Lampy, you cherry picked one line....here are a few more (from your link).
"These competitive grants are open to a wide range of institutions and researchers, with a focus on preventative nutrition as well as emerging medical treatment options for cancer patients"
"Florida Cancer Innovation Fund projects have already demonstrated the program's impact, with grants supporting new monitoring technology for early disease detection, clinical trial expansion in rural areas, and data-driven precision medicine platforms."
"Applications will be evaluated based on scientific merit, innovation potential, collaborative strength, and ability to improve patient outcomes for all Floridians. Priority will be given to translational research, 12-month clinical trials, direct interventions with measurable outcomes, and projects serving rural and medically underserved areas throughout Florida."
"The event provided a platform for experts in cutting-edge cancer prevention research to explore innovative approaches to reducing cancer risk through nutrition and food regulation reform, highlighting the intersection of science, policy, and prevention."
"Further, priority will be given to projects that focus on nutrition, and the repurposing of generic drugs such as ivermectin for cancer treatment.
"Collaborative projects that bring together oncologists, researchers, and cancer treatment centers to break down traditional silos and foster rapid advancements in cancer care are also prioritized."
Do you have a problem with any of that? Or just the ivermectin part? Did you read the study I linked?
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Ivermectin impacts certain cancer cells in a very specific way that can potentially be exploited to aid delivery of certain biologics. There are many obstacles to overcome (dosage toxicity, etc), but many researchers worldwide believe further studies are warranted. Nobody is suggesting treating cancer with horse paste, and this sort of mockery only sets back legitimate medical research.