Judges on Rapid Deportations: Americans Could Be Next

Saturday, May 10, 2025

Judges across the country continue to note that if courts don't protect the rights of the least popular and most vulnerable, everyone is at

Posted by retort at 10:46 AM | 45 COMMENTS | permalink

BREAKING: Top Trump adviser Stephen Miller says the administration is "looking at" ways to end due process protections for unauthorized immigrants who are in the country.[image or embed]
-- NBC News (@nbcnews.com) May 9, 2025 at 5:19 PM

Comments

It was always planned that Americans be next.

The point is to have the power to squash internal dissent.

By disappearing people, in the tradition of fascist Argentine colonels.

Our Dirty War will likely begin as soon as the economy makes even the most stupid of MAGAS squeal.

#1 | Posted by Zed at 2025-05-10 10:52 AM

Next? It's already happening to children.

#2 | Posted by northguy3 at 2025-05-10 10:55 AM

Just more dem fear-mongering.

#3 | Posted by MSgt at 2025-05-10 11:13 AM

#2,

That's an illegal mothers fault.

#4 | Posted by boaz at 2025-05-10 11:42 AM

These deportations are in addition to the 3 million expulsions of migrants crossing the border irregularly

_what was the due process for these 3 million? They were, after all, in the country, and persons, yes?

archive.is

www.migrationpolicy.org

From May 2023 through March 2024, 316,000 migrants were processed via expedited removal, more than in any prior full fiscal year.
"expedited removal"

_what's that? Is it a 'due process'?

Whereas President Barack Obama was labeled by some as the "deporter in chief," this new trend may earn President Joe Biden the title of "returner in chief." Notably, authorities have deported migrants to more than 170 countries during the current administration, which may be the most ever.

_Where was politico then?
I would supply a primary source for this thread, but there isn't one. It's all politico trotskyist drivel.

#5 | Posted by chiligordo at 2025-05-10 11:47 AM

Of course they're going after American citizens.

"The home grown are next."
-Trump

They're arresting mayors and Judges who impede their efforts.

And sadly. No one is fighting back.

Everyone too busy just trying to pretend this is all normal or that it won't eventually effect them.

#6 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-05-10 11:51 AM

WHERE WERE YOU when BIDEN FOUGHT AGAINST DUE PROCESS??

archive.is

www.aclu.org

The Biden Administration is on the Wrong Side in This Crucial Supreme Court Immigration Case
A case before the court will determine whether immigrants have access to a bond hearing to justify detention, and whether advocates can use a critical tool to bring them relief.

Beyond the denial of bond hearings, there is another way in which the Biden administration has picked the wrong side of this fight. The administration argues that a provision of the immigration laws prevents federal courts from entering a standard form of relief in civil rights cases " a class-wide injunction " in cases challenging the government's detention and deportation practices. Practically, this is a systemic attack on immigrants' rights.

www.aclu.org
January 7, 2022

#7 | Posted by chiligordo at 2025-05-10 11:55 AM

archive.is
www.tribtoday.com

Yes, deport without due process
If Joe Biden effectuated his immigration policy without due process, why can't Donald Trump do the same with his?

That's the question raised by Joe Biden's effortlessly permitting millions of people to enter the country illegally and Donald Trump's having to go through extensive exertions to remove (or keep removed) one illegal immigrant, Kilmar Abrego Garcia.
Abrego Garcia shouldn't have been deported to El Salvador, but the point still stands " illegal immigrants can be imported by the millions, with nothing more than a notice to appear and a bus ticket to their preferred destination, while there's a time-consuming process to remove them by the thousands.
This disparity inherently favors illegal immigration.

#8 | Posted by chiligordo at 2025-05-10 11:58 AM

ColdFatso has a severe case of BDS.

#9 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-05-10 11:59 AM

law.ucla.edu

No Fair Day: Damning New Report Reveals the Biden Administration's Unlawful Treatment of Children in Immigration Courts

December 13, 2023

Data show that tens of thousands of children have been ordered deported, most without legal representation or a fair day in court

#10 | Posted by chiligordo at 2025-05-10 12:02 PM

Re #2

Thx for reminding us of maga's motto:

Blame the victims.

#11 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-05-10 12:03 PM

Ack.

Post 11 should have been regarding post 4

But certainly Bozo would have no trouble blaming the children too.

#12 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-05-10 12:05 PM

#10

Whataboutisms are still logical fallacies; accusations of hypocrisy aren't an argument to the point.

So you are being rather pointless again.

#13 | Posted by Corky at 2025-05-10 12:23 PM

You know what they say at weddings and funerals...

#14 | Posted by sentinel at 2025-05-10 12:27 PM

When you are "looking at ways to end due process protections" then you are doing it wrong.

#15 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-05-10 12:30 PM

Next headline

Judges on jailing criminals:

YOU COULD BE JAILED NEXT

ya know, if you commit a crime

Or in this situation if you're in the country illegally, you could be deported next.

If you're not, you won't be though.

#16 | Posted by THEBULL at 2025-05-10 12:41 PM

I just got off the phone with Tom Homan and he was requesting Zed and Legally's addresses.

#17 | Posted by Bluewaffles at 2025-05-10 01:14 PM

"If you're not, you won't be though."

You will though.

We deported American kids, rather than let them stay with their American father.

#18 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-10 01:36 PM

Whataboutisms are still logical fallacies; accusations of hypocrisy aren't an argument to the point.

So you are being rather pointless again.

#13 | Posted by Corky

The point is, no one here complained then for similar events; but they complain now. This indicates that the complaints are based not on what happened instead they are based on who did it. This distinction moves any argument you may make from a rational one to an irrational (emotional) one.

>Whataboutisms are still logical fallacies
It's a principle of consistency; every case should be judged similarly. Our legal system is based on precedent; will you say that too is invalid? That 'laws' apply differently to various actors?

You're simply repeating a buzzword you read somewhere in an echo chamber.

#19 | Posted by itchyp at 2025-05-10 01:38 PM

Insults and cancel culture are not valid debate tools

#20 | Posted by itchyp at 2025-05-10 01:40 PM

That's an illegal mothers fault.
#4 | Posted by boaz

Illegal mothers don't have the power to deport children.

Only Uncle Sam can do that.

#21 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-10 01:41 PM

It is mind-blowing how many so-called "Americans" are willing to casually suspend due process for people currently living in this country. Do they even understand what the American Constitution has always stood for?

#22 | Posted by moder8 at 2025-05-10 02:11 PM

"It is mind-blowing how many so-called "Americans" are willing to casually suspend due process for people currently living in this country. "

No more mind blowing than when it happened in Germany in the 1930.

#23 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-10 02:28 PM

Why is Trump allowing an invasion?
I thought Trump secured the border.
What am I missing, Republicans?

#25 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-10 02:37 PM

"That's an illegal mothers fault.

So now BOAZ supports abortiion?" Is abortion OK if the potential mother is an undocumented alien? Morality and consistency seem to be dependent on political ideology; makes me question the basic claim of morality. If God frowns on abortion do you think He frowns less if the mother is an undocumented immigrant? Then, if the child is born to undocumented immigrants who work in thw fields harvesting the vegetables we eat every day are we better off kicking them out of the country while the crops rot in the field? Hey, let's give the Statue of Liberty back to the French because the United States doesn't deserve it. And BTW, I don't say America because every nation in North an South America has the same right to call themselves Americans and many or even most of the people the hat the haters are deporting actually can prove that they are descendants of Native Americans; as such they have a right to live and work and vote in the United States OF the Americas both North and South and the Caribbean which was the closest Columbus ever got to this country.

#26 | Posted by danni at 2025-05-10 02:38 PM

Boaz doesn't believe in a higher power.

Boaz only believes in the supremacy of The State over the individual.

#27 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-10 02:40 PM

#24: ...unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.

This is why the Trump junta uses the term "invasion" in charging documents, press releases, EOs, or presidential proclamations, to seed the American mind with these poisonous lies, making suspension of habeas corpus easier to enact.

This case is part of Operation Take Back America, a nationwide initiative that marshals the full resources of the Department of Justice to repel the invasion of illegal immigration, achieve the total elimination of cartels and transnational criminal organizations (TCOs), and protect our communities from the perpetrators of violent crime.

Link: drudge.com

#28 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-05-10 02:48 PM

- The point is, no one here complained then for similar events; but they complain now.

That's the very definition on accusing people of hypocrisy rather than arguing the point.

And did you forget which sock you were using? ROFL!

#29 | Posted by Corky at 2025-05-10 03:39 PM

"Donald Trump's having to go through extensive exertions to remove (or keep removed) one illegal immigrant, Kilmar Abrego Garcia."

^
When you have to lie, you're probably on the wrong side of the issue.

I don't think I will ever really be able to understand why you people think it's okay to routinely lie about what's going on in the world.

#30 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-10 04:55 PM

- The point is, no one here complained then for similar events; but they complain now.

That's the very definition on accusing people of hypocrisy rather than arguing the point.

And did you forget which sock you were using? ROFL!

#29 | Posted by Corky

- Please allow me to elaborate: the point I was making is the 'hypocrisy'; not the deporting.
Go ahead and address the rest of the post, if you are confident in your opinion:
"It's a principle of consistency; every case should be judged similarly. Our legal system is based on precedent; will you say that too is invalid? That 'laws' apply differently to various actors?"

Our entire legal system runs on the whatabout principle

It's called precedent and it works like this: Lawyer says "Judge this situation was addressed in [cites case] and my client did the same thing, so whataboutism means that my client has the same argument as whoever, and furthermore your honor, whataboutism is fair and equal treatment under da law"

-Using the buzzword of the day to preclude opinion is disingenuous and an affront to logic.

Change my mind.

#31 | Posted by itchyp at 2025-05-10 05:42 PM

Oh and about poor Fat Peter (aka CHILIGORDO):
I am not Fat Peter, he is mi amigo de Mehico; he was spirited away sans due process in a latenight raid and is now confined incommunicado for an indeterminate period. He may self-deport because PTSD from his arbitrary and unfair apprehension.
Poor Fat Peter. Please consider contributing to his GiveSendGo, or alternately send some fresh tortilla y corona money to his canteen account c/o
'Jannie@DR.com'

#32 | Posted by itchyp at 2025-05-10 05:51 PM

...As Fat Peter was being arrested, he called out to me: "Tell Corky I love him"

#33 | Posted by itchyp at 2025-05-10 06:17 PM

...Actually it was more like: "Dell Corkie I loove heem"
His accent is so cute. I smiled through my tears, "I weel" I said "I weel dell Corky djou love heem!"
"Bony snatches mi amigo! Gracias por todos!" were his last words to me...
:'(

#34 | Posted by itchyp at 2025-05-10 06:24 PM

God damn them! I can't even see Fat Peter's plonks any more, or even his birthday!
It's like they tried to erase him, to deny that he even existed!
I can't stop crying... those bastards...

#35 | Posted by itchyp at 2025-05-10 08:42 PM

I hesitate to ask, but what the hell are you babbling about?

#36 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-05-10 08:48 PM

He needs a diaper changing again... it's Cult thing.

#37 | Posted by Corky at 2025-05-10 08:52 PM

ie: Mormons do it, Trumpers do it.

Pickled Pete can do it while drunkenly attacking his secretary.

#38 | Posted by Corky at 2025-05-10 08:54 PM

#36
see #32

#39 | Posted by itchyp at 2025-05-10 10:14 PM

#36
see #32

A sock puppet got banned? Make another one.