I doubt this was anything more than an attempt to see if and how a voting machine could be hacked.

"Moreover, the agency had been directed not to alert the voting machine company if it uncovered flaws"

Why would you alert the company if evidence was found of a conspiracy to directly impact an election? That would come in the form of a search warrant.

This article is retarded.

#2 | Posted by lfthndthrds

You're retarded.

Why wouldn't you alert the voting machine company if you found a weakness that could be hacked?

Obviously: BECAUSE YOU WANTED TO EXPLOIT THE WEAKNESS TO CHEAT

Because if we're paying for a SECURE voting device and it's found that it can be hacked and tampered with or there is a backdoor left open intentionally, the company would have to answer for the flaws or intentional rigging. But that wouldn't happen until the investigation was complete.

This is your last freebie, raetard.

#8 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Then why wouldnt they tell the company they found a flaw so it could be fixed?

BECAUSE TRUMP NEEDS TO CHEAT TO WIN.

Same as always.