Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Friday, August 21, 2026

Enrollment in the biggest federally funded food aid program in the U.S. dropped by more than 13% in a 12-month span " a decline far steeper than the government estimated as work requirements and other provisions of President Donald Trump's "big beautiful bill" take hold.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Starve Americans (not to mention cutting healthcare for them) so that billionaires can receive a multi-trillion dollar tax cut.

Yup, Pres Trump's Big Beautiful Bill.

And the GOP wonders why DSA seems to be increasing in popularity...


#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-08-21 06:49 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

The most dropped enrolments seem to be the people under 54 who don't work.

#2 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-08-21 07:33 PM | Reply

@#2

Got a link?


thx.

#3 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-08-21 07:48 PM | Reply

Got a link?

thx.
#3 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-08-21 07:48 PM | Reply | Flag:

No, But Corky does. He just doesn't want you to see it.

"For even when we were with you, we gave you this rule: "The one who is unwilling to work shall not eat."

-2 Thessalonians 3:10

Shout out, Corky

#4 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-08-21 08:12 PM | Reply

@#4 ... No, ...

So, your current trolling admits it has nada to substantiate what it posts.

Good to know.

#5 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-08-21 08:18 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

So, your current trolling admits it has nada to substantiate what it posts.
Good to know.
#5 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-08-21 08:18 PM | Reply |

No dumbass, I'm using scripture, like Corky does... Did you slip and fall again?

#6 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-08-21 09:30 PM | Reply

Where's Corky? Is that Muh ------ listening to Arlo Guthrie again?

#7 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-08-21 09:32 PM | Reply

GasLighter slipped on the wet stones and hit his head... Again...

#8 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-08-21 09:56 PM | Reply

Is it painful to be such a bitter and angry person?

Lefthindthirds.

You don't seem very excited about anything but "Owning the Libs".

I hope you find a good therapist.

I must suck to be so Angry.

#9 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2026-08-22 11:39 AM | Reply

"In Phoenix, LaDiamond Lopez lost her benefits in January, with officials telling her she needed more documentation about her income and household " something that's needed for officials to determine whether enrollees meet work requirements.

She's been skipping meals and some bill payments to ensure her children have enough to eat."

This doesn't really tell us anything unless you're someone who has been through this personally.

What does "more documentation" mean? what exactly are they asking for?

#10 | Posted by eberly at 2026-08-22 11:54 AM | Reply | Funny: 1

What does "more documentation" mean? what exactly are they asking for?
#10 | Posted by eberly

You don't care, Eberly.
Nobody cares.

#11 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-08-22 12:00 PM | Reply

"What does "more documentation" mean? what exactly are they asking for?"

They want to see her W-2s and her tax return.

Regardless, more hurdles to jump will ALWAYS lower the percentage of eligible people enrolled.

#12 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-08-22 12:17 PM | Reply

-They want to see her W-2s and her tax return.

Lemme guess ... you think that's asking too much?

They should just take her word?

#13 | Posted by eberly at 2026-08-22 01:26 PM | Reply

They should just take her word?
#13 | Posted by eberly

So she needs to present notarized copies of her W-2 and 1040.
Or they should just take her word?

#14 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-08-22 01:32 PM | Reply

"Lemme guess ... you think that's asking too much?"

No, not at all. As long as they weren't chosen for scrutiny because, say, they're a poor person who was gifted an iPhone.

#15 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-08-22 01:46 PM | Reply

Where's Corky?
#7 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTURDS

Obviously living rent free in that empty head of yours.

#16 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-08-22 01:46 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

The, "Americans should starve so billionaires can have tax cuts" Party is an abomination.

#17 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-08-22 01:47 PM | Reply

Literally two days ago, I had to cut out actual W-2s and return them to a tax client's home state to prove state taxes had been withheld. It could be for any number of reasons why the state thought he had zero withheld instead of $8K, but none of them were ours.

Which reminds me: if a taxpayer files a paper tax return and the IRS loses it, that's legally on the taxpayer, who would then be responsible for substitute proof.

#18 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-08-22 01:53 PM | Reply

"what exactly are they asking for?"

Ideally, anything that doesn't pass the smell test.

Is she wearing designer clothes? Is she driving a new $80,000 car? Does she live in a neighborhood where the property taxes are more than most people's rent?

I've seen where people have listed their monthly bills, and that amount was considerably over the income they were claiming.

Frankly, investigating stuff like that is exactly what I hope happening.

#19 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-08-22 02:03 PM | Reply

-As long as they weren't chosen for scrutiny because, say, they're a poor person who was gifted an iPhone.

The lady quoted in the article was complaining about the documentation they were requesting, not scrutiny over her wardrobe. The article appears to be sympathetic towards her for bringing no documentation to prove she's eligible.

#20 | Posted by eberly at 2026-08-22 02:15 PM | Reply

investigating stuff like that is exactly what I hope happening.
#19 | POSTED BY DANFORTH

Google AI:

"True intentional fraud in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) remains relatively rare, estimated historically at around 1% of total benefits."

Oh on! Gotta root out that 1%!!!

Face it.

They're just doing everything they can to make life for poor people more difficult.

While giving multi millionaires and billionaires tax cuts they don't need.

Wanna find some real fraud? Investigate the Multimillionaires and billionaires.

#21 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-08-22 05:01 PM | Reply

The article appears to be sympathetic towards her for bringing no documentation to prove she's eligible.
#20 | POSTED BY EBERLY

Why should anyone need to provide documentation to prove they need assistance?

Why do multimillionaires and billionaires need tax payer subsidies?

They can't afford to pay for their projects themselves?

#22 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-08-22 05:03 PM | Reply

-Why should anyone need to provide documentation to prove they need assistance?

We all know you don't mean that.

#23 | Posted by eberly at 2026-08-22 05:06 PM | Reply

"Face it. They're just doing everything they can to make life for poor people more difficult."

Agreed.

It's the inbred-cousin of vote suppression, all around the same central lie:

An additional barrier to (vote, get benefits) won't be an additional barrier to (vote, get benefits).

#24 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-08-22 05:07 PM | Reply

Agreed.

#25 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-08-22 05:23 PM | Reply

We all know you don't mean that.
#23 | POSTED BY EBERLY

I only wrote it to impress you.

#26 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-08-22 05:49 PM | Reply

-Why should anyone need to provide documentation to prove they need assistance?

I concur!

Why do multimillionaires and billionaires need tax payer subsidies?

I agree with you here ...

But I assume you're taking about Stadiums, and here's why it happens; researching why the Oakland deal fell apart., the Cities want control of the project.

So if the city wants control why should the owners of the team foot the bill? The team was throwing in all sorts of items that had nothing to do with the A's.

that is why most projects become the taxpayers burden, across the board I suspect this is what happens.

Cities never if ever, say build whatever you want and we will subsidize it.

That being said, I learned to from a friend who is a restaurant owner; His refrig went dead at the restaurant, and they replaced it, sales tax 10%, on top of that there is another tax for "property improvement" of his restuarant; WTF was improved.
This is the government at work behind the scenes, sure maybe the give them a subsidy, but the asset they build is TAXED to no end. This is the shit happens behind the scenes.

I think they are called Tangible Personal Property (TPP) / Business Personal Property (BPP) taxes.

I get taxed more (forever) if I make my plane safer to fly ... If I add a new avionics I pay a 10% sales tax, then I pay an asset tax on an asset that never depreciates. Ergo I pay more every year to the government to be safer for you and me. Thats insane.

NOW thinking about the hospital that paralyzed those patients; there are automated systems but they cost $1M+ but also there is an enormous "improvement tax" the hospital will have to pay. So the hospital has to weigh the odds and chances, in this case they got hosed, and people are paralyzed, why? Some of the reason is that taxes on improvements make things like safety unaffordable.

America is fucked up with these sorts of taxes on" improvements"; they aren't every where but they are in a majority of States. The government is actively charging a tax for safety and making things better.

#27 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-08-22 05:53 PM | Reply

Lets talk about big box vs local shop ....

When a big box moves in it pays for the property and taxes. But it doesn't pay for the same rate as a mom and pop store who employees local talent to build a display case ($1000), they get taxed heavily. The big box, throw up some cheap economy scale manufactured displays, cost $100.

The BPP creates a barrier to entry to the local mom and pop. Making the country a BigBox Country. On top of all profits going to the bigbox HQ versus your hometown.

The same reason Billionaires and BigBoxes are being created is because you want to collect MORE taxes.
Its not the big box retailers fault, its the government you wanted.
You indirectly voted for the big-boxes over mom-pop. The system is working as you wanted.

Lets go with your personal homes ..

Make an improvement and you are taxed at a new assessed rate. What's the logic here?
Or make changes to your home to make it better, you add perhaps a pool or an ADU, and the government wants its increase in value forever!
Despite that you improved it with your income that was taxed already ...
Look I get when you sell it and get the government reassess ithe property, but you can't improve your property without paying the government forever.
Thats insane.

So no one does it, or they do it without being permitted, or only the super rich that can afford to.

If you follow the above, and see the insanity happening in America now ... why investment into liquid assets are really the only play.

Perhaps, but unlikely you can understand why Billionaires would move to a new state, or be against an asset tax, and why you should be too.

It constrains investment, facors BIG corporations over mom and pop, which then constrains local tax revenue for the government, by staying local.

#28 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-08-22 06:31 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort