@#8 ... This will really test the DOJ ...

Why?

(serious question)

That aside... I guess my first question might be, did he really lie? Or has the Committee misrepresented what he has said.

If he did lie to Congress, then I'd support him facing the consequences of that.

But before we go there, it really needs to be determined whether or not he lied.

Cart before the horse and all that.

@#10 ... Jeff's "Chinese" alter ego is just as stupid as he is. ...

One thing I learned when I ran a message board.

If a person is willing to create a second alias, then that person is likely to also create multiple (many?) other aliases.

I will say again, infinite kudos to RCade for dealing with all this on such an august message board.

@#16 ... By claiming repeatedly that the documents case against him is legit? ...

Yeah, as if those declarations mean anything in the context of all the other comments your current alias posts.

Stated differently, your current alias' goal here seems to be more disruptive than informative.

@#19 ... Oh gee. I'm so sorry for challenging cherished leftist narratives. I'll try to be better. ...

Don't try to be better.

Do try to provide substantiation for what your current alias posts.

Be informative, not disruptive.

That's all I am saying. :)