Advertisement
Alberta, Canada Separatist Group: We Have Enough Signatures
Alberta separatists said Monday they have formally submitted almost 302,000 signatures to try to trigger a referendum on the province leaving Canada.
Menu
Front Page Breaking News Comments Flagged Comments Recently Flagged User Blogs Write a Blog Entry Create a Poll Edit Account Weekly Digest Stats Page RSS Feed Back Page
Subscriptions
Read the Retort using RSS.
RSS Feed
Author Info
LampLighter
Joined 2013/04/13Visited 2026/05/06
Status: user
MORE STORIES
Alberta, Canada Separatist Group: We Have Enough Signatures (13 comments) ...
AI Podcasts Now Comprise over a Third of New Shows (9 comments) ...
Greenland Ice Melt Has Surged and Scientists Are Alarmed (25 comments) ...
Reporter to Hegseth: When did the Pres decide to capitulate? (2 comments) ...
DOJ Official to Represent Bondi in Epstein Interview (12 comments) ...
Alternate links: Google News | Twitter
Alberta separatists have submitted nearly 302,000 signatures to trigger a referendum on leaving Canada. The group needed 178,000 signatures to force the province to consider the vote.[image or embed] -- The Associated Press (@apnews.com) May 4, 2026 at 9:00 PM
Alberta separatists have submitted nearly 302,000 signatures to trigger a referendum on leaving Canada. The group needed 178,000 signatures to force the province to consider the vote.[image or embed]
Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
More from the article ...
... The question of separation could go on a provincewide ballot as early as October, as Alberta Premier Danielle Smith has said she would move forward if enough names are gathered and verified. Smith has said she personally does not support the oil-rich province leaving Canada. A "yes" vote would not trigger independence automatically. Negotiations with the federal government would have to take place and Daniel Bland, a political science professor at McGill University in Montreal, said some Indigenous groups who are already using the courts to prevent an independence referendum would use venues including the courts to stop independence from happening. ...
A "yes" vote would not trigger independence automatically. Negotiations with the federal government would have to take place and Daniel Bland, a political science professor at McGill University in Montreal, said some Indigenous groups who are already using the courts to prevent an independence referendum would use venues including the courts to stop independence from happening. ...
#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-05-05 10:34 PM | Reply
Well, let the voters decide. I'll be there next week, should be interesting.
#2 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-05-05 10:39 PM | Reply
I'm in Alberta right now. I doubt this is going anywhere.
#3 | Posted by REDIAL at 2026-05-05 10:42 PM | Reply
@#3
Yeah, I saw an article that mentioned about a 30% approval in a vote.
But, as with our mid-terms, time will tell.
#4 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-05-05 10:54 PM | Reply
about a 30% approval in a vote
It's basically the "Freedom Convoy" crowd.
#5 | Posted by REDIAL at 2026-05-05 10:58 PM | Reply
There are so many things that really need to be discussed by the separatist crowd.
imo ... and nothing more ...
1) will NATO continue to protect Alberta should it remove itself from Canada?
2) will the border crossings between Alberta and the US change?
I could go on, but there is so much to be taken into account when a portion of a country decides that it is now a separate country.
I have to ask if the separationists have a clue about what they are asking for? Or are they too focused upon the one issue?
#6 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-05-05 11:13 PM | Reply
will NATO continue to protect Alberta
From what?
#7 | Posted by REDIAL at 2026-05-05 11:24 PM | Reply
From what? #7 | Posted by REDIAL
canadian land acknowledgements?
#8 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-05-05 11:26 PM | Reply
canadian land acknowledgements
Right up NATO's alley.
#9 | Posted by REDIAL at 2026-05-05 11:29 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1
Why do they want to be out of Canada?
Who's driving this movement?
What will it mean?
#10 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2026-05-06 03:06 PM | Reply
1) Maybe. Would require discussions between NATO and an independent Alberta. Till that is done, NATO protection of Alberta would only consist of what's necessary to protect the rest of Canada and the USA. -- Theoretically, someone (say China or Russia - dunno, don't question, this is an unrealistic hypothetical after all) could request permission from Canada and/or USA for overflight to allow the bombing or airborne troop deployment against Alberta. Of course if it ever got to that point, Canada and/or the USA (probably with First Nations' support) would do the job themselves.
2) Procedures and some personnel would likely be changed. Actual crossing points would probably remain unchanged until addressed separately.
#11 | Posted by Rational_Inject at 2026-05-06 03:19 PM | Reply
Why do they want to be out of Canada? Who's driving this movement? What will it mean? #10 | Posted by Effeteposer
Same people who brought you Brexit. What it means is a step further towards parting out the West for scrap.
#12 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-05-06 04:14 PM | Reply
I wonder if they've considered the difficulties of foreign trade, as they would become a landlocked nation.
#13 | Posted by Whatsleft at 2026-05-06 04:43 PM | Reply
Post a comment The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed. Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it. Username: Password: Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy
The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy