Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Friday, March 15, 2024

A Fulton County judge ruled Friday that District Attorney Fani Willis and her office may remain on the 2020 election case involving former President Donald Trump and his allies if Nathan Wade, the special prosecutor who was in a romantic relationship with Willis, steps aside.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Now that this sideshow is over, let's get on with the trial.

#1 | Posted by Zed at 2024-03-15 09:48 AM | Reply

Uhhh not exactly what the judge said ... They can stay if loverboy gets booted. Let's not forget to omit that key detail.

#2 | Posted by Bluewaffles at 2024-03-15 09:55 AM | Reply

That was for Zed btw, QCP has their article correct.

#3 | Posted by Bluewaffles at 2024-03-15 09:56 AM | Reply

The required "punishment" for the critics, and no practical impact to the case. Hopefully Willis also learned a little bit from this self-inflicted injury. The law was met and followed, but appearances can still undermine even the most honest efforts.

#4 | Posted by YAV at 2024-03-15 10:00 AM | Reply

BTW - the judge was clear: No conflict of interest was demonstrated. He also doesn't take any swipes at Willis, but he does against Wade. That's why the choice was to separated Wade from the case.

#5 | Posted by YAV at 2024-03-15 10:08 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Willis should accept Wade's resignation and then recuse herself from the case and let another prosecutor from her office handle it, assuming she can find someone willing to do so, knowing they will become the next target of Trump, his team and MAGA voters:

Andrew Weissmann (weissmann11 on Threads)
@AWeissmann_
For the good of the case, given that ethics issues will abound now as to Willis, she should voluntarily recuse herself from the case and allow another prosecutor to oversee the GA trump case.

Joyce Alene
@JoyceWhiteVance

The Judge's ruling means Willis's entire office is NOT recused from the case. But the better path forward would be to let another prosecutor in that office take over, as @AWeissmann_ points out.

#6 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2024-03-15 10:53 AM | Reply

I'd refuse to further the case and resign. But that's just me.

#7 | Posted by fresno500 at 2024-03-15 10:59 AM | Reply

That would be the cleanest way forward, and it will make no difference in the Trump teams approach. They will still go after the entire office saying the entire prosecution was corrupted from the start. There is no 'winning' by capitulating and taking the 'high' road.

I deeply and sincerely appreciate both Weissmann and Vance on legal matters, but when it comes to political analysis I would look elsewhere.

#8 | Posted by YAV at 2024-03-15 11:01 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Yav, I think their recommendation goes beyond political calculations:

Anna Bower
@AnnaBower
This graf in McAfee's opinion caught my eye.

Even if the Georgia court of appeals were to find on appeal that an appearance of impropriety is enough to disqualify Willis, this leaves open possibility that her line prosecutors could continue with the case so long as she recuses.

twitter.com

#9 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2024-03-15 11:07 AM | Reply

OTOH, Kreis, who knows GA the best, thinks her recusal would result in the whole office being recused:

Anthony Michael Kreis
@AnthonyMKreis
I think this would be a de facto disqualification under Georgia law that would require her entire office to be removed the same as if Judge McAfee had found an actual conflict of interest. Won't happen. And would open the door to more litigation about re: constitutional officers.

twitter.com

If she could do so without jeopardizing the whole case, I think she should, but if that is not the case, then she should stay, which I think she will do anyway. I don't see her backing down now unless she is forced to.

#10 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2024-03-15 11:12 AM | Reply

It's just SO hard to believe that BlueTide was dead wrong about this yet again, rofl.

#11 | Posted by Corky at 2024-03-15 11:20 AM | Reply

I wasn't wrong Corky, either she gets the boot or he gets the boot. The decision gets left up to the two of them which I think is hilarious.

#12 | Posted by Bluewaffles at 2024-03-15 11:34 AM | Reply

Uhhh not exactly what the judge said ...

The judge never said it was a sideshow.

But we can all clearly see that it was.

It was just an attempt by Trumpy to avoid being held accountable by muddying the waters and deflecting and distracting and delaying the case against Trumpy in any way possible or even better have it dismissed.

You see it's ok for Republicans and or Trumpers to be biased and to have all kinds of appearances of conflicts of interest and improprieties or corrupt relationships and to delay and obstruct justice and even associate with Russian spies.

But if Dems even remotely appear to have conflicts (even if they don't but just appear to) it is a cardinal sin and everything stops and must be adjudicated and/or investigated and they must recuse or even resign.

See Clarence Thomas for further details.

#13 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-03-15 11:41 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

@#2 ... Uhhh not exactly what the judge said ... ...

Trump's Georgia case can continue if Willis or special prosecutor leave: judge
www.axios.com

...
- - -Judge Scott McAfee said he found the "appearance of impropriety" but ruled that the relationship brought no actual conflict of interest and denied the defendants' claims and requests.

- - -However, he stipulated that the relationship requires either Willis or Wade to leave the case. ...



#14 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-03-15 11:42 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

@#14

forgot to add... [emphasis mine]

#15 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-03-15 11:43 AM | Reply

- I wasn't wrong

It's okay gang, when Fani gets her Fanny canned from the case it'll be over. I'll make sure to post that story too when it happens.

POSTED BY BLUEWAFFLES AT 2024-03-13 03:33 PM

She hasn't gotten canned, won't be canned, and he wasn't part of your comments.

So I guess you won't be posting that story either.

#16 | Posted by Corky at 2024-03-15 12:25 PM | Reply

Pwned.

#17 | Posted by YAV at 2024-03-15 12:31 PM | Reply

Corky collects a scalp.

#18 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2024-03-15 12:40 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 3

Oh Corky ... she'll have to can herself or can her lover. Her career is already ruined which is all that really matters.

#19 | Posted by Bluewaffles at 2024-03-15 12:43 PM | Reply | Funny: 2 | Newsworthy 1

"all that really matters"

Corrupt to your core.

#20 | Posted by YAV at 2024-03-15 12:50 PM | Reply

@#19 ... which is all that really matters ...

For me, all that really matters is that fr Pres Trump, et al, are able to have their day(s) in court, face the evidence, present their case, and have a judgement (innocent or guilty) rendered.

If fmr Pres Trump is an innocent as he says he is and the charges against him are as fake as he says they are, then why does he appear to be so afraid of saying so in a Court of Law?


#21 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-03-15 12:56 PM | Reply

And yet Unkie Thomas, Alito and Roberts are allowed to rule on cases that are brought by plaintiffs WHO DIRECTLY BRIBED THEM.

There's GQP lack of ethics and morals at work.

#22 | Posted by Nixon at 2024-03-15 12:56 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

...then why does he appear to be so afraid of saying so in a Court of Law?

Perhaps because a Court of Law usually comes with a -------- detector?

#23 | Posted by REDIAL at 2024-03-15 01:01 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

- the case it'll be over

Oh, and wrong about that, too.

Which, really, is the most important part. Even though people like you and Trump think you are the most important part.

#24 | Posted by Corky at 2024-03-15 01:15 PM | Reply

Trump FREAKS OUT after Georgia Judges Rules AGAINST HIM

www.youtube.com

Then he starts begging for money.

#25 | Posted by Corky at 2024-03-15 01:28 PM | Reply

Her (Willis) career is already ruined which is all that really matters.

#19 | POSTED BY BLUEWAFFLES

I don't know why you say that.

Has there been any low, stinking thing Trump has done that has ruined his career?

You've bragged about that from time to time.

Maybe Willis will take a page from Trump's book and run for president.

Successfully.

#26 | Posted by Zed at 2024-03-15 01:39 PM | Reply

Zed, not if Kamala had anything to say about.

#27 | Posted by Bluewaffles at 2024-03-15 01:40 PM | Reply

Then he starts begging for money.

Has he ever stopped begging for money? I'm surprised he hasn't sent Uday and Qusay out to squeegee windshields.

#28 | Posted by REDIAL at 2024-03-15 01:52 PM | Reply | Funny: 1 | Newsworthy 1

Zed, not if Kamala had anything to say about.

#27 | POSTED BY BLUEWAFFLES

I have to believe that you deliberately evade the point of everything.

The point is that, once again, a "man" (Trump) who has absolutely no code of behavior is beating someone else over the head with morality.

Do you do the same thing? I have to believe this is another quality of MAGA.

#29 | Posted by Zed at 2024-03-15 01:58 PM | Reply


www.fox5atlanta.com

... Furthermore - and of greater importance - the Court finds, largely based on the District Attorney's testimony, that the evidence demonstrated the financial gain stemming from her relationship with Wade was not a motivating factor for the District Attorney to indict and prosecute this case.

While a general motive for increased income cannot be entirely disregarded, the District Attorney was not financially destitute during this time or in dire need, as her salary exceeds $200,000 per year without any indication of excessive expenses or debts.

Likewise, the Court finds that the Defendants have failed to show that the District Attorney's conduct influenced the case to their detriment. ...

In summary, the District Attorney did not act in a manner consistent with the theory that she orchestrated a financial scheme to enrich herself (or gain favor with Wade) by prolonging this prosecution or engaging in excessive litigation. ...

#30 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-03-15 02:23 PM | Reply

Then he starts begging for money.

#25 | Posted by Corky at 2024-03-15 01:28 PM | Reply | F

Well he won't have access to Troth Social in prison so....

#31 | Posted by Nixon at 2024-03-15 02:30 PM | Reply

The judge didn't use the word "resign." He said "leave the case."

Willis could turn the case over to an Assistant D.A. . . . or she could continue on the case as D.A. and appoint a different prosecutor. There is more than just one qualified prosecutor in the D.A.'s office. Perhaps even one who has been working closely with Wade and does not need to be brought up to speed.

It eems to me that Judge McAfee left the decision up to Willis and Wade to do what is in the best interest of their case.

The motion to dismiss the case was denied. One way or the other, the case can finally go forward.

Half a loaf isn't exactly what Trump and his co-defendants wanted to hear. I'm sure they have other motions in the hopper.

#32 | Posted by Twinpac at 2024-03-15 02:31 PM | Reply

Trump FREAKS OUT after Georgia Judges Rules AGAINST HIM

That was his one shot.... to get her kicked off the case so the Gov can appoint a loyal trumpturd to run it and slow walk it to death.

Chalk up YET ANOTHER L FOR LEWZER.

#33 | Posted by Nixon at 2024-03-15 02:32 PM | Reply

Willis is also being badgered by Gym Jordon with a subpoena for documents for a misuse of government grant money that never happened. Apparently two employees in the D.A. office had a scheme to misdirect a grant in the amount of $488,000. When it was brought to Willis' attention, at least one of the employees was fired and unceremoniously escorted out of the office by several law enforcement officers. That disgruntled employee took her story to Gym Jordan claiming herself to be a whistleblower.

No funds were misdirected or used for any purpose other than intended.

Gym Jordan is trying to help Trump by making a federal case against Willis based on the lies of a so-called whistleblower.

#34 | Posted by Twinpac at 2024-03-15 03:10 PM | Reply

Nathan Wade steps down after judge rules on Fani Willis disqualification motions
www.fox5atlanta.com

... A few hours later, Nathan Wade resigned his position as a special prosecutor on the Georgia election interference case on Friday afternoon. ...

#35 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-03-15 03:27 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Which means the case against the Election Rigger Trump will proceed immediately.

#36 | Posted by Corky at 2024-03-15 04:01 PM | Reply

trump fails again.

#37 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2024-03-15 04:02 PM | Reply

Gym Jordan is trying to help Trump by making a federal case against Willis based on the lies of a so-called whistleblower.
Have they ever had a legitimate whistleblower? Ever? Wow. I knew that particular witness had a vendetta, that was obvious, but misdirecting half a million?

#38 | Posted by YAV at 2024-03-15 04:50 PM | Reply

They don't need a legitimate whistle blower.

Republicans are shortsighted and currently all their sights are set on installing Trump in November and ending American democracy.

#39 | Posted by ClownShack at 2024-03-15 04:54 PM | Reply

@#36 ... Which means the case against the Election Rigger Trump will proceed immediately. ...

Subpoenas, sanctions and shaming: Fani Willis' ordeal is far from over
www.axios.com

... Fulton County DA Fani Willis on Friday avoided disqualification from Georgia's election interference case against former President Trump, but other threats are looming that could jeopardize her role in the case.

Why it matters: Willis is the subject of ongoing investigations from Georgia State Senate and House Republicans, while a new state commission with extensive powers over prosecutors could also take action against her. ...


#40 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-03-15 05:02 PM | Reply

The local news just reported that Wade will be leaving the case.

#41 | Posted by Twinpac at 2024-03-15 05:19 PM | Reply

A minor slap on the hand - typical dem punishment. I 'm sure that if a Republican had done the same the punishment and your responses would be the same - Right? ; )

#42 | Posted by MSgt at 2024-03-15 05:33 PM | Reply

This ruling is strange. He gave the choice - one or the other had to go. To me it seems like both should be required to go or neither should be required.

#43 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-03-15 06:05 PM | Reply

He gave the choice - one or the other had to go.

Just puts an end to the "workplace fraternization" that makes no difference to the case anyway.

#44 | Posted by REDIAL at 2024-03-15 06:10 PM | Reply

@#44 ... Just puts an end to the "workplace fraternization" that makes no difference to the case anyway. ...

Yup.

The Judge said that the optics of the "workplace fraternization" were not good, but the Trump team did not show how it affected the case.

From #14

... -Judge Scott McAfee said he found the "appearance of impropriety" but ruled that the relationship brought no actual conflict of interest and denied the defendants' claims and requests. ...


#45 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-03-15 06:25 PM | Reply

The Judge said that the optics of the "workplace fraternization"

He also said "an odor of mendacity remains" .... brutal.

#46 | Posted by oneironaut at 2024-03-15 06:40 PM | Reply

Judge Scott McAfee said he found the "appearance of impropriety" but ruled that the relationship brought no actual conflict of interest and denied the defendants' claims and requests.

Judge is a fan of letting the appearance of impropriety sully his court.

#47 | Posted by oneironaut at 2024-03-15 06:42 PM | Reply

If the judge had said; Willis has to go because of _[_________

Or Wade has to go because of _____________

Then I'd get the whole one goes and one stays reasoning. But he didn't do that.

#48 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-03-15 07:00 PM | Reply

@#48 ... But he didn't do that. ...

Why should he have done it that way?

#49 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-03-15 07:10 PM | Reply

@#47 ... Judge is a fan of letting the appearance of impropriety sully his court. ...

Appearance does not meet the bar required for legal action.

#50 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-03-15 07:11 PM | Reply

Appearance does not meet the bar required for legal action.

Otherwise Lewzer would already be in prison for 100 years.

#51 | Posted by REDIAL at 2024-03-15 07:22 PM | Reply

Let's be honest about this. The judge is a Federalist Society judge. He's about as right-wing as they come. I had hoped for better from him. His demeanor is calm and quiet, and he appears to be fair. Then this.

This judge is acting just like Hur, Barr, Durham, Comey, etc. in finding no law was broken, but can't shut his mouth. This was particularly egregious, as he had to put that uppity woman in her place. I'm sure he believes she's a Democrat, and believes Wade was too. Unforgivable. He might as well be Gym Jordan or Comer.

Why can't Republicans judges just rule and leave it at that? I have no respect for this behavior on this judges part. There was no violation of Georgia law and yet he has to besmirch and denigrate, even proposing even more options for litigation by the defendants, and even suggesting the GA Bar, the State Ethics Commission, even the County Board of Commissioners might want to get involved.

Utterly shameless on his part. Incredible.

#52 | Posted by YAV at 2024-03-15 09:19 PM | Reply

I 'm sure that if a Republican had done the same the punishment and your responses would be the same
#42 | POSTED BY MSGT

What is it that you think that she did?

#53 | Posted by johnny_hotsauce at 2024-03-16 01:08 AM | Reply

MSGT

If Republicans had done anything similar, it would probably be with a Russian spy.

Ref: Maria Butina

#54 | Posted by Twinpac at 2024-03-16 01:28 AM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2024 World Readable

Drudge Retort