Sunday, September 28, 2025

Daily Caller Opinion Column 'Explicitly' Calls for Violence

The column, by editor at large Geoffrey Ingersoll, calls for "blood in the streets" in response to violence against conservatives.

More

In @nytopinion.nytimes.com "Violence that at least looks left-wing really does appear to be on the rise," our columnist Michelle Goldberg writes. "Yet the men committing the highest-profile left-coded killings have little discernible connection to progressive politics, on or offline."

[image or embed]

-- The New York Times (@nytimes.com) Sep 26, 2025 at 6:30 PM

Comments

It would be interesting to see a side by side comparison of all idiotic statements like this across the political spectrum recently, from an unbiased source.

#1 | Posted by sentinel at 2025-09-27 07:23 PM

Well, there is absolutely NOTHING comparable to the POTUS, the VP and major right wing news organizations on the left.

That is a simple fact.

#2 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-09-27 07:35 PM

Remember, righties are just pure, quiet angels minding their own business being unfairly targeted by anti-gun sissy libruls ...

#3 | Posted by jpw at 2025-09-27 08:56 PM

Comedians can't diss Trump, but Trump's mouthpieces can call for blood in the streets, no problem.

That's your MAGA America right there.

#4 | Posted by Corky at 2025-09-27 09:00 PM

They're going to get their wish, only it's not going to turn out like they planned. They're all nothing but ------- cowards.

#5 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2025-09-28 01:45 AM

In a racist society only racists are allowed to advocate violence.

#6 | Posted by fresno500 at 2025-09-28 03:54 AM

The real question is: Does steroid and testosterone supplement abuse make MAGAts like this dreary specimen nuts? Or does being a MAGAt nutter predispose one to abusing steroids and testosterone supplements? Or, more to the point perhaps, both?

#7 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2025-09-28 06:53 AM

#7 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

Interesting point...would certainly explain a lot...

#8 | Posted by Angrydad at 2025-09-28 09:46 AM

Well goodie gum drops...

So far today... a mass shooting in NC 3 dead 8 injured and one currently unfolding in MI 3 dead...9(?) injured

I dunno maybe they need more guns... start them younger... or something... clearly... they don't have enough guns.

#9 | Posted by RightisTrite at 2025-09-28 11:38 AM

Well goodie gum drops...

So far today... a mass shooting in NC 3 dead 8 injured and one currently unfolding in MI 3 dead...9(?) injured

I dunno maybe they need more guns... start them younger... or something... clearly... they don't have enough guns.

#9 | POSTED BY RIGHTISTRITE

Where are the "good guys with guns" I'm always hearing about?

#10 | Posted by a_monson at 2025-09-28 05:57 PM

Hey boaz, lfthndcuck, ballwasher et al,

How does this along with the MI shooting jive with your bulls^*% narrative?

Because it jives pretty damned well with our narrative, especially with tool bags like boaz constantly calling for violence.

#11 | Posted by jpw at 2025-09-29 10:17 AM

So this month the U.S. Department of Justice deleted a report that concluded far-right extremists were responsible for the majority of domestic terrorist attacks in recent years. Yep that's right. Let's bury the true culprit in domestic terrorism in the United States - coming from Trump's base.

Anyone think that's a coincidence that the Trump administration has been busy reframing (lying) that it's violence from the "radical left" that's the problem (Antifa! Portland! Chipocalypse! Arrrh! Drool!)

#12 | Posted by YAV at 2025-09-29 11:38 AM

I expect the call(s) for violence to get a lot louder the closer we get to the full release of the Epstein files. The unacceptable possibly that's been bugging me lately is...he wouldn't declare martial law to permanently forestall the files' release, would he?

#13 | Posted by dutch46 at 2025-09-29 10:25 PM

He advocated defending yourself violently because that's what is required nowadays.

#14 | Posted by THEBULL at 2025-09-30 06:28 AM

Conservatives looking to peacefully assemble and publicly debate need to be realistic. Nobody is going to help you. In fact, they're going to encourage violence. They're going to excuse, justify and encourage it.

We saw as much with Charlie Kirk. They were practically begging someone to go after him, and when someone did, they quickly justified it.

Well, I think now that we know the extent of it, the time to go as lambs to the slaughter is OVER.

In real terms, this means: Bring security with you that's dying to dole out drubbings. I'm sure a fair amount of ex-cons who found Jesus loved Charlie Kirk. Maybe they need work?

Whatever works. We need to reinstitute the cost.

So some activist takes the sign next to your table at a public debate, like what happened here? She gets instantly clotheslined. I don't care if police are present. Do it anyway. In fact, be wildly disproportionate.

A fat black lady assaults your on-camera talent? Book the kind of security that has no qualms hospitalizing her and people like her.

Dudes rope up your car and start vandalizing it? Bros dismounting with cudgels will fix that real quick. Turn it into an instant brawl. Break bones.

Force corrupt police to intervene. I want blood in the streets.

Speaking of costs, such a posture is indeed costly. It'll cost money, firstly. Security isn't cheap. It'd likely cost about $1,000 a day for just two guys. It'll also come at a social cost, and a legal cost. Bragg might not prosecute militant liberals, but he'll certainly take a conservative organization to court if his street brutes are harmed.

But you know what else isn't cheap? The social compact in America. It comes at a cost. If patriots aren't willing to step up and bear the burden, our people will continue to be harassed, assaulted, even killed with impunity.

What's clear to me in these two examples is that liberals believe they have a monopoly on both legal and extra-legal acts of violence. They don't. We need to show them they don't.

#15 | Posted by THEBULL at 2025-09-30 06:33 AM

He advocated defending yourself violently because that's what is required nowadays.

#14 | Posted by THEBULL

Well, that's just BULL.

#16 | Posted by Zed at 2025-09-30 08:22 AM

We need to reinstitute the cost.

THEBULL

To the extent that happens, I hope you experience it first.

#17 | Posted by Zed at 2025-09-30 08:24 AM

What's clear to me in these two examples is that liberals believe they have a monopoly on both legal and extra-legal acts of violence.

#15 | Posted by THEBULL

Well, this is just stupid.

Do you actually live in this country?

#18 | Posted by Zed at 2025-09-30 08:25 AM

Worldwide individuals won't ever let the Epstein files be seen. Too much power behind the names.

#19 | Posted by Petrous at 2025-09-30 08:49 AM

He advocated defending yourself violently because that's what is required nowadays.
#14 | POSTED BY THEBULL

Those supplements you wolf down? Baaaaad.

#20 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2025-09-30 09:13 AM

What's clear to me in these two examples is that liberals believe they have a monopoly on both legal and extra-legal acts of violence. They don't. We need to show them they don't.

#15 | Posted by THEBULL

That narrative is entirely made up in empty little head, dumbf(*&.

Simply to justify your own violence.

#21 | Posted by jpw at 2025-09-30 11:59 AM

The movie playing in El Toro's head sounds like a old Chuck Norris straight-to-video opus. Worst. Actor. Ever.

#22 | Posted by dutch46 at 2025-09-30 01:25 PM

Hey boaz, lfthndcuck, ballwasher et al,

How does this along with the MI shooting jive with your bulls^*% narrative?

Because it jives pretty damned well with our narrative, especially with tool bags like boaz constantly calling for violence.

#11 | Posted by jpw at 2025-09-29 10:17 AM | Reply | Flag:

Thanks for reminding me that I'm special enough to you to give me a shout out.

First, news outlets don't speak for me - that would be a position for your retarded ass.

Second, I have never called for violence of any sort

And third, if you believe violence and cray-cray is limited to a specific political spectrum, you are as retarded as I thought. My apologies for not saying it more.

#23 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2025-09-30 02:32 PM

" I have never called for violence of any sort"

You were just dead silent when those you enable called for it.

Basically a distinction without a difference.

#24 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-09-30 02:39 PM

And third, if you believe violence and cray-cray is limited to a specific political spectrum, you are as retarded as I thought. My apologies for not saying it more.
#23 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Now we're becoming "both sides" about it.

Glad to have you aboard. Just hoping you stay there beyond the next shooter that's actually identifiable as being "left."

#25 | Posted by jpw at 2025-09-30 02:43 PM

Second, I have never called for violence of any sort

#23 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRDS

I have no doubt that many ordinary members of the Nazi Party ever called explicitly for violence.

But they were, well, Nazis.

#26 | Posted by Zed at 2025-09-30 02:54 PM

And third, if you believe violence and cray-cray is limited to a specific political spectrum, you are as retarded as I thought. My apologies for not saying it more.

#23 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Straw men are easy to argue against.

Every side has cray cray.

Only ONE side elevated the cray cray to lead their entire party.

[this is that part where you pretend that something biden did is equal to the republicans' fascist coup attempt]

#27 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2025-09-30 04:02 PM

- if you believe violence and cray-cray is limited to a specific political spectrum,

It's not about belief, it's about Facts... which tell us that upwards of 80 percent of all domestic terror fatalities in this country are committed by white nationalists and white supremacists, and have been for decades.

www.google.com

#28 | Posted by Corky at 2025-09-30 04:28 PM

You were just dead silent when those you enable called for it.

Basically a distinction without a difference.

#24 | POSTED BY DANFORTH AT 2025-09-30 02:39 PM | REPLY |

Yet you watch LYD all for the death of the president and encourage suicide and Ive never seen you say a word. You're an idiot.

#29 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2025-09-30 05:14 PM

death of the president

#29 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRDS

If Trump dies for any reason there will be right wing conspiracy theories that lead to violence.

If Trump has a heart attack, it will be impossible to enjoy it.

#30 | Posted by Zed at 2025-09-30 05:23 PM

When you argue with a fool, you prove there are two.

#31 | Posted by sentinel at 2025-09-30 05:28 PM

- Posted by Corky at 2025-09-30 04:28 PM | Reply | Flagged funny by lfthndthrds

FF for when a TrumpTurd has no argument to support his outright lies.

#32 | Posted by Corky at 2025-09-30 05:38 PM

" you watch LYD all for the death of the president and encourage suicide and Ive never seen you say a word."

That's because I plonked him over a year ago.

And there's A WORLD of difference between a poster in a political chat room and an entire political party.

Got any other brilliant observations, Einstein?

#33 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-09-30 05:56 PM

"You were just dead silent when those you enable called for it.
Basically a distinction without a difference."

You're not serious.

I didn't see the ballot you cast in the last election nor any other election.

so I don't see how I can point to who you "enable".

and in any case.....it's just a vote. If you vote for someone, then they say something stupid or harmful, you didn't sign a contract that obligates you to denounce it.

Your silence isn't calling for it, it's not enabling it, and it's nowhere near a distinction without a difference.

And there is no way you could possibly not know that.

#34 | Posted by eberly at 2025-09-30 05:56 PM

" If you vote for someone, then they say something stupid or harmful, you didn't sign a contract that obligates you to denounce it."

You did if you're already denouncing the same (or less severe) actions by the other party.

It's like Gunga Belle SCREECHING about censorship under Biden, yet staying dead silent while Trump ACTIVELY censors.

#35 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-09-30 06:00 PM

-You did if you're already denouncing the same (or less severe) actions by the other party.

Not really. It just reveals me to be a hypocrite.

-It's like Gunga Belle SCREECHING about censorship under Biden, yet staying dead silent while Trump ACTIVELY censors.

Hypocrisy.

It's not calling for it to happen.

#36 | Posted by eberly at 2025-09-30 06:02 PM

That's because I plonked him over a year ago.

#33 | POSTED BY DANFORTH AT 2025-09-30 05:56 PM |

If you did, it was quietly. And you never scolded others for enabling it. You're still an idiot.

#37 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2025-09-30 06:27 PM

i demand you be upset by posts you cant read.

-lefthandturd

#38 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-09-30 07:04 PM

now funny flag me and run away, stupid.

#39 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-09-30 07:05 PM

@#36 ... It's not calling for it to happen. ...

Silence is acceptance.


Just look at the current GOP in Congress.


#40 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-09-30 07:29 PM

" If you did, it was quietly"

What a riot.

Tell me you have no defense for your enabling without using those specific words.

#41 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-09-30 07:59 PM

" It just reveals me to be a hypocrite."

Yes.

Yes it does.

Same with every other screecher under Biden, silent when confronted with WORSE.

#42 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-09-30 08:01 PM

Trump fueled people disappointed with their miserable lives with anger at immigrants.

Read anything they post, it all boils down to a common hate for others.

This is why Deplorable Trumping MAGAts are so shocked Trump's policies are hurting them.

This is why the military being sent to democratic cities is a good distraction.

In the end, it's all just a distraction from the fact that Trump is a pedophile and on the Epstein list.

#43 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-09-30 08:15 PM


That's because I plonked him over a year ago.
#33 | POSTED BY DANFORTH

Why? Why did you "plonk" him ?

Ignorance isn't an excuse.


i demand you be upset by posts you cant read.
-lefthandturd
#38 | POSTED BY ALEXANDRITE

@#36 ... It's not calling for it to happen. ...
Silence is acceptance.

See ... Gaslighter with the save.

#44 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-09-30 08:33 PM

"I demand you screen for anything objectionable and renounce what was said by half of all politicians."

-Alexhandjob

#45 | Posted by eberly at 2025-09-30 08:44 PM

-Alexhandjob

#45 | Posted by eberly at 2025-09-30 08:44 PM | Reply | Flag

FF!
LMAO

#46 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2025-09-30 08:49 PM

now funny flag me and run away, stupid.

#39 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-09-30 07:05 PM | Reply | Flag:

K, but #45 was the schitt!

#47 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2025-09-30 08:50 PM

@#41 ... Tell me you have no defense for your enabling without using those specific words. ...

Yup.

The abject silence of the Republican-controlled Congress seems to be giving a pass to the actions of Pres Trump.


#48 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-09-30 08:53 PM

I can't see 45, so it's either Legallystupid or Me Me mEberly.

#49 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-09-30 09:06 PM

@#46 ... LMAO ...

MedBed.

#50 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-09-30 09:42 PM

... and what about the topic of this thread ...

... The column, by editor at large Geoffrey Ingersoll, calls for "blood in the streets" in response to violence against conservatives. ...

So, an apparent call for violence?

By whom?

#51 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-09-30 09:50 PM

"And there's A WORLD of difference between a poster in a political chat room and an entire political party."

Virulent Dem rhetoric has been non-stop amped up to 11 and you never say a damn thing about the people you are enabling who are doing it.

#52 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-09-30 10:59 PM

@#52 ... Virulent Dem rhetoric has been non-stop amped up to 11 and you never say a damn thing about the people you are enabling who are doing it. ...

So, your current trolling seems to admit it has nothing beside, well, the phlegm it coughs up?


#53 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-09-30 11:51 PM

I don't cough up phlegm. I remove it from my body.

#54 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-09-30 11:55 PM

Drudge Retort Headlines

John Roberts Wrote Trump a Permission Slip to Indict Comey (39 comments)

Trump Blames FBI for His Insurrection (30 comments)

Doctors Tested a Common Drug on COVID. Results Are Stunning (23 comments)

Trump Announces 100% Tariff on Foreign-made Movies (21 comments)

Eric Adams Drops Out of New York City Mayoral Race (18 comments)

Trump Golf Getaway Hits Taxpayers with Heavy Price Tag (17 comments)

5 Reasons the Supreme Court Might Change Its Mind on Same-Sex Marriage (15 comments)

Trump and MAGA Coming for WNBA Next (15 comments)

Shooting at Texas Kickapoo Casino (15 comments)

Trump Promotes MedBed Conspiracy (14 comments)