Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Tuesday, September 03, 2024

Democratic leaders on the House Oversight Committee released a letter Tuesday asking former president Donald Trump if he ever illegally received money from the government of Egypt, and whether money from Cairo played a role in a $10 million infusion into his 2016 run for president.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Rep. Jamie Raskin (Md.), the ranking Democrat on the committee, and Rep. Robert Garcia (Calif.), the top Democrat on its subcommittee for national security, the border and foreign affairs, wrote to Trump that they were making the request as a result of a Washington Post article published last month.

"Surely you would agree that the American people deserve to know whether a former president - and a current candidate for president - took an illegal campaign contribution from a brutal foreign dictator," the letter signed by the two Democrats reads. "Accordingly, we request that you immediately provide the Committee with information and documents necessary to assure the Committee and the American public that you never, directly or indirectly, politically or personally, received any fund from the Egyptian president or government."

Trump campaign officials did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The Trump campaign declined to answer detailed questions from The Post for the story last month but said the Justice Department investigation found no wrongdoing and was closed.

In early 2019, as Mueller was preparing to deliver his report on Russian interference and close his office, his team obtained records from Egyptian banking officials. The records revealed a cash withdrawal of nearly $10 million - an amount almost identical to what the intelligence indicated - from an account tied to the Egyptian General Intelligence Service, The Post reported. The withdrawal occurred in January 2017, five days before Trump took office.

The discovery intensified the probe. Prosecutors in the U.S. attorney's office in D.C. who took over the case from Mueller proposed subpoenaing Trump's bank records from a period that included Trump's first months in the White House to see if any of the money from Cairo could be seen landing in Trump's accounts, The Post reported.

But months after the handoff, The Post's investigation found, prosecutors and FBI agents were blocked by top Justice Department officials from obtaining those records. The case ground to a halt by the fall of 2019 as Trump's then-attorney general, William P. Barr, raised doubts about whether there was sufficient evidence to continue the probe. Michael Sherwin, the then-acting U.S. attorney who closed the case, told The Post he did so for lack of evidence.

WTAF...lack of evidence when investigators were denied access to Trump's bank records to see if any of the money was actually there?!?!

There simply is no bottom to Trump's corruption of America's government in service of his own greed and avarice. Trump's DOJ really was his personal defense team and it will only get worse if he gets another try at it.

#1 | Posted by tonyroma at 2024-09-03 01:14 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 3

But.. but... but.. Hunter Biden!! Squaaaak!

#2 | Posted by Whatsleft at 2024-09-03 01:24 PM | Reply | Funny: 3

Look into the $2 billion given to Slumlord Jared and Sweatshop Barbie.

#3 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2024-09-04 12:20 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 4

Why did this take 4 years to come out?

#4 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2024-09-04 12:29 AM | Reply

"Why did this take 4 years to come out?"

It's sort of like toothpaste though. Even wnen the tube is nearly empty and it's really difficult to get it out of the tube it's still going to be exponentially harder to put it back in the tube. I don't see this being forgotten or going away and could accepting this money be construed as part of the President's official duties? Someone go change Donald's diaper it's suddebly stinking up Mara Lago!

#5 | Posted by danni at 2024-09-04 01:16 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 3

The problem, Danni, is that only half of the nation even cares anymore.
The GOP stooges will forgive Donald for anything. He was right when he
said he could 'shoot a person in Central Park or Time Square, and still not
lose any followers'.

They are in a cult. He is 'Dear Leader'. No matter how bad he flubs up,
or what crazy comes out of his mouth, 40% of Americans will look the other
way and still pull the lever for the man come election day. And not getting
a result they like, a firm 20% will likely march on Washington again.

America needs to be READY FOR IT this time...

#6 | Posted by earthmuse at 2024-09-04 06:32 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 6

Sh*tler ain't going to answer it.

#7 | Posted by Nixon at 2024-09-04 07:18 AM | Reply | Funny: 1 | Newsworthy 2

Notice how crybaby Jeff is whining about lawfare on other threads but conveniently ignores Trump's crimes?

#8 | Posted by Sycophant at 2024-09-04 10:22 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

"House Dems Ask Trump If He Illegally Took $10M from Egypt"

What did he say?

#9 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2024-09-04 03:13 PM | Reply

#3 | Posted by reinheitsgebot

And the impossible to get Trademarks from China...

#10 | Posted by GalaxiePete at 2024-09-04 03:57 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

What did he say?

He said he could shoot someone on 5th avenue and not lose any of you Deplorable Trumping MAGAts.

#11 | Posted by ClownShack at 2024-09-04 04:18 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

Bribes to pols are now okay, per SCOTUS. (And payoffs to members of the Court? Fuhgedaboudit.)

#12 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2024-09-05 06:43 AM | Reply

America needs to be READY FOR IT this time...

Sh*tler won't be able to block the National Guard this time.

#13 | Posted by Nixon at 2024-09-05 07:33 AM | Reply

What did he say?

#9 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRDS

He will not answer that question without a subpoena that he will then refuse to respond to and then appeal up to the Supreme Court first. Expect an answer in about 3-4 years. If he loses the election. If he wins you will never hear about it again.

#14 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-09-05 12:55 PM | Reply

What did he say?

#9 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRDS

Update:

Since the House cannot issue a subpoena he will just not respond.

#15 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-09-05 01:00 PM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2024 World Readable

Drudge Retort