For the record

In the documents released there were credible claims that a French businessman was supplying Epstein with children as young as 8

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH
JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM
BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
Case No. :50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Plaintiff,
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and
BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually,
Defendants,
STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS

Bradley Edwards was an attorney in a civil case against Epstein

Maxwell is not the only important witness to lie to avoid deposition by Edwards. Upon review of the message pads that were taken from Epstein's home in the police trash pulls,
see Exhibit "J" supra, many were from Jean Luc Brunel, a French citizen and one of Epstein's closest pals. He left messages for Epstein.

One dated 4/1/05 said, "He has a teacher for you to teach you how to speak Russian. She is 2x8 years old, not blonde. Lessons are free and you can have your 1st today if you call."

Nope it's about obfuscation.

It is about confusing the discussion with irrelevant pedantry like arguing over words. I mean he wasn't having sex with infants, so he really wasn't a pedophile, he was more into 'barely legal" you know the sort that you find on pornhub so when you think about it Epstein really wasn't that bad, I mean who among us hasn't lusted after a nubile 15-year-old. I mean look at them they have ----- after all. Moving on to "just asking questions" did Epstein REALLY do what they said he did? Clinton certainly did. But really, what is "rape"? Is statutory rape, really rape? or is it just an arbitrary rule man, and aren't rules made to be broken? Didn't the girls, I mean, women, ------? How could that be rape if the women ------ed? moving onto to outright gaslighting. And there were other women there, like Maxwell, how dangerous could it be for the women, really? And then once the women reached this arbitrary date of "18" well they were free to have sex with whomever they chose, so they chose the middle and old aged friends of Epstein, is THAT a crime? And if THAT wasn't a crime, there really wasn't a pedophilia ring, was there. I mean how could it be a "ring" when there was just one "bad guy" who, really did he do anything "REALLY WRONG"? After all they came to him and they all said Trump was a gentleman, does that sound like a ring?

I've always understood a pedophile as one who sexually preys upon pre-pubescent children. Post puberty I've always understood to be statutory rape, at best, if not outright rape. It's all beyond disgusting and come with large crim8nal Pe tap ties if convicted

#31 | Posted by BellRinger a

I wasn't using legal definitions. Well, not exactly. I used both psychological and legal. I agree with what you typed.

#39 | Posted by BellRinger a

You're implication is, like Kelly's, that Epstein isn't technically a pedophile

When that obviously is not the point

I refuted that with evidence that Epstein WAS a pedophile in 37 and 41 above

And I explained why, like Kelly, you are doing this.

To obfuscate the horror of what he did to hundreds of children.

In the belief that will help -------

You're lying and a piece of ----

I'm a borderline Hall of Fame troll, Alexandrite. I easily elicit multiple responses with a single post. And it doesn't take any effort.
#27 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-04-06 05:42 PM

just a reminder