Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Wednesday, June 26, 2024

Judge Aileen Cannon is considering throwing out a collection of sealed notes on Trump's behavior that practically prove that he knowingly stole and withheld classified documents from the U.S. government after he left office.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Judge Fangirl is helping the orange traitor in running out the clock by slow walking hearings on objections that have been already ruled on by other courts.

#1 | Posted by Nixon at 2024-06-26 10:31 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 3

One thing that is always said but is wrong is that Trump took the documents to Mar-a-lago. He didn't, National Archives did. It was always that they had GSA rent a secure facility in the hometown of the former President , deliver all the documents, and then the former President, under security, would go through the boxes and sort out what he would take and what he would leave. Obama-Chicago, Bush-Houston, etc. Why would the National archives handle this on differently? Makes you want to say Hmmmmmm.

#2 | Posted by fishpaw at 2024-06-26 12:54 PM | Reply | Funny: 5

#2 Which right wing website published that disinformation?

#3 | Posted by snoofy at 2024-06-26 01:01 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Fact check: Debunking Trump's blizzard of dishonesty about his federal indictment
www.cnn.com

Trump's dealings with the National Archives and Records Administration
In the Georgia speech, Trump made this claim: "As a former president, we were negotiating with the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), just as every other president has done, and the next thing I knew, Mar-a-Lago was raided by gun-toting FBI agents."

Facts First: These claims, too, are false in one way and highly misleading in another. It's not true that Trump was negotiating "just as every other president has done"; no other ex-president since the Presidential Records Act took effect with President Ronald Reagan's records in the 1980s has engaged in anything like Trump's protracted post-presidency refusal to return official documents sought by NARA " which the Presidential Records Act requires to be in NARA's custody and control the moment a president leaves office.

#4 | Posted by snoofy at 2024-06-26 01:03 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

@#2 ... One thing that is always said but is wrong is that Trump took the documents to Mar-a-lago. He didn't, National Archives did. ...

Got a link for that?

#5 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-06-26 02:15 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

@#4 ... n the Georgia speech, Trump made this claim: "As a former president, we were negotiating with the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), just as every other president has done, and the next thing I knew, Mar-a-Lago was raided by gun-toting FBI agents." ...

Timeline of the Trump Documents Inquiry (September 2022)
www.voanews.com

... Below is a timeline of key events in the probe:

January 20, 2021

Trump departs the White House as Democrat Joe Biden is sworn in as the nation's 46th president and heads to his private Florida estate known as Mar-a-Lago.

May 2021

The National Archives and Records Administration, also known as NARA, emails Trump's lawyers, notifying them that some two dozen boxes of original records were not turned over, according to The Washington Post.

December 2021

A Trump representative tells the National Archives "that they had located some records," according to a statement published later by the National Archives.

Mid-January 2022

The National Archives retrieves 15 boxes of presidential records from Trump's estate.

The nonpartisan presidential records agency said it "identified items marked as classified national security information, up to the level of Top Secret and including Sensitive Compartmented Information and Special Access Program materials" and sought permission to alert the FBI.

February 8, 2022

The National Archives issues a public statement saying it is still searching for more of Trump's presidential records, one day after The Washington Post reported the boxes were retrieved from Florida.

...

February 18, 2022

The National Archives tells Congress that Trump took classified information to his Florida home after leaving the White House.

April 7, 2022

Sources confirm to Reuters that the U.S. Justice Department was investigating Trump's removal of official presidential records from the White House.

...

June 3, 2022

A Trump representative, whose name is redacted in the Justice Department filing, asserts that "a diligent search" was conducted for documents at Mar-a-Lago removed from the White House and that "any and all responsive documents accompany this certification."

August 8, 2022

Federal agents execute a search warrant at Trump's Florida property, uncovering 13 boxes or containers with documents marked classified " "more than twice the amount produced June 3 in response to the grand jury subpoena." Trump was not at the property at the time, and media reports showed him at Trump Tower in Manhattan.

A photo released in a court filing later that month shows some of the seized documents with clear markings of "Top Secret" and "Secret."

Trump, in a post online, says the records were "all declassified" and placed in "secure storage." A day later, Trump, who continues to hint at a possible 2024 run for the presidency, cites the FBI search in a campaign fundraising appeal.

August 12, 2022

The FBI's search warrant is released to the public following approval by U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart.

...

September 2, 2022

The FBI reveals in a court filing that it recovered more than 11,000 government documents and photographs during the August 8 search of Trump's estate, as well as 48 empty folders labeled as "classified."

U.S. judge agrees to appoint special master in Trump search case. ...


#6 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-06-26 02:19 PM | Reply

"Got a link for that?"

LOL!!!!!

#7 | Posted by Angrydad at 2024-06-26 02:36 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

Why would the National archives handle this on differently? Makes you want to say Hmmmmmm.

#2 | Posted by fishpaw

Maybe because the administration was in the middle of attempting a coup and people were fleeing the sinking ship?

#8 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2024-06-26 04:53 PM | Reply

I'll wager that a few minutes after Judge Cannon throws out the documents case, that Jack Smith will appeal, the Cannon order will be stayed by the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, and Smith will file new charges, with new evidence, in another venue. The new filings will be dealt with in a court of law, not one of personal opinion run by a Trump toady.

And that, kids, is how the special counsel brought down an ex-president...

#9 | Posted by catdog at 2024-06-26 04:59 PM | Reply

Why would the National archives handle this on differently? Makes you want to say Hmmmmmm.

#2 | Posted by fishpaw

The question is why would Trumpy force everyone around him to handle things "differently"?

Because criminally negligent twice impeached Convicted Felon Trumpy has no respect for the law or tradition or protocol and he didn't have a clue how the government was supposed to function so he just made it up as he went along. That's why.

Everything he did was "unprecedented ".

And now you are seeing the results of that criminally negligent incompetence.

#10 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-06-26 05:10 PM | Reply | Funny: 1 | Newsworthy 1

One thing that is always said but is wrong is that Trump took the documents to Mar-a-lago. He didn't, National Archives did.

#2 | Posted by fishpaw

There are pictures of Trump aides loading 'banker boxes' full of documents onto a private jet.

OCU

#11 | Posted by OCUser at 2024-06-26 05:19 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 4

One thing that is always said but is wrong is that Trump took the documents to Mar-a-lago. He didn't, National Archives did. It was always that they had GSA rent a secure facility in the hometown of the former President , deliver all the documents, and then the former President, under security, would go through the boxes and sort out what he would take and what he would leave. Obama-Chicago, Bush-Houston, etc. Why would the National archives handle this on differently? Makes you want to say Hmmmmmm.
#2 | POSTED BY FISHPAW

The statement that "Trump didn't take the documents to Mar-a-Lago; the National Archives did" is inaccurate. The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) did not transport the documents to Mar-a-Lago. Instead, NARA retrieved 15 boxes of records from Mar-a-Lago in January 2022, which included classified materials.

The claim that NARA typically rents a secure facility in the former president's hometown for sorting documents is also not supported by the facts. NARA clarified that there is no history, practice, or legal provision for presidents to take official records with them to sort through after leaving office. The Presidential Records Act mandates that all presidential records must be handed over to NARA at the end of a president's term.

Therefore, the assertion that NARA handled Trump's documents differently compared to other former presidents like Obama or Bush is incorrect.

www.cnn.com
www.cbsnews.com
www.archives.gov

Damn you dumb.

Swallow it.

#12 | Posted by rstybeach11 at 2024-06-26 05:43 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 6

@#12

Do not forget, the huge issue in this case is not whether or not fmr Pres Trump took the documents, or even that he had the documents at Mar-A-Lago. Those aspects are a lame deflection attempts from the central issue in this case.

The central issue is that he allegedly refused to return the documents to their proper owner when asked. Multiple times he was asked to return them.

Finally, a search warrant was needed.

See #6 for the details.


#13 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-06-26 06:46 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

#13 | POSTED BY LAMPLIGHTER

This, I know.

#14 | Posted by rstybeach11 at 2024-06-26 07:55 PM | Reply

@#14 ... This, I know. ...

Apologies, it was not directed at you, even though that is the comment I replied to.

I've stated that many times previously, but I thought it worth another repeat anyway for others who have posted on this thread and do not seem to be able to learn, e.g., #2.



#15 | Posted by lamplighter at 2024-06-26 08:21 PM | Reply

"that practically prove"

Almost.... almost... so close...

Always some BS with the most of you.

#16 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2024-06-26 08:46 PM | Reply

@#16 ... Always some BS with the most of you. ...

What BS?

Please be specific, links would be nice as well.


#17 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-06-26 08:54 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

"Please be specific, links would be nice as well."

LOL!!!

Yer a riot, dude.

#18 | Posted by Angrydad at 2024-06-26 09:40 PM | Reply

@#18 ... Yer a riot, dude. ...

I try.

At least give me some credit for the attempt, no matter how futile the attempt may be.

One time, yeah, just one time, I hope for some glimmer of understanding from the alias I reply to.

Yeah, most likely futile, from what I've seen.

But sometimes it is appropriate to expose the likely intentional ignorance of some folk.



#19 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-06-26 09:56 PM | Reply

Re 12

NW

Unfortunately ... You can reveal the facts to him with links and circles and arrows and diagrams ( with footnotes a glossary and an index) until the cows come home but he will just be back tomorrow in another thread spouting the same old tired lies.

It is the Way.

The MAGA Way.

#20 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-06-26 10:51 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 3

When it comes to Trump does anyone actually pay any attention to words from MSM? They love Biden and hate Trump.

#21 | Posted by Robson at 2024-06-27 07:23 PM | Reply

How about someone looks into the biden family 'damning' information:

scontent-dfw5-1.xx.fbcdn.net

#22 | Posted by MSgt at 2024-06-28 12:55 AM | Reply

What is this, national treasure? "It's a clue in these secret notes, if we just had the cypher key we could prove everything!"

#23 | Posted by THEBULL at 2024-06-28 06:57 AM | Reply

hate Trump.

#21 | POSTED BY ROBSON

What's there not to hate?

I mean, seriously?

I've called you stupid. You are.

#24 | Posted by Zed at 2024-06-28 07:52 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Judge Aileen Cannon is considering throwing out a collection of sealed notes on Trump's behavior that practically prove that he knowingly stole and withheld classified documents from the U.S. government after he left office.

She won't do it because that is an appealable judgement. And, you can be certain that any opportunity Jack Smith has to appeal one of her judgements will include a motion to have her dismissed from the case. That is partly why she has delayed issuing any opinion that is appealable.

I originally though that her short comings were due to inexperience and/or incompetence. My opinion has now changed to the point that I now believe that she is biased in Trump's favor.

#25 | Posted by FedUpWithPols at 2024-06-28 12:49 PM | Reply

...My opinion has now changed to the point that I now believe that she is biased in Trump's favor.

#25 | Posted by FedUpWithPols

YOU THINK!!!!

OCU

#26 | Posted by OCUser at 2024-06-28 03:44 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2024 World Readable

Drudge Retort