E1,

"His hand-picked justices were chosen to rubber-stamp anything Trump wanted."

Spare me. Hillary Clinton would have done exactly the same thing, just in the opposite ideological direction. That's how Supreme Court nominations work, whether people admit it or not.

The difference is the downstream impact of a Hillary win. Under a Democratic presidency, cultural policy would not have evolved naturally. Instead it would have been imposed through social and corporate pressure, as had already begun.

Women would have been expected to silently accept biological males in women's bathrooms and women's sports, regardless of fairness or safety. Decades of progress for female athletes would have been sacrificed in the name of a peculiar ideological compliance.

On that issue alone, Trump served as a necessary obstacle to liberal insanity.

Doc,

"Do you mean, as you'd wished/preferred?"

No. This has nothing to do with what I wish or prefer.

It's about maintaining a basic social contract that's existed for ages in civilized societies until modern liberals decided they were smarter than everyone who came before them.

Men use men's restrooms.

Women use women's restrooms.

Private spaces are respected.

That worked just fine until kooks decided normal boundaries were "oppressive" and started demanding everyone else play along with their latest demonstration of being nuts.

When I said "evolved," I meant not blowing up a stable norm to satisfy fringe activist fantasies.

Pretending that basic separation of private space is some kind of moral failure is liberal nonsense.

Doc,

Before you point out the obvious, yes I know, transgenders have been around for ages too and have blended in using the restroom that more fits their appearance.

But it all changed when it became political. I never heard anyone complaining during my lifetime about this. But now it's become a major topic discussion as liberals wanted it.

When all this blew up in the media, I posted that transgenders will rue the day liberals turned their quite, private world into a media circus.

Now laws will need passed to shut up the kooks.

Hugh,

"A few people are concentrating more and more wealth in their greedy hands"

I agree that concentration of wealth is a travesty and setting the stage for a serious major revolt in the future.

However....that's because of the Supreme Court?

Dan,

"You turned against Democrats the day gay marriage became legal."

Two of the upcoming three seats in the Supreme Court coming open, the next president would be able to nominate their own selection. Two had been nominated by Reagan so they would be replaced with judges nominated by Hillary.

If the current court passed Gay Marriage, replacing those seats with judges nominated by Hillary, would make the court more liberal.

The Supreme Court could more easily pass whatever liberals wanted such as a transgender case.

You can say passing Gay Marriage had something to do with my voting for Trump, but it wasn't that I took issue with Gay Marriage.

Turning against Democrats happened more slowly and wasn't a single event but voting for Trump was more tied to wanting to see a republican fill the upcoming 3 seats.

Dan,

"Like equality"

You don't care how women feel about it?

The public had mostly not thought about transgender "rights" but they have since been illuminated to the subject.

I don't see how you can say the word "equality" with a straight face with all the problems trying to accommodate them.

Dress how you want if its appropriate for the setting, but stop trying to say you have actually become the other sex and expecting society to participate in the fantasy.

This is making democrats look like lunatics.

Truth,

"Why is the reaction to a possible discussion about bathroom etiquette resulting in trans people losing healthcare rights?"

I don't see any connection between toilets and healthcare.

Concerning trans healthcare, I think minors are a big topic and rightfully so. Minors can't make that decision and adults shouldn't make it for them.

As for adults, this looks to me more like plastic surgery which is generally not covered unless it's life threatening.

Using the argument, "I'm going to kill myself if I don't get it" should be treated as a mental health crisis and be addressed through psychiatric care.

We could play this all night and I don't feel like it again.

Just the same old rhetoric. Nothing new.