Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Wednesday, June 17, 2026

The world has not reckoned with the violence visited on Iranians in 2026.

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

Who will stand up for the Iranian people as death rains on them from the skies? | Nasrin Parvaz

[image or embed]

-- The Guardian (@theguardian.com) 3:46 AM · Mar 10, 2026

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

"War has instead done what it usually does: empowered the powerful, rallied the faithful, and allowed an apparatus of repression to present its imperatives in terms of national security," writes Secot. "Trump, of course, is as indifferent to the fate of Iran's civilians as he is ignorant of their circumstances. But there is still one gesture he could make, in service not of the Iranian political opposition per se but of the forgotten cause of human decency, toward a population protected neither by its own regime nor by anyone else. The next time he shoots for the deal of the century, he could add to his list of pie-in-the-sky demands a few that would cost him and the Islamic Republic next to nothing: the release of those arbitrarily detained, an end to political executions, and a respectful burial for the dead."

#1 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2026-06-16 01:21 PM | Reply

How would the US respond if China Murdered Trump and half of Congress?

In a Sucker Punch Attack?

I Swear, these Guys making War Plans are just ------- retarded.

Where do they get these Delusional Ideas?

It's truly Amazing how stupid they are.

#2 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2026-06-16 02:52 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Hi Doc Sarvis:

Many folks have learned to ignore The Atlantic because of their subtle and not-so subtle pro-Israel bend.

I bet the word "Palestinian" or "Palestine" was barely-- or not even -- mentioned in the article.

I trust all is well.

Sources:

www.wrmea.org

therealnews.com

#3 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-06-16 03:41 PM | Reply

Agreed on how the mag leans, Coriolanus. That in mind, some good writing/interesting perspectives. This piece, for instance, makes it clear why Iranians would feel deeply and badly played by Trump/Netanyahu.

#4 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2026-06-17 05:36 AM | Reply

Top of the Morning Doc Sarvis:

I trust you are well.

Many young Iranians were easily rounded up and executed by the security services for spying on behalf of the Mossad during the unconstitutional and costly war the US fought against Iran for Israel's benefit.


I didn't see any reports of the Likud regime fighting on their behalf, the way the Ukrainian intelligence services fight for their spies caught by the FSB.

Like you wrote, the Iranian people were played and discarded like Kleenex.

But the Iranian economy will recover sooner than America's and everyone there will soon have universal healthcare coverage, unlike us.

When The Atlantic runs a headline "The Betrayal of the Iranian Palestinian People," I'll throw my eye on their writing.

BTW: I wrote an OP about the 1993 Oslo Accords, ICYMI.

#5 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-06-17 06:19 AM | Reply

"You talk about regime change," Trump said at the G7 meeting yesterday. "I never cared about regime change. It [was] never a part."

Tell that to the Iranians who were desperately incautious enough to actually lay their bone spurs aside, take heart from your incitement and rebel against the regime.

Well, actually, you probably can't- so many of them are dead, lying in mass graves, testimony to the idea that anything and everything you bump into turns to sh#te.

#6 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2026-06-17 06:31 AM | Reply

#5 Is there a link to the piece?

#7 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2026-06-17 06:32 AM | Reply

Hi Doc Sarvis:

There are many sources.

indianexpress.com

www.reuters.com

www.jpost.com

#8 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-06-17 06:40 AM | Reply

Sorry, Coriolanus, fog at my end: I meant the Oslo Accords OP you mentioned.

On the links you sent, I've no doubt intel networks - both imagined and real - got reeled in fast by the Iranians. Any Iranian inside Iran who lets out a peep is going to be (and is) labeled an agent of a US/Israeli alliance the regime just defeated.

#9 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2026-06-17 07:06 AM | Reply

No sweat, Doc Sarvis.

I wrote the "The Plan That Could Have Saved the Middle East" on drudge.com basically from memory and I anchored it with a Britannica.com link.

#10 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-06-17 07:17 AM | Reply

Thanks, Coriolanus. Those accords seemed to offer something quite different ... then Rabin was killed in a truly consequential assassination by a guy who'd fit in well within Netanyahu's cabinet.

#11 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2026-06-17 07:45 AM | Reply

Yup. Yigal Amir would be a perfect National Security Advisor for Benjamin Netanyahu.

"Blech!"

#12 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-06-17 07:58 AM | Reply

"Rabin was killed in a truly consequential assassination"

It's safe to call it a coup.
The "Peace Process" died along with Rabin that day.
Rabin's assassination was the Jewish Extremist version of Sadat's assassination two decades prior.
And, crucially, both leaders were assassinated for the same reason: Daring to make peace with the enemy.

Zionism and Hamas are two sides of the same coin. That being said, history informs us that Zionism came first, predating the Muslim Brotherhood by a few decades.

#13 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-06-17 11:01 AM | Reply

ANYONE who Believes the US GOVERNMENT has their back,especially as regarding Covert operations or Regime Change is a Fucking Idiot.

The people in Iran who believed Trump got Darwin Awards.

#14 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2026-06-17 11:34 AM | Reply

"You talk about regime change," Trump said at the G7 meeting yesterday. "I never cared about regime change. It [was] never a part."

Tell that to the Iranians who were desperately incautious enough to actually lay their bone spurs aside, take heart from your incitement and rebel against the regime.

Well, actually, you probably can't- so many of them are dead, lying in mass graves, testimony to the idea that anything and everything you bump into turns to sh#te.

#6 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

Wasn't regime change one of the first of many excuses Trump bandied about for the war?

#15 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2026-06-17 11:39 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

This Was a War......Desperately looking for an Excuse.

Bibi got his Iran Slaughter.

#16 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2026-06-17 02:42 PM | Reply

"You talk about regime change," Trump said at the G7 meeting yesterday. "I never cared about regime change. It [was] never a part."

Our President is senile.

#17 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-06-17 05:47 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort