Newly declassified information contradicts Brennan's testimony before Congress on the origins of the now-debunked Russian collusion conspiracy theory. There is a particular focus on the intelligence community assessment commissioned by President Barack Obama in December 2016, which suggested that Russia had interfered in the 2016 presidential election to help Donald Trump.
Obama ordered the assessment after a prior assessment found no evidence of collusion or influence on the election in Trump's favor. But Obama's White House effectively quashed that finding from seasoned CIA analysts. To create a new version, Brennan handpicked new analysts, who effectively flipped the earlier finding on its head without any credible basis in the record.
The new assessment relied, to a significant degree, on the Steele dossier, a widely discredited report paid for by Hillary Clinton's campaign that contained unfounded allegations about Trump.
In testimony on May 23, 2017, Brennan claimed that the Steele dossier "wasn't part of the corpus of intelligence information that we had. It was not in any way used as a basis for the Intelligence Community Assessment that was done." In short, Brennan dismissed any reliance on the dossier.
Yet in the material now declassified, Brennan is shown not just discussing the dossier but insisting upon its inclusion in the new assessment Obama had requested. Indeed, he expressly overruled the CIA's two most senior Russia experts, who said it "did not meet even the most basic tradecraft standards."
The Steele Dossier: A Retrospective (2018)
www.lawfaremedia.org
... Not all of the material in the dossier has been proven. But none has been disproven. As a raw intelligence document, the Steele dossier holds up well. ...
The dossier compiled by former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele remains a subject of fascination"or, depending on your perspective, scorn. ...
The dossier is actually a series of reports"16 in all"that total 35 pages. Written in 2016, the dossier is a collection of raw intelligence. Steele neither evaluated nor synthesized the intelligence. He neither made nor rendered bottom-line judgments. The dossier is, quite simply and by design, raw reporting, not a finished intelligence product.
In that sense, the dossier is similar to an FBI 302 form or a DEA 6 form. Both of those forms are used by special agents of the FBI and DEA, respectively, to record what they are told by witnesses during investigations. The substance of these memoranda can be true or false, but the recording of information is (or should be) accurate. In that sense, notes taken by a special agent have much in common with the notes that a journalist might take while covering a story"the substance of those notes could be true or false, depending on what the source tells the journalist, but the transcription should be accurate.
With that in mind, we thought it would be worthwhile to look back at the dossier and to assess, to the extent possible, how the substance of Steele's reporting holds up over time. In this effort, we considered only information in the public domain from trustworthy and official government sources, including documents released by Special Counsel Robert Mueller's office in connection with the criminal cases brought against Paul Manafort, the 12 Russian intelligence officers, the Internet Research Agency trolling operation and associated entities, Michael Cohen, Michael Flynn and George Papadopoulos.
We also considered the draft statement of offense released by author Jerome Corsi, a memorandum released by House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Ranking Member Adam Schiff related to the Carter Page FISA applications and admissions directly from certain speakers.
These materials buttress some of Steele's reporting, both specifically and thematically. The dossier holds up well over time, and none of it, to our knowledge, has been disproven. ...
How the anti-Trump dossier came to be (2017)
www.pbs.org
... The Washington Free Beacon, a conservative site based in Washington, D.C., confirmed that it hired the firm Fusion GPS to unearth damaging information about President Donald Trump in the run-up to the election. GOP donor and billionaire Paul Singer is one of the site's key backers. ...
The secret funder of a once secret dossier of opposition research on Donald Trump has been unmasked. The dossier, produced during last year's presidential campaign, purported to document possible connections between Russians and Trump Organization business or the Trump campaign.
The Washington firm Fusion GPS had been hired to produce the dossier during the Republican primary season, and it eventually assigned the task to a British former intelligence officer named Christopher Steele. That's all been known for months.
Now, we know who originally hired Fusion GPS. The chairman and the editor of the conservative website Washington Free Beacon confirm they did so for information on "multiple Republican candidates." ...
The Russia probe: A timeline from Moscow to Mueller (2019)
abcnews.go.com
... This timeline is based on publicly-released FBI documents, congressional records and testimony, court filings, and certain media reports confirmed to ABC News by sources with knowledge of the matter. It will be updated as new information becomes available.
Four key takeaways:
-- In the months before the 2016 presidential election, the FBI was uncovering efforts by the Russian government to interfere in the election, and the FBI was trying to assess unverified allegations that Trump's associates were aiding the Russian effort.
-- The FBI's counterintelligence probe was not launched because of the "dossier," but the "dossier" aided the investigation and offered unconfirmed tips for agents to explore.
-- Looking to share the work of a longtime acquaintance, senior Justice Department official Bruce Ohr passed on "dossier"-linked information to the FBI. But the first recorded meeting between Ohr and the FBI came four months after the FBI launched its investigation and a full month after the FBI used previously-obtained information from the "dossier" to support secret surveillance of Trump campaign adviser Carter Page.
-- Russian interference in the 2016 election was "sweeping and systematic fashion," Robert Mueller said in his report, a fact that was evidenced by the indictment last year of the whole Russian troll farm behind much of the social media interference, known as the Internet Research Agency. ...
"#7 | Posted by Corky"
Yep - not very bright. Then again, if they were smart, they would not have hooked their wagon to Obama in the first place. Even a ------- like yourself wanted Hillary because you knew Obama was a corrupt bum. They should have listened to you.
But, to solve a debate from a thread the other day:
Do you believe there is a Trump hooker pee tape?
Now, people like Alexandrite think that no one would be so ------- stupid as to believe this tape exists at this point. However, I think he is wrong and that you - in fact - are that ------- stupid.
So, can you please settle this debate? Is there a Trump hooker pee tape?
#8 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-26 08:40 PM
Trump Defends Putin While Questioning US Intelligence Agencies' Conclusions On Russia's Meddling In
I wonder if Trump will concede more to Putin? Perhaps allowing the total invasion of Ukraine?
Anything to distract from Epstein.
Drudge Retort Headlines
'Wake up, America, this is a serious moment' (216 comments)
Putin's Alaska Triumph (32 comments)
''BBB' Will Deny SNAP Benefits to Thousands of Veterans (30 comments)
Russia's Dirty Little Secret: a Dire Population Crisis (26 comments)
Trump-Putin Summit Will Be Hannitized (22 comments)
White House Orders a Review of Exhibits at Smithsonian Museums (21 comments)
AG Bondi Ramps Up Pressure on 32 Sanctuary Cities (19 comments)
US Faces Transformer Shortfall as Power Demand Surges (18 comments)
Washington Sues to Stop Federal Takeover (18 comments)
Kristi Noem Living Rent-Free in Coast Guard Residence (16 comments)