Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Sunday, May 03, 2026

On May 2, 2026, James Talarico gave a commencement address titled, "Unshakeable Things: Gen Z and the New Great Awakening" at Paul Quinn College, the oldest HBCU in Texas.

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

New poll shows James Talarico beating both Cornyn and Paxton

[image or embed]

-- Team Talarico (@teamtalaricohq.bsky.social) Apr 28, 2026 at 8:43 PM

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

"Before I was a politician, I was a public school teacher. I taught sixth grade language arts at Roads Middle School on the west side of San Antonio. I often say teaching middle school is the best preparation for politics.

The west side of San Antonio is a beautiful historic neighborhood. It's also one of the poorest zip codes in the entire state of Texas. a neighborhood not unlike Highland Hills.

My students weren't just kids. They were survivors,
dreamers, fighters. I saw it in their eyes. Something unyielding,
something unshakable.

I see the same thing in your eyes. As a former teacher, I am so proud of each
and every one of you. And I am so and I am so honored to be here at Paul
Quinn College.

Paul Quinn was not started by politicians.
It was built by black preachers holding classes in church basement and living rooms just 7 years after emancipation came to Texas. For 154 years, Quinites have been guided by a deep moral commitment to all of God's children,
regardless of their skin color or their zip code.

This place has spiritual roots. This place is rooted in faith, in service, and in love.

Today I want to invite all of you to live out of those roots."

;;

"You may not believe that a world rooted in faith, service, and love is possible.

In your short lives, you've seen a pandemic and an insurrection,
natural disasters, and artificial intelligence, mass shootings, and mass deportations, all piped through your screen into your souls."

You've grown up in an economy that isn't built for you. The American dream is on life support.

90% of baby boomers went on to earn more money than their parents. For
millennials like me, it's 50%. And for Gen Z, it's even lower. And we know that
black Texans have 10 times less wealth and are half as likely to own a home."

This current cost of living crisis is the culmination of 50 years of trickle down economics.

50 years of the top 1% rigging this economic system and this political system for their own benefit at our expense.

Young people, young people can't afford to buy a home, but Jeff Bezos has 12.

Young people can't afford to fill up their gas tank, but Mark Zuckerberg is launching helicopters from his mega yacht. Young people pay more than their fair share of income taxes. But someone like Elon Musk can get away without paying a penny."

(Excerpts from the speech.)

Here's an article covering the event:

""Disillusionment has a bad reputation," he told the 2026 graduating class of Paul Quinn College in remarks obtained exclusively ahead of time by MS NOW.

"But being disillusioned means being freed from illusions " to see reality. To know the truth. As painful as it may be, your disillusionment is a superpower.

You can see the world as it is and dream of the way it ought to be."

www.ms.now

But the speech is worth a full listen.

#1 | Posted by Corky at 2026-05-03 10:53 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"Young people, young people can't afford to buy a home, but Jeff Bezos has 12."

Thanks for posting, Corky.

Can't wait to see US Senator James Talarico's (D-TX) first meeting with NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani (D).

That would take place if Mayor Mamdani has business in Wash DC next year, so it's remote, but not impossible.

Sidenote: Two of the greatest martial artists of the 1960s and 70s never met: Muhammad Ali and Bruce Lee.

#2 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-05-03 11:11 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#2 Then they'll both be members of the DNC.

#3 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-03 11:45 AM | Reply

At least the first 10 mins of this is a British view of politics and religion in America, including references to the book, "Jesus and John Wayne"... which is now one of my fav book titles :)

www.youtube.com

(you'll need to rewind to start; the rest covers more than most Christians know about what their religion really teaches)

#4 | Posted by Corky at 2026-05-03 01:25 PM | Reply

Can't wait to see US Senator James Talarico's (D-TX) first meeting with NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani (D).

#2 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-05-03 11:11 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

I thought you weren't backing candidates that take money from Israeli's.

#5 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-05-03 05:18 PM | Reply

Based on campaign records and his own statements, Texas State Representative and 2026 U.S. Senate candidate James Talarico has not accepted any direct contributions from AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee) or its PACs.

#6 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-05-03 07:45 PM | Reply

#6 ...


#7 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-03 08:27 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

Based on campaign records and his own statements, Texas State Representative and 2026 U.S. Senate candidate James Talarico has not accepted any direct contributions from AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee) or its PACs.

#6 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-05-03 07:45 PM | Reply | Flag:

His largest donation is from Miriam Adelson.

#8 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-05-03 10:13 PM | Reply

Talarico has faced criticism for accepting money from the Texas Sands PAC, funded by GOP donor Miriam Adelson, which is unrelated to AIPAC.

#9 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-05-04 01:58 AM | Reply

Hi Clownshack:

Thanks for this critical info about young James Talarico (D).

I was blocked from a certain website, but nevertheless I was able to extract this bit of data from them:

"Texas Sands PAC, a Texas Committee, has $5,807,963 in cash on hand.
The PAC has received a total of $9,122,500 in contributions.
Total expenditures for Texas Sands PAC amount to $3,730,790.
The largest contributor to Texas Sands PAC is Dr. Miriam Adelson, who contributed $9,100,000.
Las Vegas Sands Corporation contributed $22,500 to Texas Sands PAC.
John R. Huffman is the largest payee, receiving $1,200,000 in expenditures from the PAC.
Ragnar Research Partners LLC received $291,400 in expenditures from the PAC.
There is no loan data available for Texas Sands PAC."

Two adages now come to mind after reading your comments:

1) "Follow the money"; 2) "Beware of wolves in sheep's clothing."

#10 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-05-04 02:37 AM | Reply

Talarico has faced criticism for accepting money from the Texas Sands PAC, funded by GOP donor Miriam Adelson, which is unrelated to AIPAC.

#9 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-05-04 01:58 AM | Reply | Flag:

I never said AIPAC, you did.

#11 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-05-04 10:29 AM | Reply

"Talarico has defended the contributions, stating he supports the legalization of casinos for job creation and tax revenue, and that he refuses to "unilaterally disarm" while Republicans use similar funding sources." TX news source

This was in 2024 during his first campaign; he faced the same problem most Dems do since Citizens United made Money=Speech and bestowed Corporate Personhood.

He's still miles above his opponents in every important way.

It's kinda like voting for the Green Party Candidate rather than the Dem Pres candidate; making the 'perfect' loser a better choice than the 'imperfect' candidate who can win... and is a saint compared to the Republican.

#12 | Posted by Corky at 2026-05-04 11:25 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

pretty words....FACT.....this creepy little dweeb is a baby killing advocate of

------- mutilation for minors / has said he's okay with men in girls locker/ bathrooms

AND fought to keep pornographic material in school libraries...YES the same as other

cases where concerned parents were prohibited from reading aloud the excerpts from

same books because it was considered improper language and content for a public meeting

NOW I KNOW YOU FREAKS DONT CARE ABOUT THAT..,but normal and GOOD PARENTS DO..

he's a ---- lunatic and the all out assault on him politically, personally and professionally

is about to get really going...after the winner of the senate race is decided

in the run off.

#13 | Posted by shrimptacodan at 2026-05-04 03:20 PM | Reply

#13
Speaking of "a ----" [farting?] lunatic ... "

#14 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2026-05-04 03:25 PM | Reply

POSTED BY SHRIMPsick

Keep voting for your fellow pedophiles.

#15 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-05-04 03:27 PM | Reply

#12 " ... kinda like voting for the Green Party Candidate rather than the Dem Pres candidate; making the 'perfect' loser a better choice than the 'imperfect' candidate who can win... and is a saint compared to the Republican."

Thank you, Corky.

What is it with these internecine warriors and their determination to absolutely destroy the only viable alternative to Trump/Republicans/MAGA ... The Democratic Party.

Theirs is the logic from the Vietnam War era: We had to destroy the village in order to save it.

#16 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-04 03:27 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

#16 | POSTED BY A_FRIEND

Have some standards, stupid.

Otherwise you'll be no different than republicans voting for whoever has an (R) after their name regardless what their policies are.

Idiots like you want to vote for Tom Steyer, because who cares what his policies are, all that matters is that D!

#17 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-05-04 03:36 PM | Reply

"James Talarico (D-TX) has refused to label Israel's actions as genocide, dismissing the question as a debate "within elite political circles" that distracts "from the immediate goal, which is stopping the human suffering in Gaza." He has also avoided commenting on resolutions to block US military aid, claiming unfamiliarity despite his public focus on the issue. This denialism obscures the reality of Israel's apartheid system, documented by human rights organizations, where Palestinians endure segregated roads, expropriation of land, and systematic oppression to maintain Jewish supremacy.

Talarico's ties to Zionist networks further expose his complicity. In 2019, he attended an AIPAC event alongside major donor Adam Loewy, a Zionist supporter who matched donations to Talarico's campaigns. He has also accepted $59,000 from the Texas Sands PAC, funded by pro-Israel billionaire Miriam Adelson, who bankrolls efforts to expand Zionist influence.

Despite later disavowing AIPAC and pledging not to accept its funds, Talarico's history reveals a pattern of aligning with Zionist donors while feigning moral outrage over Gaza's suffering."

Source:

www.reversecanarymission.org

Many thanks, Clownshack, for alerting me about James Talarico.

Texans will have to decide for themselves.

NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani (D) made decisions much easier for us in the Big Apple.

"Oh, you say Palestinians are being genocided? You'll arrest Benjamin Netanyahu? Sold!"

#18 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-05-04 03:43 PM | Reply

Idiots like you want to vote for Tom Steyer, because who cares what his policies are, all that matters is that D!

#17 | Posted by ClownShack

I honestly feel like the time to try is in the primary. When we hit the general election for POTUS there really are only 2 viable candidates. R or D and if Trump is the R does it really matter who the D is by then if you live in a swing state? Those of us in a state with a foregone conclusion are given the opportunity to vote 3rd party and try to stir things up in future elections but for now there are really no other choices...

#19 | Posted by justagirl_idaho at 2026-05-04 03:46 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

I honestly feel like the time to try is in the primary.

Completely agree.

Which is what makes AFriend spamming threads demanding people vote his way is absurd.

He's no different than his conservative counterparts demanding people vote their way.

Those of us in a state with a foregone conclusion are given the opportunity to vote 3rd party

Which I gladly take full advantage of.

#20 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-05-04 03:53 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Many thanks, Clownshack, for alerting me about James Talarico

My pleasure.

When I first hear young Talarico speak his demeanor was calm and him message was clear. America has been usurped by the wealthy.

People need to work together to reclaim our country and our rights.

#21 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-05-04 03:55 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

But the speech is worth a full listen.

I listened, his pace is uninspiring, it's like he's holding back, trying to mimic Obama's pacing, but he's pushing vacuous political bromide.

I think he's found a niche in the Democrat party with his religious pomposity. I don't think it will play well with the majority of the party, which is extremist.

America has been usurped by the wealthy.

Nah, it's funny you say that's his message when he literally talks about how the system outlines division, then goes onto divide the country by its wealth.

How he's upset people are complaining about mass immigration but also hopes to get your vote to fix an economy that doesn't work for you, its not working because labor is cheap, how does immigrating 9M people the lower middleclass?
The Idaho thread is informative, get rid of the illegal immigrants, would ruin milk companies because they can't pay a fair wage. Do you guys even hear yourselves?

Its like he doesn't understand why the middle class is being destroyed. He's appealing to the propaganda taught to college kids, but they will become unemployed because they don't have the skills to adapt to the changing landscape.
Lumpers want to hold on to the idea of a "college education" but don't realize the world is moving past the "college job mill" education system, its outdated.

#22 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-05-04 04:18 PM | Reply

People need to work together to reclaim our country and our rights.

What rights have changed that you need to "reclaim" Clownshack? Do you feel there are more or fewer regulatory hurdles you have to deal with on a day to day?

I always ask this when people talk like this, and I wonder what it means? Is there something you are unable to do, that you could do in the 60s,70s,80s,90s?

#23 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-05-04 04:22 PM | Reply

Former US Marine Graham Platner (D) in Maine is certainly trying and in 2025 NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani (D) was the first successful counterattack against foreign interference in our elections and the oligarchs.

And NYC is the home to the most Jews outside nuclear-armed Israel, a wealthy country which offers world class universal healthcare for all its residents, like Germany, Canada, Greenland, Cuba, the UK, Taiwan, Iran, tiny Albania, and in 2027, Mexico.

"Argh! Only AIPAC and status quo Democrats should win! Blargh! We must keep sending Israel billions and billions of dollars of American taxpayer money! Who cares about hijab-wearers! Stay asleep in the Matrix! Argh! Purity tests! Pollyannas! Gargh! MIGA!"

#24 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-05-04 04:50 PM | Reply

- Lumpers

Must be Chinese for people who are smarter than him.

- Israel

Making the perfect the enemy of the damn sight better than the other candidate... is really just self-abuse.

Some people who might be vegan also might starve to death in a Deli.

That'll show those carnivores!

#25 | Posted by Corky at 2026-05-04 05:36 PM | Reply

Hi Corky

By Tuesday 5 Nov 2024, the IDF had liquidated an incredible 43,061 Palestinians; 101,000 were wounded or maimed, all under Joe Biden's watch. Despite that appalling fact, the Democrats still won 73,912,254 votes.

So the Democrats, AIPAC, and AIPAC sister organizations will be fine in the upcoming elections while the Palestinians continue getting cleansed to make way for Jared Kushner's luxury beachside resorts for Israeli oligarchs and lunatic Settlers.

Antiwar Samaritans and pacifists are the ones without someone decent to vote for in many places.



#26 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-05-04 06:32 PM | Reply

Campaign Finance Reform is the answer to SO many problems in the country... no Corporations, no Foreign Governments.

#27 | Posted by Corky at 2026-05-04 07:15 PM | Reply

Hi Corky

By Tuesday 5 Nov 2024, Throughout the month of October, 2024, the Trump campaign (and associated entities) spent $300,000,000.00 on ads in all 7 swing states during televised NFL and NCAA football games. The topic of all of those ads? Then-CA Attorney General Kamala Harris' 2019 response to a question about a Trump administration dictate on gender-affirming (read: trans) care for federal inmates


click graphic above for actual She's for They/Them ad

And the amount of money the Harris campaign spent countering those She's for They/Them ads in the swing states during NFL and NCAA football games? You know, to point out the truth that she was simply responding to a question about a Trump administration dictate on gender-affirming for federal inmates? To counter the deceptive, the lying-by-omission ads run by Trump & company?

Zero dollars

The efficacy of this strategy was born out election night, 2024, when Steve Kornacki was calling individual counties (starting with Pennsylvania) and highlighting that the Harris/Walz ticket was falling short of votes as opposed to the votes in the 2020 election for the Biden/Harris ticket. His reporting was, in effect, a death by 1,000 cuts for Harris/Walz.

Trump & company knew that all it would take would be the suppression of Biden votes in 2024 by just a point or two for Trump to carry those counties, all 7 swing states and, ultimately, the election. They judged, correctly, that men - men of color and white - would be turned off enough by the "pro-trans" Harris that they voted for Trump, or didn't vote at all.

Either way, mission accomplished.

#28 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-04 10:48 PM | Reply

Hi Corky

Five Reasons Harris Lost

Why Kamala Harris lost: A flawed candidate or doomed campaign?

Wrong voters, wrong message: progressives' autopsy lays bare Kamala Harris failures

Why Kamala Harris lost the election

Brookings: Why Donald Trump won and Kamala Harris lost: An early analysis of the results

There is no one reason Harris lost

Politicians and activists are trying to sell disingenuous and nonfactual explanations of why Harris lost to push their ideology. Don't fall for it.
Democrats were united and turned out. Harris lost anyway.
Voters issued a broad repudiation of not only Harris' campaign but the Democratic Party's vision for the country.
A Former Republican Strategist on Why Harris Lost
Inflation, moderation, and candidate effects
What Was the Biggest Factor in Kamala Harris's Defeat?

#29 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-04 10:49 PM | Reply

Hi Corky

Trump hammered Democrats on transgender issues. Now the party is at odds on a response

By Bill Barrow and Marc Levy

NOV. 14, 2024

www.ap.org

#30 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-04 10:51 PM | Reply

I'm guessing Democrats are still not talking about their own report on the "autopsy."

#31 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-05-04 11:25 PM | Reply

#31 "I'm guessing Democrats are still not talking about their own report on the "autopsy.""

The last time a political party had an official autopsy on their electoral failure was in 2013, following Obama's reelection the previous year.

Less than two years later, the candidate who ultimately became the Republican nominee tore up that "autopsy" and basically did everything opposite of what it recommended.

Why is it that so-called "progressives" are so intent on destroying the only alternative to Trump, MAGA and the Republican Party...

...The Democratic Party ? ? ? ?

#32 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-04 11:34 PM | Reply

Liberals are taking the Democratic Party back from corporate elites.

Feel free to vote for republicans to block progressive democrats of that makes you feel better.

#33 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-05-04 11:36 PM | Reply

#33 "Liberals" are doing no such thing, Clown.

The only issue is defeating Republican candidates, from the dog house (animal control) all the way to the White House.

Your defeatist attitude vis-a-vis Democratic Party candidates is just that... defeatist.

#34 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-04 11:43 PM | Reply

"Liberals" are doing no such thing, Clown.

Sure, whatever you say Tom Steyer.

#35 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-05-04 11:45 PM | Reply

Come November, if it is Steyer versus Hilton, who are you going to vote for?

I already said that if I lived in California I would gladly vote for Becerra in June.

But, if it isn't Becerra on the ballot in November, and it is Steyer, instead, then my vote would go to Steyer.

You ? ? ? ?

#36 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-04 11:46 PM | Reply

#35 Seriously, Clown:

Come November, if it is Steyer versus Hilton, who are you going to vote for?

I already said that if I lived in California I would gladly vote for Becerra in June.

But, if it isn't Becerra on the ballot in November, and it is Steyer, instead, then my vote would go to Steyer.

You ? ? ? ?

#37 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-04 11:47 PM | Reply

Not Tom Steyer.

That's for sure.

#38 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-05-04 11:48 PM | Reply

#38 So, you're voting for the Republican candidate for governor in California in November, if Tom Steyer is the Democratic nominee.

Noted, Clown.

#39 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-04 11:50 PM | Reply

Come November, if it is Steyer versus Hilton, who are you going to vote for?

I already said that if I lived in California I would gladly vote for Becerra in June.

Come November, if it is Steyer versus Hilton, who are you going to vote for?

But, if it isn't Becerra on the ballot in November, and it is Steyer, instead, then my vote would go to Steyer.

Come November, if it is Steyer versus Hilton, who are you going to vote for?

You ? ? ? ?

#40 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-04 11:51 PM | Reply

If you can't understand the infectious popularity of Bernie and AOC and Mamdani and Crockett and Talarico then you don't understand where this nation is heading.

Trying to force it to fall in line and return to being a corporate serving party of the Clinton era isn't going to work and will in fact continue to kill the party and America.

#41 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-05-04 11:52 PM | Reply

#41 Doesn't answer the question, Clown...

Come November, if it is Steyer versus Hilton, who are you going to vote for?

I already said that if I lived in California I would gladly vote for Becerra in June.

But, if it isn't Becerra on the ballot in November, and it is Steyer, instead, then my vote would go to Steyer.

You ? ? ? ?

#42 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-04 11:53 PM | Reply

#41 Oh, and the success of people like Bernie and AOC and Mamdani and Crockett and Talarico is in spite of your trashing the common denominator they all share:

They are members of the Democratic Party ...

... the only alternative to the Republican Party in America.

#43 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-04 11:55 PM | Reply

#41 "If you can't understand the infectious popularity of Bernie and AOC and Mamdani and Crockett..."

You mean this Crockett, Clown?


That Crockett, Clown?

#44 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-05 12:04 AM | Reply

There you go again.

With your spamming.

I'm never going to vote for Steyer.

Won't have to.

Besides. Steyer is a republican.

#45 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-05-05 12:07 AM | Reply

That Crockett, Clown?
#44 | POSTED BY A_FRIEND

Of course you don't like Crockett.

#46 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-05-05 12:08 AM | Reply

#45 "I'm never going to vote for Steyer."

SO, you prefer that the Republican candidate wins.

Noted, Clown.

#47 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-05 12:09 AM | Reply

#46 I absolutely adore Crockett.

'Tis people like Caius Marcius Coriolanus, who rely on AIPACTracker to condemn Democrats like the fantastic Crockett.

Why do you want people like Jasmine Crockett to lose because people like Caius Marcius Coriolanus - and you - find her not pure enough vis-a-vis Israel?

#48 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-05 12:12 AM | Reply

"A modern-day warrior, mean mean stride, today's Tom Steyer, mean mean pride."

www.youtube.com

#49 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-05-05 12:13 AM | Reply

#46 "Of course you don't like Crockett."

I absolutely adore Jasmine Crockett.

I do not damn her because some Web site says she's not pure enough vis-a-vis Israel.

You know, the way Caius Marcius Coriolanus damns Jasmine Crockett ... and any other Democrat who fails his purity test ...

... like the fantastic Jasmine Crockett.

#50 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-05 12:15 AM | Reply

Before Israel decided genocide was acceptable, no one thought twice about AIPACs influence on the government.

They were an allied nation.

There's a difference between supporting Israel pre and post genocide.

#51 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-05-05 12:16 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#51 Before Israel decided genocide was acceptable, no one thought twice about AIPACs influence on the government."

Your comment hits the nail right on the head.

Bravo, Clown.

Kudos ... and thank you.

#52 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-05 12:18 AM | Reply

#51 (Wish I had more than just a single Newsworthy flag for this post)

#53 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-05 12:19 AM | Reply

You do understand it was the continued support of Israel's actions that hurt Democrats in 2024, right?

Or do you ignore that?

#54 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-05-05 12:19 AM | Reply

#54 You do understand it was the continued support of Israel's actions that hurt Democrats in 2024, right?"

That's rewriting history to fit newer facts.

You will not find any serious study of the 2024 election results that points to "Israel's actions" as reasons why significant numbers of voters sat out the election because of Israel.

Besides... the Democrats' continued support of Israel's actions, as if Trump and the GOP were going to be Bibi antagonists?

Really?

#55 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-05-05 12:25 AM | Reply

#56 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-05-05 12:35 AM | Reply

the Democrats' continued support of Israel's actions, as if Trump and the GOP were going to be Bibi antagonists?

Musk and Republicans didn't have to prove they'd be better, just that Democrats wouldn't do anything differently.

Which democrats literally couldn't refute.

#57 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-05-05 12:41 AM | Reply

he Democrats' continued support of Israel's actions,

As they should.

#58 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-05-05 12:49 AM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort