"Out of curiosity, the SAVE Act thread was closed for posting after my last post but hours later you added two more posts. How did that happen?"
I had preview windows open on two devices before closure. Frankly, I was as surprised as you.
"Your comment that a sealed envelope somehow equates to private voting at a booth is ridiculous. As if that removes the opportunity for a family member to pressure another family member how to vote or even worse someone just complete all ballots in that household."
You must assume a very large percentage of voters have bullies in their homes. And you somehow believe it's happening in every state, including the Californias and Wyomings, where the outcome is already a foregone conciusion.
"What I presented was a very real possibility and I'm sure occurred in some households."
I'm sure you're right. But if you seal your envelope, your wife won't find out. You're also ignoring the central math: how much more do you believe one side does that versus the other? Even if one side does it 50% MORE than the other, that's still only TEN net votes for every FIFTY instances of voter fraud.
"Your posts are getting more and more trollish and not worth my time to even bother to read."
You always say that when you're backed into a corner, and can't prove any of your assertions.
For example, where are the complaints in Oregon over the last 30 years, bearing out your theory? Certainly if this was happening as much as you're pretending, dozens (if not hundreds) of folks would be coming out of the woodwork telling your same story.
Instead, you can't point to a single one. Not in 30 years. And the most common excuse, when an excuse is give? I thought the other side was doing it.
Congratulations, Bill, your lies have led to MORE voter fraud!
