Supreme Court Asked to Overturn Gay Marriage

Wednesday, August 13, 2025

Kim Davis, the former Kentucky county clerk who was jailed for six days in 2015 after refusing to issue marriage licenses to a gay couple on religious grounds, is appealing a $100,000 jury verdict for emotional damages plus $260,000 for attorneys fees.

Posted by snoofy at 09:31 AM | 10 COMMENTS | permalink | Comment on This Entry |

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

All the Ways the Right Wing Is Trying to End Gay Marriage in 2025

[image or embed]
-- Teddy Wilson (@reportbywilson.bsky.social) Aug 12, 2025 at 12:47 PM

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Rotten little bitty. She's as worthless as they come.

#1 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-08-11 06:48 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Lol, the sanctity of marriage snatch is a pass around whore. Married four times to three different men. Two kids with husband #1. Twins with husband #3 while still married to #1. Then married #2, divorced him and married #3, divorced him and last I read is married again to #2. Who knew there were that many men with low self esteem and bad eyesight in her family. Gay couples should file a class action against her for cheapening the sanctity of their marriages.

#2 | Posted by _Gunslinger_ at 2025-08-12 10:56 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Clarence Thomas's Most Terrifying Wish Is About to Come True
www.yahoo.com

... Staver's argument alluded to Justice Clarence Thomas's concurring opinion in Dobbs, which overturned the nationwide right to abortion established in Roe v. Wade.

In his 2022 opinion, Thomas argued that the court "should reconsider" its substantive due process precedents, including contraception, same-sex marriage, and even same-sex relationships. ...

#3 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-08-12 11:07 PM | Reply

@#3 ... Thomas argued that the court "should reconsider" its substantive due process precedents, ...

OK, my first question ... is Justice's Thomas comment even something that a Supreme Court Justice should raise?

#4 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-08-12 11:09 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

I sure the hell hope this doesn't happen.

It would be very unfortunate.

#5 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-08-13 10:20 AM | Reply

"I sure the hell hope this doesn't happen."

You should have thought of that BEFORE you voted for it you dumbass Fake Plastic Christian.

So just sit back and enjoy your FAFO.

#6 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-08-13 10:59 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 3

I doubt the court will agree to hear this case.

#7 | Posted by eberly at 2025-08-13 11:18 AM | Reply

LOL. I see what you did there!

#8 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-08-13 11:21 AM | Reply

Good!

"Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard."
-H. L. Mencken

#9 | Posted by censored at 2025-08-13 02:06 PM | Reply

You know what bill? ---- you!

You only care because this impacts your sensibilities. Who cares about trans people or immigrants ---- them. But oh noes!!! Thus is going to impact people I care about

You are a soulless sociopathic hypocrite

#10 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-08-13 02:19 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1