This is kind of understood from generations ago when people who favored their left hand got smacked with a ruler and forced to use their right hand.

Like when we deposed the leader of Iraq, throwing their civil society into chaos, leading to the deaths of hundreds of thousands if not millions of Iraqi civilians.

This is what Republicans have always wanted for Iran. Murdering millions of Iranian civilians would be a Republican wet dream come true.

Don't take my word for it. Just ask any Republican. They'll be happy to tell you.

"Just answer my question how Trump has reversed laws harming gays."

President Donald Trump has reversed multiple federal protections for LGBTQ+ individuals through executive orders issued at the start of his second term in January 2025. These actions include revoking Executive Order 11246, which had prohibited employment discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity for federal contractors and employees, affecting approximately 14,000 transgender federal workers and over 100,000 LGBTQ+ employees of federal contractors.

Key rollbacks include:
Housing and shelters: Repeal of the "Equal Access Rule," removing protections against housing discrimination for LGBTQ+ people and barring transgender women from domestic violence shelters.
Foster care: Removal of safeguards for LGBTQ+ foster youth, including protections from hostile placements and so-called "conversion therapy."

--AI Summary, snipped to cut out the Trans specific stuff, since you're a supporter of harming Trans people.

"It's not the government's job to groom children."

You say it's grooming children to teach children All Men Are Created Equal.
All Men Are Created Equal, inducing gays, lesbians, transgenders, queers, and everyone else.
That's grooming to you.

You hate gays so passionately, you can't possibly consider they are equal to us straights.
They don't and deserve the same representation in society as straight white men.

You really have no idea what grooming it, it seems.
You've been grooming yourself to hate gays ever since the Navy kicked you out for being a gay.

"But nothing specific against gays."

This is specifically against gays, lesbians, transgenders, queers, and anyone else non-conforming.
As well as against straight people who think gays, lesbians, transgenders, queers, and anyone else deserves equality:

"Schools face threats of withheld federal funding for LGBTQ-inclusive education"

"Transgenders have been decided to not be considered able to be combat ready."

And you believed that?
There's absolutely no basis for the claim that transgenders are not "combat ready."
If we're going by testosterone levels, trans men are on par with biological males.

So, what else would you like to go by?
Or do you want gay men to not be considered combat ready too?

You ------- racist
#72 | Posted by lfthndthrds

---- you.
#71 | Posted by lfthndthrds

^
I'm doing a victory lap around these posts where I broke you.
Just thought you should know, that's what you're reading right now.

---- you.
#71 | Posted by lfthndthrds

---- me?
You can't get your dick hard enough to ---- at all.

--------- regret and shriveled balls anger drips off everything you post.
Go have another drink, your dopamine levels are counting on it.

"I see you changed"

I didn't change.
Trump changed the military, when put a White Nationalist and misogynist -- who is about as good at being a closeted homosexual as you are -- in charge of the Pentagon.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has reportedly intervened to block the promotions of specific Black and female officers in recent months. In March 2026, Hegseth reportedly removed two Black men and two women from an Army promotion list for one-star general, a move criticized as politically motivated. In May 2026, he similarly stripped nine Navy officers, including two Black men and three women, from a list to become one-star admirals, resulting in an all-male, overwhelmingly white slate of nominees. --AI Summary

Isn't this also the region of the country that has the most new homes and surveillance data centers being built?

I mean, we've only known they didn't have enough water there since Jack Nicholson starred in Chinatown...

Or was that whole thing another one of Al Gore's hoaxes?

Always the gun, never the shooter.
#3 | Posted by sitzkrieg

Most shooters would be harmless and impotent without their guns.
Not sure how you haven't figured that out.
You probably have figured it out, but you just don't like admitting it.
You're not as stupid as you like to pretend.

You hate black people found innocent of murdering white women.. Just say it...
#61 | Posted by lfthndthrds

I hate racist cops miscarrying justice.
It's no surprise that you're fine with racist cops miscarrying justice.

Hey Snoofy, Who get's the promotions in the military?
#64 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Not any women, not any black people. Not under Trump.
But you won't say that's racist and sexist.
You have nothing to say.

"Who do you think is right, you or Exxon in 1982?"

^
You couldn't answer because you're afraid to.

And no Democrat had both houses and the Executive branch since? STFU loser... go back on sabbatical. maybe hit the sweat lodge for a week or two.
#8 | Posted by lfthndthrds

And Democrats rolled out a lot of green energy policies.
And then your boy Trump has been actively cancelling them.
Killing projects already approved and already poured billions of dollars into them.

What's up with that?
Why is alternative energy bad, do you think windmills cause cancer too, like Trump says?

Obama was the biggest friend oil companies as they started fracking operations.
#9 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Until Trump.

Did Obama do anything that was likewise friendly to alternative energy sources that aren't fossil fuel based?
Did Trump?

"Never heard the term cinnamon ring"

He wants to spend the rest of his life
He could be happy the rest of his life
With a cinnamon ring
--LftHndThrds Young

Imagine how convoluted your "morals" must be when you're saying OJ didn't murder Nicole, all just to protect Trump.

"Is the world supposed to blind to the fact OJ is a black man?"

No more that the world supposed to be blind to the fact that OJ murdered Nicole and Ron.
You, by your own choice, have chosed to embrace that blindness.

It's largely because you're just not very smart.
Which is why your mental defensive postures are usually pretty easy to overcome.

The only defense which really serves you any more is when you flee the DR.

-You brought race into this discussion
Where?
#56 | Posted by lfthndthrds

black man
#53 | Posted by lfthndthrds

And no democrat did anything!?!?
#6 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Reagan was President at the time.
Al Gore's movie came later.
You didn't believe Al Gore, even though Exxon did in 1982.
Who do you think is right, you or Exxon in 1982?

"He knew the risks when he signed up."
--President Donald J. TRUMP

and apparently racist
#53 | Posted by lfthndthrds

You brought race into this discussion, because you're looking for anything to distract from the 28 sexual misconduct allegations that Trump settled out of court.

If Trump isn't guilty, why did he settle out of court? That's the type of question you think is a real "gotcha." So what's your answer?

Their governor you tried to pencil in also pardons child rapists
#3 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Yeah and Trump deported him anyway. I'm curious how you think Walz's pardon actually harmed anyone.

Would you like to talk about your feelings?
It's a personal thing, because you were raped as a child, right?

Am I doing this right?
#49 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Are you?
"OJ didn't kill Nicole" is you doing it right.
And you actually believe it, too.
You pick and choose facts like Trump and Epstein picking fourteen year old girls.

Ok we can go with assaulted. But she wasnt raped
#43 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Oh I see. What an important distinction!
Does that make it okay for you to receive financial benefits from a man who sexually assaulted a woman, and lied about it so badly he was found guilty of defamation?

That's okay, but if she had been under 18, that would have crossed a lie for you?
Nobody believes that. You especially don't believe that.
There's nothing Trump could do to lose your love.

Rape is criminal. She was adamant that she wasn't raped.
#43 | Posted by lfthndthrds

You said a minute ago that a jury verdict construes proof. Now you're saying it doesn't.
The jury must not have believed her, since they agreed with her that Trump defamed her when he lied about sexually assaulting her.
Now you disagree with the jury.

You're desperate and flailing, and the reason you don't notice it, is because desperate and flailing is how you go through life.

Trump pardoned child rapists when he pardoned the J6 rioters.
LMAO
No he didn't.
#41 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Meanwhile, back in reality:

Even Carroll was very clear that he didn't rape her. She wanted a civil trial.

#37 | Posted by lfthndthrds

LOL!!!
Defamation is a civil tort.

The civil trial is merely a reflection of the fact that Trump's freedom of speech to lie about not raping her does not constitute a criminal act.

Trump did rape E. Jean Carroll, right?
#33 | Posted by snoofy

Not according to the jury.
#35 | Posted by lfthndthrds

I didn't ask the jury.
I asked you.
You're not man enough to answer.
You're not man enough to have your own opinions.

"You idiots voted for Walz - a guy who pardons child rapists"

Trump pardoned child rapists when he pardoned the J6 rioters.
And you gladly voted for him, in no small part because those pardons were so well-deserved in your mind.