reply

"It will matter then"

Not to Republicans.

Just look how every one has decided none of the Biden issues are important any more, because Trump

#37 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-05-25 01:56 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

" false allegations on Biden's dementia is"
Now you are just trolling.
#31 | Posted by BellRinger

Says the Trollmaster General. Still got nothing to say about Trump, but plenty of faux-indignation for Joe. Keep effing that chicken.

#38 | Posted by censored at 2025-05-25 03:04 PM | Reply

"Who was really running the show while Biden was president?"

I don't see a crime here, what's the actual concern?

#39 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-25 03:05 PM | Reply

"I'm sure the general attitude of the left will be "Trump isn't in office anymore, whatever he did illegal doesn't matter, let's move on""

There's a crucial difference. In your fever to be a victim of Biden, you have overlooked the difference.
You're claiming that Biden wasn't really running the country? But that isn't illegal.

#40 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-25 03:31 PM | Reply

" It'll be interesting how quickly this crew will want to move on from Trump when he's out of office?"

Second impeachment. J6 committee ... ..

#41 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-05-25 10:16 PM | Reply

Second impeachment. J6 committee ... ..

Posted by BellRinger at 2025-05-25 10:16 PM | Reply

So you really DO support the insurrection ehhhhhh Jeff?? Not surprised by that though sadly.

#42 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-05-25 10:19 PM | Reply

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA I KNEW IT

I knew this was going to be one of my favorite threads ever from people who think biden was in charge to bringing Obama into it
--------
this was a fun read.

wait....you leftists were joking....right ?
I wouldn't use this thread as an ad for more traffic.

#43 | Posted by shrimptacodan at 2025-05-25 10:19 PM | Reply

#42. The point flew over your head. Not surprised.

#44 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-05-25 10:24 PM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort