Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Monday, January 19, 2026

Eric Weiner: Gandhi and his methods are widely misunderstood. He was no pacifist. He was a fighter. He considered it "unmanly" to obey unjust laws; they must be resisted and with great force. Nonviolent force.

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

A New Hampshire Episcopal bishop is drawing national attention for urging clergy to prepare for a "new era of martyrdom."

[image or embed]

-- The Associated Press (@apnews.com) Jan 19, 2026 at 5:00 AM

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Gandhi would be violently arrested by ICE and sent to El Salvador to be tortured to death for his "crime".

"Gan.. what? Gonzales. Got it. Bag 'em."

What do I win?

#1 | Posted by redlightrobot at 2026-01-19 09:17 AM | Reply

What would Gandhi do? The author of this article has some thoughts:

Gandhi Was a Racist Who Forced Young Girls to Sleep in Bed with Him
www.vice.com

#2 | Posted by censored at 2026-01-19 09:56 AM | Reply

Leave it to Censored to Bitch about Gandhi.

I'm sure he's got Nothin' Bad to say about the Real Monsters, like Nuttyahoo, leading Zion to "Greatness"...

That's his whole Shtick..Sick Bastage.

#3 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2026-01-19 10:33 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Gandhi Was a Racist Who Forced Young Girls to Sleep in Bed with Him

It's a hit piece.

It's not wise to try and judge him by today's standards.

Yes it's "weird" by today's standards He did not "force" them to anything. And it was not sexual.

It was a test of his commitment to Celibacy (after his wife died). Which he passed.

Now if you want some real juicy stuff do Thomas Jefferson and his sex slave.

#4 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-01-19 10:49 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

>Gandhi Was a Racist Who Forced Young Girls to Sleep in Bed with Him
It's a hit piece. It's not wise to try and judge him by today's standards.

And old man sleeping naked in bed with grandniece has been slightly frowned upon since the time of the Targaryens.

Yes, the guy was weird.

Mahatma Gandhi: A saint obsessed with temptation & bowel movement
[...]the first question he asked his female attendants each day was: "Did you have a good bowel-movement this morning, sister?" He himself spent 20 minutes on a close-stool twice a day and took an enema every evening.In pursuit of the perfect bowel-movement [...]
timesofindia.indiatimes.com

#5 | Posted by censored at 2026-01-19 12:32 PM | Reply

The whitewash of Ghandi and our Civil Rights Movement alike is that both achieved their goals through solely nonviolent means.

That's a lie.

The people in charge tell us that lie, to give the appearance of a society that can addeess all its grievances through committed dialogue alone.

#6 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-01-19 12:36 PM | Reply

Gandhi Was a Racist Who Forced Young Girls to Sleep in Bed with Him

Who did Gandhi think he was, Donald Trump?

#7 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-01-19 12:37 PM | Reply

And old man sleeping naked in bed with grandniece has been slightly frowned upon since the time of the Targaryens.

He did not have sex with them.

And actually Co-sleeping is a common practice, with studies indicating that around 46% of parents in some regions sometimes or often share a bed with their child.

But. According to the Bible it's ok to get drunk and have sex with your own daughters as long as you pretend to not recognize them.

#8 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-01-19 12:44 PM | Reply

But. According to the Bible it's ok to get drunk and have sex with your own daughters as long as you pretend to not recognize them.
#8 | Posted by donnerboy

You didn't even have to be drunk, or not recognize them.

The list of things Thou Shalt Not Covet includes your neighbor's daughter.

But it doesn't include your own daughter.

Ask any Christian they'll confirm.

#9 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-01-19 12:49 PM | Reply

The list of things Thou Shalt Not Covet includes your neighbor's daughter.

But it doesn't include your own daughter.

Ask any Christian they'll confirm.

#9 | POSTED BY SNOOFY

Or just ask Trumpy.

#10 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-01-19 12:54 PM | Reply

#9

Even AI knows better:

www.google.com

#11 | Posted by Corky at 2026-01-19 12:55 PM | Reply

He did not have sex with them.
#8 | Posted by donnerboy

"It depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is."
- William Jefferson Clinton

#12 | Posted by censored at 2026-01-19 12:58 PM | Reply

"It depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is."

ha ha

No it does not.

#13 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-01-19 01:03 PM | Reply

"One's daughter (inferred from Leviticus 18:10)"

If you have to infer it, then it isn't expressly forbidden.

And the type of father who is going to use Christianity as an excuse to have sex with his daughter? Well, he's not big into inference.

#14 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-01-19 01:07 PM | Reply

It doesn't really matter what the Bible says about anything.

Trumpy makes the rulz now.

And Trumpy's perfectly ok with it so God will just have to be ok with it too now.

#15 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-01-19 01:09 PM | Reply

#5 No surprise that censored had something related to bowel movements ** right at his fingertips.

He/she must have a most *ahem* "interesting" browsing history.

** something he/she shares in common with the former afkabl2.

#16 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-01-19 01:27 PM | Reply

He did not have sex with them.

"Most angering for me, was reading about the psychological and emotional trauma of the girls and women who he used for his experiments', which is what he called these incidents. The word psychotic' repeatedly came up in various documents with regards to these women's mental state. The women, most of whom were in their late teens or early twenties (not surprisingly, given he could have experimented' with the older women or even his own wife!) were repeatedly described as depressed and weeping, and seemed to be completely in his control. Besides this, some of the archival references lead me to believe that Gandhi may well have been practicing the traditional, historic form of Indian celibacy which hinges on one thing only " and that is control of ejaculation. Everything else is permitted.
www.youthkiawaaz.com
And actually Co-sleeping is a common practice, with studies indicating that around 46% of parents in some regions sometimes or often share a bed with their child.
#8 | Posted by donnerboy

Not the way he did it. With all participants naked, and as a test of whether he could avoid the temptation of having sex with the co-sleeper.

#17 | Posted by censored at 2026-01-19 01:34 PM | Reply

#17 censored says, "With all participants naked..."

Curious: Were you spanking yourself when you wrote that?

'Cause it certainly looks like you really, really liked posting that.

#18 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-01-19 01:40 PM | Reply

#14 -

"The "Missing" Daughter: Curiously, father-daughter incest is not explicitly listed in Leviticus 18, though scholars agree it is implicitly forbidden by the general rule against "near of kin" (18:6) and the specific prohibition against a woman and her daughter (18:17).

Penalties: Under Old Testament law, the penalty for many forms of incest was death (Leviticus 20:11"21)."

from the above link

daughters are 'near kin'

6 "None of you is to come near anyone who is his close relatives to uncover their nakedness. I am Adonai.

Incest is also forbidden in the NT:

www.google.com

#19 | Posted by Corky at 2026-01-19 01:43 PM | Reply

It's a rotten shame how much evangelical Christianity ignores Christ's own proclamation of a "New Covenant," that His is the new way?:

Christians largely don't follow Leviticus's specific ceremonial and civil laws because the New Testament teaches that Jesus fulfilled the old law, establishing a new covenant centered on love, grace, and faith, not ritualistic obedience; the Levitical laws were for ancient Israel in a specific context, while the moral principles (like the Ten Commandments) are upheld through the lens of Christ's teachings. They believe Christ's sacrifice completed the sacrificial system and that God now relates to believers through the "law of Christ," emphasizing love for God and neighbor, rather than adhering to dietary rules, priestly duties, or purity codes.
So, why do evangelical Christians focus so much on Old Testament condemnation and so little in Christ's "New Covenant" of love, grace, and faith?

#20 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2026-01-19 01:52 PM | Reply

#20 Not bloody enough for them, AU.

They want the Tarantino version of the OT to replace the NT in its entirety.

#21 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-01-19 01:54 PM | Reply

Curious: Were you spanking yourself when you wrote that?'Cause it certainly looks like you really, really liked posting that.
#18 | Posted by A_Friend

The paraphrase from one of the many writers commenting upon Gandhi sexually exploiting his vulnerable cult members troubles you? Because it reveals Gandhi to be a lech?

You must be of the same ilk as the GOPers who called out a girl as a hoor when she testified in Congress about David Koresh raping her at the age of 10.

#22 | Posted by censored at 2026-01-19 01:57 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort