Because he's an idiot who needs to create the illusion of majority and normalcy to feel comfortable expressing an opinion.

Because he's not actually capable of think or rationalizing for himself.

Do you need a tissue?

#10 | Posted by BellRinger

No, I need you to realize you're a f*&^ing idiot who should just be content sitting on their worthless a&& and SingTFU because you are an idiot who is clearly incapable of judging character or reality.

Have you seen any pics of Obama's presidential center? It's absolutely hideous.

We're not talking about differences of artistic opinion here. We're talking about this repulsive sack of s*&^ trying to stamp his embarrassment of a last name across an entire skyline.

We all know you think about truckers when looking at a picture of the Obama presidential center.

Yawn. Still isn't funny, dips*&^.

Firearms all leave unique "scratches" on spent bullets,

Yes, rifling and the inside of a barrel leave unique marks.

If you have a bullet to compare.

It traumatized her so much, her letterhead, as seen on her lawsuit against the comedian who portrayed her as fat, lists her first occupation as "Widow."

I hadn't heard about that. That's even grosser than I ever imagined.

How do you know that, there's pictures of the body?

#36 | Posted by snoofy

Not to be graphic...but if it was a 30-06 at that range, you'd see blood spray and chunks all over behind him, not just the catastrophic bleeding from the entrance wound.

A 30-06 would go through a steel plate at that range. See this video as an example. Start at about 8:30.

ery poor journalism.

#2 | Posted by sentinel

That's science "journalism" in general. It's been that way for about 20 years.

imo, this is a key event for NASA.

Ummmmm not a hard call to make considering it's the second SLS launch (after much delay) and the first manned mission to leave LEO and go to the moon in what, 54 years?

Add to it they're live streaming the entire thing, so a less than successful launch is, at best, egg all over their face with a launch day scrub or, at worst, a catastrophic failure Challenger-level tragedy on even greater display.

All this with s*&^head, anti-science Republicans who would love nothing better than to cut NASA funding watching who would jump at the opportunity and have their fat, worthless faces before the cameras before the debris even hit the water.

Who still supports this garbage?

#4 | Posted by LegallyYourDead

Cucksorship.

#27 | Posted by oneironaut

Meaningless drivel.

Like the rest of what you post.

But America I have noticed doesn't want to enforce its own laws, just politicize them ... see sanctuary cities.

#25 | Posted by oneironaut

Ahhhh yes, in a thread about a major US retailer charging more than weight labels indicate, our resident librul onelumpofs*&^ shows up to try to spin it to DuMbCrAtZ!!

STFU idiot. F*&^ off.

It was a head shot that dropped more than expected because the rifle was pointed slightly down; not level with the ground.

#18 | Posted by snoofy

Downward shots don't "drop more" than expected, they impact higher than expected because downward trajectories decrease the effect of gravity.

Apparently, this wasn't an angle steep enough to have those types of effects. From what I've heard.

What we do know is he was struck in a very effective place that caused massive cardiovascular injury, massive CNS injury and, supposedly, massive skeletal injury.

The oddest thing is that this all occurred without any exit wound...from a 30-06...at about 100 yards...

Many have pointed out that his widow's behavior has been bizarre, but it could be linked to the trauma she endured. So I will refrain from raw-dogging on her.

#17 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Imagine she's a democrat.

Then cut lose.

Because this is remotely constitutional.

Be FOR something and not just anti-Trump.

You voted for Trump.

Sit this one out and STFU you stupid piece of s*&^.

Or they want someone to tell them that their worldview is correct.

#7 | Posted by REDIAL

Or they're such pathetic cuck sacks of s*&^ like pedoringer they'd rather give flippant, known bulls*&^ answers than admit they were so f*&^ing stupid they voted for Trump again and acknowledge that exactly what they were told would happen is happening.

The news media has nobody to blame but themselves for their cratered credibility.

#5 | Posted by BellRinger

STFU you stupid piece of ----.

Better yet, go play in traffic.

But you can bet your a&& that idiots like pedoringer will pay $50 per person to ride the golden elevator to the observation deck where they'll take a $39.99 a pop green screen photo making it look like they're standing next to Trump in Mar-a-S*&^hole with that stupid grin and thumbs up pose.

A library for a man that can't read. Only in America.

#13 | Posted by Alexandrite

It will probably be filled with stolen American heirlooms like The Resolute Desk, framed fake magazine covers, classified documents and the crayon drawn presidential briefings this idiot gets every day.

Vulgar. Garish. I don't know what other words to apply to this Buffoon abomination.

#10 | Posted by et_al

Trumpish

It looks like a skyscraper but it's nowhere near as ugly as Obama's.

#7 | Posted by BellRinger

Of course, pedoringer would find a way to make it about Obama.

This f*&^stick has thrown away every moral, value, ideal, principle ect ect to be a reliable pedo protector but still gets the vapors to find tan suit man the worst.

What a waste of f*&^ing oxygen.

They're not as far as I can tell. They're banking on the Biden strategy in 2020 because the only thing that makes stupid, fat Americans remember something is they have to be currently living it.

And Trump didn't rely on independents. He relied on his idiot base showing up to vote for him no matter what while using subterfuge and misinformation along with unintentionally complicit dems stepping on their own d*&^s to keep opposition voting down.

Doesn't help that Musk may or may not have messed with vote tallies.

I'll vote for any POTUS candidate that doesn't make me smile when I envision them choking on a Big Mac.

Is this really surprising?

Reread my #73. Specifically what I quoted from the embedded article.

#75 | Posted by BellRinger

Reread my bulls*&^ post where I justify being a pedo protector by using the typical denier strategy of taking myopic details, "debunking" them and then using that to ignore the totality of evidence.

-pedoringer

Lamp likes up the rear

#71 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Apparently so do you based on the frequency of posts about d*&^ in your mouth and stuff up a rear.

Wait wait, are you Kristi Noem's husband?

So, nothing. Click bait trash from The Daily Beast.

Eat s*&^, pedo protector.