Judge: Corporations Can Vote in Some Delaware Elections
Corporations, partnerships, trusts, limited liability companies, and other "artificial entities" have the right to vote in Delaware elections under some circumstances, a judge said in a novel ruling Tuesday.
Menu
Front Page Breaking News Comments Flagged Comments Recently Flagged User Blogs Write a Blog Entry Create a Poll Edit Account Weekly Digest Stats Page RSS Feed Back Page
Subscriptions
Read the Retort using RSS.
RSS Feed
Author Info
qcp
Joined 2007/07/05Visited 2026/05/27
Status: user
MORE STORIES
The $24bn cost of Trump’s capitulation on Iran (4 comments) ...
Trump-backed Redistricting Plan Rejected in South Carolina (2 comments) ...
Judge: Corporations Can Vote in Some Delaware Elections (3 comments) ...
Mullin Floats Plan To Halt INTL Flights To Blue Cities (7 comments) ...
Court Rejects Alabama House Map, Unfair to Black Voters (12 comments) ...
Alternate links: Google News | Twitter
Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
More: Judge Craig A. Karsnitz rejected an ACLU challenge to a charter permitting voting in local elections by the entities that own most of the property in the Town of Fenwick Island, one of several municipalities in the state with similar provisions. Karsnitz dismissed the lawsuit from Delaware's Superior Court, citing "the principle of one person/entity/one vote."
"Visions of faceless large corporations or even HAL controlling a small town are frightening and the stuff of science fiction," but "trusts, partnerships, limited liability companies, and corporations are expressly recognized as persons' in the Delaware Code," the judge said.
Karsnitz, writing in a 19-page opinion Tuesday, rejected an array of constitutional arguments advanced by the ACLU, including the claim that entity voting dilutes the political power of living people.
The lawsuit "does not allege discrimination based on race or political partisanship," show "that entity property owners vote sufficiently as a bloc to usually defeat the preferred candidates of natural persons," or assert "that Fenwick's charter distinguishes between natural persons and entity property owners with the discriminatory intent to fence out natural persons," the judge said.
#1 | Posted by qcp at 2026-05-27 11:17 AM | Reply
Here is "Mr Henry F. Potter":
#2 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-05-27 11:28 AM | Reply
F'n Unbelievable!!
Isn't it enough that Corporations are already Super Citizens that buy politicians and elections and laws to benefit themselves?
#3 | Posted by Corky at 2026-05-27 12:46 PM | Reply
Post a comment The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed. Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it. Username: Password: Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy
The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy